|
|

Title: Method for genetic immunization and introduction
of molecules into skeletal muscle and immune cells
United States Patent: 6,261,281
Inventors: Mathiesen; Iacob (Oslo, NO); Tollefsen; Stig
(Oslo, NO)
Assignee: Electrofect AS (NO)
Appl. No.: 565140
Filed: May 5, 2000
Abstract
A method is disclosed for enhanced vaccination and genetic vaccination
of mammals. The vaccination is accomplished by delivering molecules such
as proteins and nucleic acids into skeletal muscle and other cells
residing in the skeletal muscle in vivo. The protein or nucleic acid is
first injected into the muscle at one or multiple sites. Immediately or
shortly after injection, electrodes are placed flanking the injection site
and a specific amount of electrical current is passed through the muscle.
The electrical current makes the muscle permeable, thus allowing the
pharmaceutical drug or nucleic acid to enter the cell. The efficiency of
transfer permits robust immune responses using DNA vaccines and produces
sufficient secreted proteins for systemic biological activity to be
observed.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a method for delivering or transfecting
pharmaceutical drugs, proteins, and DNA into skeletal muscle and other
cells residing within the skeletal muscle. Without being bound by theory,
the method is thought to be similar to electroporation. Electroporation
works on the principle that a cell acts as an electrical capacitor and is
generally unable to pass current. Subjecting cells to a high-voltage
electric field, therefore, creates transient permeable structures or
micropores in the cell membrane. These pores are large enough to allow
pharmaceutical drugs, DNA, and other polar compounds to gain access to the
interior of the cell. With time, the pores in the cell membrane close and
the cell once again becomes impermeable.
Conventional electroporation, however, employs high field strengths from
0.4 to several kV/cm. In contrast to conventional electroporation, the
field strength used in the present invention ranges from about 10 V/cm to
about 300 V/cm. These lower field strengths are thought to cause less
muscle damage without sacrificing, and indeed increasing, transfection
efficiencies. Furthermore, using the method of the present invention,
transfection efficiencies can be tightly regulated by altering such
parameters as frequency, pulse duration and pulse number.
The increase in DNA transfection efficiency is observed only if the muscle
is electrically stimulated immediately, or shortly after the DNA
injection. Thus, the semipermeable quality of the tissue induced by the
stimulation is reversible. Moreover, it is dependent on current through
the muscle; activity induced through the nerve does not affect
transfection efficiency.
Once transfected, the muscle cells are able to express the proteins coded
by the nucleic acid. Therefore, the transfection method of the present
invention can be used, for example, to transfect expression vectors for
genetic immunization (i.e., DNA vaccines). In one embodiment, rabbits were
transfected with a plasmid containing the cDNA for rat agrin. The
transfected muscles produced and secreted agrin protein. Nineteen days
post-transfection, rabbit serum contained significant antibodies against
rat agrin.
In a second embodiment, mice and rats were transfected using the method of
the present invention with one or more of three different eukaryotic
expression vectors containing the coding sequences for DH-CNTF, an
agonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor, AADH-CNTF, an
antagonistic variant of human ciliary neurotrophic factor and sec-DHCNTF,
a secreted form of DH-CNTF. The muscles were either not electrically
stimulated or stimulated immediately after DNA injection. Blood was
collected at various time points and the antibody titers determined. In
both rats and mice, electrical stimulation immediately after DNA injection
led to approximately 5 to 10-fold higher antibody titers than simple DNA
injection.
The transfection method of the present invention can also be used to
systemically deliver proteins to treat diseases. In one preferred
embodiment, a DNA plasmid harboring the erythropoietin (EPO) gene was
injected into skeletal muscle and stimulated according to the method of
the present invention. Controls were either not stimulated or transfected
with a control vector not harboring the EPO gene. After 14 days, only the
mice transfected with EPO according to the method of the present invention
displayed an increased hematocrit indicating the transfected muscles were
able to produce and secrete into the blood stream substantial amounts of
EPO.
Non-nucleic acids may also be transfected by the method of the present
invention. In one embodiment, rhodamin conjugated dextran was injected
into the muscle followed by electrical stimulation. Three to five days
later the muscles were frozen in liquid nitrogen and sectioned on a
cryostat. Fluorescence was observed in cells injected and stimulated,
indicating the rhodamin conjugated dextran was able to enter and remain in
the muscle cells.
In order to reduce pain that may be associated with the method of the
present invention, a local anesthetic can be injected at the site of
treatment prior to or in conjunction with the injection of DNA. For
example, in one embodiment of the current invention, DNA may be mixed with
Marcain, a local anesthetic, followed by electroporation.
Claim 1 of 34 Claims
We claim:
1. A method of delivering a DNA molecule to the immune system of a mammal
in vivo comprising:
mixing a first solution comprising the DNA molecule with a second solution
comprising a local anesthetic to produce a DNA-anesthetic mixture;
injecting the DNA-anesthetic mixture into an injection site in a skeletal
muscle of the mammal;
positioning electrodes near the injection site such that current traveling
through the electrodes passes through the injection site; and
electrically stimulating the muscle with an electrical current having a
field strength of from about 10 V/cm to about 300 V/cm.
____________________________________________
If you want to learn more
about this patent, please go directly to the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office Web site to access the full
patent.
|