|
|
Notice: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Investigating the Causes of
Post Donation Information (PDI): Errors in the Donor Screening Process Federal Register: February 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 35)
Page 8080-8081Agency: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c) (2) (A)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public
comment on proposed data collection projects, the National Heart, Lung,
and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the National Institutes of Health (NIH),
will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
Proposed Collection: Title: Investigating the causes of post
donation information (PDI): Errors in the donor screening process. Type
of Information Collection Request: NEW. Need and Use of Information
Collection: Blood centers are required to use a health history
screening questionnaire to obtain eligibility information for the
protection of the donor and recipient prior to blood donation. However,
the health history process is known to be error-prone and the reasons
for those errors are largely unknown and untested. Donors often fail to
report a risk that would have resulted in deferral. This deferral risk
may be disclosed at a subsequent donation and is classified as Post
Donation Information (PDI). While this deferral risk may be at the next
donation event, many examples of PDI are not disclosed nor discovered
until several intervening donation events have occurred. The reasons
why donors fail to disclose a deferrable history at the time of one
donation but subsequently disclose this information at a later time are
unidentified. This protocol is designed to ascertain why PDI error
events occur. It will be the first study of any kind to address the
issue of PDI errors in any systematic fashion. By conducting interviews
with donors involved in PDI errors, we will gain important qualitative
knowledge about this problem. Information gathered from these
interviews will not only elucidate the issue of PDI but will provide
insight into donor understanding of the screening process and their
feelings about the process and blood donation in general.
The main objectives of the study are:
1. To explore reasons behind errors in the donor screening process
when donors initially fail to disclose an accurate and complete health
history.
2. To explore PDI donors' knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and
beliefs (KABB) about the health history questionnaire and their
experience with the screening process and the center.
3. To compare KABB in PDI donors to deferred (but not PDI) donors
and accepted donors.
The study sample will consist of three donor groups:
1. Donors with a PDI: all identified donors of interest with an FDA
reportable donor suitability error classified as PDI at the REDS-II
centers
2. Deferred donors: appropriately deferred (but not PDI deferred
donors) at the REDS-II centers
3. Accepted Donors: appropriately accepted for donation at the
REDS-II centers
Telephone interviews will be conducted with consented donors to
collect information regarding their knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and
beliefs about the donor health history process. Even though the
interviews with the donors will be individual, we would like to form
groups of similar PDI and deferred donors for analysis purposes.
The five groups of interest include PDI occurrences or deferrals
that are due to
Travel (malaria, vCJD)
Medical (history of diseases including jaundice/hepatitis,
surgery and medications needed to treat disease including Tegison,
Proscar and Accutane)
Blood/Disease Exposure (tattoo, piercings, accidental needle
stick)
High Risk Behavior--Sexual (MSM, sex with IV drug-user or
test-positive individual)
High Risk Behavior--Non-Sexual (IV drug use, non-sexual
exposure to Hepatitis C or Hepatitis B.
All interviews will be digitally-recorded and the recordings
uploaded onto computers as dss files; these files will be transcribed
and then coupled to the interviewer notes to form an analytic package
for the data analysts. Once the interview is conducted successfully,
each study donor will be mailed a check of $25 as an incentive for
participating in the study.
The cognitive testing of the interview guide will be conducted at
the Hoxworth Blood Center and at the Coordinating Center. For this
purpose, the blood center staff will identify 2 PDI and 2 deferred
donors from the five broad categories of interest. They will also
contact 2 accepted donors for study consent and interview. These donors
will be approached and consented by following the same procedures that
will be used for the actual study.
The data from the semi-structured interviews will be analyzed in
two ways. The close-ended responses will be analyzed quantitatively.
This will likely take the form of 3-way cross-tabulations of frequency
distributions in responses to key questions. The open-ended responses
will be analyzed as qualitative data. All analytic steps and
assumptions that led up to the conclusions, including competing
interpretations of the data, will be fully discussed in the final
report.
Frequency of Response: Once. Affected Public: Individuals. Type of
Respondents: Adult blood donors. The annual reporting burden is a
follows: Estimated Number of Respondents: 408; Estimated Number of
Responses per Respondent: 1; Average Burden of Hours per Response: 0.08
for the initial phone call and 0.5 for responding to the actual
interview; and Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours Requested: 83.64.
The annualized cost to respondents is estimated at: $1505.52 (based on
$18 per hour). There are no Capital Costs to report. There are no
Operating or Maintenance Costs to report.
Table 1: Estimate of Requested Burden Hours and Dollar Value of Burden
Hours
Table A.12-1 Estimates of Hour Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated number Average burden Estimated total
Type of respondents Number of of responses per hours per annual burden
respondents respondent response hours requested
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Donors initially contacted............ 408 1 .08 32.6
PDI Donors............................ * 60 1 0.5 30
Deferred Donors....................... * 30 1 0.5 15
[[Page 8081]]
Accepted Donors....................... * 12 1 0.5 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................. 408 ................ ................. 83.64
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* These respondents are a subgroup of total 408 donors who will be initially contacted to participate in the
study.
Request for Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies should address one or more of the
following points: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the function of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
For Further Information Contact: To request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and
instruments, contact Dr. George Nemo, Project Officer, NHLBI, Two
Rockledge Center, Room 9144, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-
7950, or call 301-435-0075, or E-mail your request to nemog@nih.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 60 days
of the date of this publication.
Dated: February 16, 2010.
George Nemo,
NHLBI Project Officer, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-3449 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P |