|
|
Notice: Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for
Industry: Substantiation for Dietary Supplement Claims Made Under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Federal Register: April 25, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 81)
Page 22423-22424
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by May 27,
2008.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-6974, or e-mailed to baguilar@omb.eop.gov. All comments
should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-NEW and title,
``Draft Guidance for Industry: Substantiation for Dietary Supplement
Claims Made Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.'' Also
include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of the Chief
Information Officer (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Draft Guidance for Industry: Substantiation for Dietary Supplement
Claims Made Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act--(OMB
Control Number 0910-NEW)
Section 403(r)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6)) requires that a manufacturer of a dietary
supplement making a nutritional deficiency, structure/function, or
general well-being claim have substantiation that the statement is
truthful and not misleading. The draft guidance document entitled
``Guidance for Industry: Substantiation for Dietary Supplement Claims
Made Under Section 403(r)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act'' (November 9,
[[Page 22424]]
2004; 69 FR 64962) is intended to describe the amount, type, and
quality of evidence FDA recommends a dietary supplement manufacturer
have to substantiate a claim under section 403(r)(6) of the act. The
draft guidance does not discuss the types of claims that can be made
concerning the effect of a dietary supplement on the structure or
function of the body, nor does it discuss criteria to determine when a
statement about a dietary supplement is a disease claim. Persons with
access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance at the following
Web site: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leavingFR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/guidance.html.
A copy of the
draft guidance also is available for public examination in the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
In the Federal Register of January 28, 2008 (73 FR 4875), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the information
collection provisions. No comments were received.
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours Per
Claim Type Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Widely known, established 667 1 667 44 29,348
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-existing, not widely established 667 1 667 120 80,040
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Novel 667 1 667 120 80,040
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 189,428
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dietary supplement manufacturers will only need to collect
information to substantiate their product's nutritional deficiency,
structure/function, or general well-being claim if they chose to place
a claim on their product's label. Gathering evidence on their product's
claim is a one time burden; they collect the necessary substantiating
information for their product as required by section 403(r)(6) of the
act.
The standard discussed in the draft guidance for substantiation of
a claim on the labeling of a dietary supplement is consistent with
standards set by the Federal Trade Commission for dietary supplements
and other health-related products that the claim be based on competent
and reliable scientific evidence. This evidence standard is broad
enough that some dietary supplement manufacturers may only need to
collect peer-reviewed scientific journal articles to substantiate their
claims; other dietary supplement manufacturers whose products have
properties that are less well documented may have to conduct studies to
build a body of evidence to support their claims. It is unlikely that a
dietary supplement manufacturer will attempt to make a claim when the
cost of obtaining the evidence to support the claim outweighs the
benefits of having the claim on the product's label. It is likely that
manufacturers will seek substantiation for their claims in the
scientific literature.
The time it takes to assemble the necessary scientific information
to support their claims depends on the product and the claimed
benefits. If the product is one of several on the market making a
particular claim for which there is adequate publicly available and
widely established evidence supporting the claim, then the time to
gather supporting data will be minimal; if the product is the first of
its kind to make a particular claim or the evidence supporting the
claim is less publicly available or not widely established, then
gathering the appropriate scientific evidence to substantiate the claim
will be more time consuming.
FDA assumes that it will take 44 hours to assemble information
needed to substantiate a claim on a particular dietary supplement when
the claim is widely known and established. We increased this estimated
burden from 1 hour per claim to 44 hours per claim based on information
received from industry, as noted in our June 7, 2007, document in
response to comment 1 (72 FR 31583 and 31584). FDA believes it will
take closer to 120 hours to assemble supporting scientific information
when the claim is novel or when the claim is pre-existing but the
scientific underpinnings of the claim are not widely established. These
are claims that may be based on emerging science, where conducting
literature searches and understanding the literature takes time. It is
also possible that references for claims made for some dietary
ingredients or dietary supplements may primarily be found in foreign
journals and in foreign languages or in the older, classical literature
where it is not available on computerized literature databases or in
the major scientific reference databases, such as the National Library
of Medicine's literature database, all of which increases the time of
obtaining substantiation.
In the Federal Register of January 6, 2000, FDA published a final
rule on statements made for dietary supplements concerning the effect
of the product on the structure or function of the body (65 FR 1000).
FDA estimated that there were 29,000 dietary supplement products
marketed in the United States (65 FR 1000 at 1045). Assuming that the
flow of new products is 10 percent per year, then 2,900 new dietary
supplement products will come on the market each year. The structure/
function final rule estimated that about 69 percent of dietary
supplements have a claim on their labels, most probably a structure/
function claim (65 FR 1000 at 1046). Therefore, we assume that
supplement manufacturers will need time to assemble the evidence to
substantiate each of the 2,001 claims (2,900 x 69 percent) made each
year. If we assume that the 2,001 claims are equally likely to be pre-
existing widely established claims, novel claims, or pre-existing
claims that are not widely established, then we can expect 667 of each
of these types of claims to be substantiated per year. Table 1 of this
document shows that the annual burden hours associated with assembling
evidence for claims is 189,428 (the sum of 667 x 44 hours, 667 x 120
hours, and 667 x 120 hours).
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs
associated with this information collection.
Dated: April 17, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-8973 Filed 4-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
|