|
|
Notice: Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Antimicrobial Animal
Drug Distribution Reports Under Section 105 of the Animal Drug User Fee
Amendments of 2008 Federal Register: February 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 32)
Page 7272-7274AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by March
22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910--NEW and
title ``Antimicrobial Animal Drug Distribution Reports Under Section
105 of the Animal Drug User Fee Amendments of 2008.'' Also include the
FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley Jr., Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Antimicrobial Animal Drug Distribution Reports Under Section 105 of the
Animal Drug User Fee Amendments of 2008--(OMB Control Number 0910-
NEW)--Extension
Section 105 of the Animal Drug User Fee Amendments of 2008 (ADUFA)
amended section 512 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
act) (21 U.S.C. 360b) to require that the sponsor of each new animal
drug that contains an antimicrobial agent submit an annual report to
FDA on the amount of each antimicrobial active ingredient in the drug
that is sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals,
including information on any distributor-labeled product. The
legislation was enacted to address the problem of antimicrobial
resistance, and to help ensure that FDA has the necessary information
to examine safety concerns related to the use of antibiotics in food-
producing animals (154 Congressional Record H7534).
Each report must specify: (1) The amount of each antimicrobial
active ingredient by container size, strength, and dosage form; (2)
quantities distributed domestically and quantities exported; and (3) a
listing of the target animals, indications, and production classes that
are specified on the approved label of the product.
The first report must be submitted not later than March 31, 2010.
The report must cover the period of the preceding calendar year and
include separate information for each month of the calendar year. The
reports required under section 105 of ADUFA are required to be separate
from periodic drug experience reports that are required under Sec.
514.80(b)(4) (21 CFR Sec. 514.80(b)(4) (OMB Control No. 0910-0284).
In the Federal Register of October 26, 2009 (74FR 55046), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. FDA received comments from two
organizations. Both commenters supported the information collection and
stated that the data to be collected would be useful in addressing
[[Page 7273]]
the problem of antimicrobial resistance. However, both comments
suggested that more extensive measures are necessary to address this
problem. For example, one of the comments stated that the practical
utility of the data would be broadened in conjunction with a larger
federal monitoring effort requiring manufacturers to report uses of
their products in all food animal products, which would involve
collecting data from end users such as veterinarians and animal owners.
The other comment stated that the information collection would not be
sufficient to show how much of each class of antimicrobial is sold for
use in different types of food animals, and recommended that FDA
collect distribution data on medicated feeds for this purpose because
feeds are specific to animal species and class. The comment also
recommended that FDA require all data to be submitted through a Web-
based application directly into a form created by FDA, and that FDA
create a publically accessible database that allows searches by drug
class, dose form, and marketing status. FDA has considered the
comments, but at this time we have decided to only require the
submission of information that is expressly required to be submitted by
section 512(l)(3) of the act. We are pursuing notice and comment
rulemaking to codify these requirements, during which time we will
assess any additional data requirements.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per
FD&C Act Section 512(l)(3) Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours Capital Cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Reports for Sponsors with Active 29 6.7 194 80 15,520 $107,880
Applications
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Reports for Sponsors with Inactive 23 4.0 92 1 92 ..............
Applications
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 15,612 $107,880
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Table 2.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FD&C Act
Section No. of Annual Frequency of Total Annual Hours per Record Total Hours
512(l)(3) Respondents Recordkeeping Records
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All Applicants 34 1 34 2 68
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 68
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
The reporting burden estimates, including the total number of
annual responses, are based on the number of sponsors and approved
applications for antimicrobial drug products in food-producing animals.
The annual frequency of responses was calculated as the total annual
responses divided by the number of respondents.
The agency arrived at the estimates for reporting as follows: There
are 34 sponsors with approved applications for antimicrobial drugs for
food-producing animals. There are 29 animal drug manufacturers with 194
approved applications for antimicrobial drugs for food-producing
animals for which the drugs are being actively marketed (active
applications). Additionally, there are 93 approved applications for
antimicrobial drugs for food-producing animals for which the drugs are
not being marketed (inactive applications), owned by 23 animal drug
manufacturers.
Regarding the reporting burden associated with the collection of
information, FDA believes that the large majority of the burden will be
incurred by industry in the first year in which reporting is required
to design a report that meets the requirements of section 512(l)(3) of
the act. The agency has estimated this burden at 80 hours per applicant
with active applications. The agency has factored into this estimate
the time it will take industry to identify and locate the necessary
information within existing records, and to develop a report that
complies with section 512(l)(3) of the act. Once this has been
accomplished, FDA believes that the process for producing reports in
subsequent years will essentially be automated, and that it will take
approximately 3 hours to run a report that satisfies the act's
requirements. For sponsors of approved applications that are inactive
(i.e., the approved drug is not being marketed), the sponsor would only
have to submit a report stating that the drug is not being marketed,
which FDA estimates will take approximately 1 hour.
FDA has developed a form to report the information required by
section 512(l)(3) of the act. FDA plans to make the form available to
animal drug manufacturers through FDA's Web site, however, use of the
form would be entirely voluntary. The form contains various fields for
information, including the drug manufacturer's name, NADA number,
active ingredient name, National Drug Code number, container size,
potency, and the number of units sold by month.
The animal drug manufacturers can meet the statutory requirements
by submitting their information in paper format using either the FDA-
provided form or one of their own design or by designing their own
electronic form whose results could be submitted to the agency on a
compact disc or on paper. The cost to animal drug sponsors for
gathering the necessary information for report design and preparation
or for completing FDA's form in the first year of reporting is $107,880
(29 active sponsors x 80 hours x $46.50 per hour = $107,880). This is a
one-time cost for a computer or mathematic employees to design and
prepare a report that satisfies
[[Page 7274]]
the statutory requirements of section 512(l)(3) of the act.\1\ For
subsequent years, the preparation of the report should take
approximately 3 hours. Thus, the total cost in subsequent years would
be $139.50.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ BLS Occupation Employment and Wages, May 2006, by
occupation, for all industries (http://www.bls.gov). Wage ($46.50)
includes mean hourly wage of $33.22 for Standard Occupational
Classification 15-0000, computer and mathematics occupations, all
industries; we add 40 percent to account for benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding the recordkeeping burden associated with this collection
of information, FDA believes that most of the necessary information for
the annual report required to be submitted under section 512(l)(3) of
the act is already collected and maintained by animal drug
manufacturers under existing requirements.
Animal drug manufacturers are already required to maintain
distribution records for their drug products to comply with FDA's
current good manufacturing practice regulations under Sec. 211.196 (21
CFR Sec. 211.96) (OMB Control No. 0910-0139), and to comply with
regulations for periodic drug experience reports under Sec.
514.80(b)(4)(i) (OMB Control No. 0910-0284). Therefore, FDA believes
that manufacturers of animal drugs already possess the computers,
software, and additional equipment necessary to collect and maintain
the necessary records and to make reports.
Section 512(l)(3) of the act differs from Sec. 514.80(b)(4)(i) in
that it requires that records include separate information for each
month of the calendar year. Under Sec. 211.196 (OMB Control No. 0910-
0139), manufacturers currently are required to maintain distribution
records that include the dosage form and date the drug is distributed.
Additionally, FDA believes that manufacturers already keep detailed
records of the dates when antimicrobial drugs are distributed for
marketing and recall purposes from which monthly reports can be
prepared as part of their usual and customary practice. However, FDA
estimates an additional hourly burden required by section 512(l)(3) of
the act as shown in table 2 of this document.
Dated: February 4, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-3029 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S |