|
|

Title: Allergy treatment method using a rapid
immunotherapy protocol
United States Patent: 6,488,937
Issued: December 3, 2002
Inventors: Smits; William (6409 Post Rd., Fort Wayne, IN
46814)
Appl. No.: 644719
Filed: August 23, 2000
Abstract
A method of treating a patient sensitive to an allergen includes a
desensitizing rapid immunotherapy protocol of administering to the patient a
series of gradually increasing doses of a composition comprising the
allergen at intervals of about 15 minutes for a duration of less than about
120 minutes, and preferably less than about 90 minutes. A pretreatment
protocol administers to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of at
least one composition that is effective in reducing a sensitivity of the
patient to an asthma associated allergenic reaction.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A treatment method has been developed that is ordered towards providing
therapeutic assistance to patients suffering from acute or immediate
hypersensitivity to various allergens. By way of background, immediate
hypersensitivity (or anaphylactic response) is a form of allergic reaction
which develops very quickly, i.e., within seconds or minutes of exposure of
the patient to the causative allergen. As used herein, and conventionally
understood, the term "allergen" relates to a specific subclass of antigen
which can trigger immediate hypersensitivity, which is mediated by IgE
antibodies made by B lymphocytes.
In non-allergic patients, there is no IgE antibody of clinical relevance;
however, in a person suffering with allergic diseases, IgE antibody mediates
immediate hypersensitivity by sensitizing mast cells that are abundant in
the skin, lymphoid organs, membranes of the eye, nose and mouth, and the
respiratory tree and intestines. Mast cells have surface receptors for IgE,
and the IgE antibodies in allergy-suffering patients become bound to them.
When the bound IgE is subsequently contacted by the appropriate allergen,
the mast cell is caused to degranulate and to release various substances
called bioactive mediators, such as histamine, into the surrounding tissue.
It is the biologic activity of the substances that is responsible for the
clinical symptoms typical of immediate hypersensitivity, namely, contraction
of smooth muscle in the airways or the intestines, the dilation of small
blood vessels and the increase in their permeability to water and plasma
proteins, the secretion of thick sticky mucus, and, in the skin, redness,
swelling and the stimulation of nerve endings that results in itching or
pain.
According to the present invention, a treatment method is provided that
encompasses a form of treatment conventionally known in various equivalent
alternative forms as rapid desensitization, rapid allergen immunotherapy,
rapid allergen vaccination, and rapid or rush immunotherapy. In broad terms,
this procedure aims to advance an allergic patient to an immunizing or
maintenance dose of extract (i.e., allergen) by administering a series of
injections (or via another suitable carrier) of increasing doses of the
allergen at frequent intervals. If successful, the patient will exhibit an
improved resistance to the allergen, possibly even presenting a total
non-reactivity to any subsequent allergen exposure. Conventional rush or
rapid desensitization procedures typically take place over a period of one
to two days and up to several days and weeks.
According to the present invention, an accelerated rapid immunotherapy
protocol has been provided that administers the gradually increasing doses
of allergen over a period of less than a few hours and yet achieves a rate
of systemic reaction during or following treatment that is dramatically less
than that demonstrated by conventional allergen immunotherapies which take
much longer.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a method of
treating a patient sensitive to an allergen includes a protocol of
administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of a
composition comprising the allergen over a duration of less than about 120
minutes, and, more preferably, less than about 90 minutes. The protocol is
performed according to a rapid immunotherapy protocol in which progressively
increasing doses of the allergen are administered at selected intervals,
such as 10 to 20 minutes. The protocol is developed with a view towards
enabling the patient to reach and/or advance to a maintenance dose within
the allocated time frame.
In a preferred form, the treatment protocol employs a dilution level for
each allergen dosage that is within the range from between about 1:150,000
to about 1:50,000 to between about 1:1500 to about 1:500. In a more
preferred form, the allergen doses are administered at about 15 minute
intervals according to the following dosage schedule:
INTERVAL TIME (approx.) DOSAGE (approx.)
0 1:150,000 to 1:50,000
15 1:150,000 to 1:50,000
30 1:15,000 to 1:5,000
45 1:15,000 to 1:5,000
60 1:1500 to 1:500
75 1:1500 to 1:500
Optional dosages of between about 1:150 to 1:50 may be administered at 90
minutes and 105 minutes.
It should be understood that the manner of delivering the allergen dosages
may encompass any suitable route (e.g., oral or injection) and employ any
pharmaceutically acceptable carrier as well understood by those skilled in
the art. Additionally, the times and dosage levels indicated above should be
understood as forming guidelines that the skilled artisan may use to make
adjustments thereto within the scope of the present invention. Other aspects
of performing the rapid immunotherapy procedure are well within the routine
understanding and practice of those skilled in the art. The ratios, volumes,
and selected allergen may be changed by the skilled artisan.
An examination and evaluation study was performed which conducted two
separate half-day schedules for desensitizing and observing 311 patients
according to the present invention. All patients exhibited positive
percutaneous skin tests to perennial and seasonal inhalant allergens. The
targeted final dose ranged from about 0.1 cc to about 0.5 cc of about a
1:1000 dilution of aqueous and glycerinated extracts manufactured by ALK and
Greer Laboratories. Most patients were then continued onto higher doses by
resuming a conventional immunotherapy schedule. Patients ranged from 11/2 to
68 years of age. Diagnoses included allergic rhinitis (92%), asthma (51%),
and chronic sinusitis (63%). Most patients also had associated headaches.
The following table illustrates the dosing schedule used in the foregoing
study, using about 15 minute intervals for administering the allergen
dosage.
AMOUNT (vol.)
INTERVAL TIME (approx.) DOSAGE (approx.) (approx.)
0 min. 1:100,000 0.025 cc
15 min. 1:100,000 0.25 cc
30 min. 1:10,000 0.025 cc
45 min. 1:10,000 0.25 cc
60 min. 1:1000 0.025 cc
75 min. 1:1000 0.25 cc
90 min. 1:100 0.025 cc
105 min. 1:100 0.1 cc
The dosages at 90 minutes and 105 minutes are optional. It should be
understood that the indicated volumetric quantities applicable to each
dosage may be suitably adjusted in a known manner to facilitate or otherwise
adapt the immunotherapy protocol based upon the patient reaction or
condition or in response to other factors well understood by those skilled
in the art. Dosage ratios may be varied within the scope of the present
invention. One reason the ratios may need to be changed may be sensitivity
of the patient to the allergen (e.g., 1:1,000,000,000, 1:1,000,000) to
create an effective treatment for very allergic patients.
The foregoing dosage schedule would be used in conjunction with
administering the allergen amount into one arm of the patient, for example.
A substantially identical schedule would be used to administer another
allergen amount into the other arm. Preferably, different allergen types
would be used to enable rapid desensitization involving two different
antigens within the same day. The two desensitization regimens may be
performed concurrently with one another (as in the foregoing study) or may
be conducted in serial manner with one protocol following the other,
preferably within the same day.
Follow-up observations of the patients involved in the study revealed that
eleven patients (3.5%) experienced a mild systemic reaction. Significantly,
these documented systemic reactions occurred less frequently with the
treatment protocol disclosed herein and used a lower targeted final dose
than previously described in the art. All of the patients responded to
subcutaneous epinephrine and/or nebulized albuterol and were deemed fit to
return home. None of the patients experienced true anaphylactic shock. These
clinical results confirm that maintenance immunotherapy according to the
present invention can be reached quickly, safely, effectively and with
improved compliance.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a
pretreatment method is provided for use in combination with the treatment
protocol described above. The pretreatment method is performed on the
patient prior to receiving rapid immunotherapy in the manner described
above.
According to one aspect of the pretreatment method, there is provided a
protocol or regimen of administering to the patient prednisone (or any other
suitable corticosteroid) and at least one of an H1 histamine antagonist
and an H2 histamine antagonist. The H1 histamine antagonist may be
selected from the group comprising Claritin.TM. (Loratadine), Seldane.TM. (Terfenadine),
Zyrtec.TM. (Cetirizine hydrochloride), and Allegra.TM. (Fexofenadine
hydrochloride), for example, while the H2 histamine antagonist may be
selected from the group including Zantac.TM. (Ranitidine hydrochloride),
Pepcid.TM. (Famotidine), and Tagamet.TM. (Cimetidine), where the associated
generic drug name is indicated in parentheses. However, these individual
drug types should not be considered in limitation of the present invention
as it should be apparent that other suitable anti-histamine or
histamine-blocking agents may be used. Additionally, any suitable manner
known to those skilled in the art may be used to prepare and administer this
premeditation regimen.
It was observed that the efficacy of the rapid immunotherapy protocol (as
measured in part by the number and degree of systemic reactions) tended to
correlate roughly with the extent of pretreatment that was directed towards
reducing or eliminating a sensitivity of the patient to an asthma associated
allergenic reaction, such as might occur during and/or after the
immunotherapy protocol. Accordingly, the foregoing pretreatment method is
enhanced by administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount
of at least one composition which is effective in reducing the sensitivity
of the patient to an asthma associated allergenic reaction. For example, the
patient may be administered a corticosteroid (oral or inhaled), and a
leukotriene medication such as Singular.TM., Accolade.TM., Zyflo.TM., or a
combination thereof. Additional asthma medications may also be used.
By controlling this vulnerability or susceptibility to an asthma-related
allergenic reaction, it was found that the rate of systemic reactions was
capable of being further reduced. The administration of this anti-asthma
medication as part of the pretreatment protocol is preferably done in
combination with the first premedication regimen discussed above. Notably,
the invention does not use antacids as part of the pretreatment protocol.
In the study mentioned above, 107 patients received premedication with
prednisone (60 mg daily for adults and 2 mg/kg for children) and H1
antihistamine (Claritin.TM., Seldane.TM., Zyrtec.TM., or Allegra.TM.), for
three days prior to receiving rapid desensitization. Additionally, 204
patients received a premedication regimen of prednisone in combination with
both H1 and H2 blockade (Zantac.TM., Pepcid.TM., or Tagamet.TM.)
and Singular.TM. with a dosage level of approximately 4 to 20 mg.
While this invention has been described as having a preferred methodology
and design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit
and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to
cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its
general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such
departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary
practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within
the limits of the appended claims.
Claim 1 of 36 Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of treating a patient sensitive to an allergen, comprising
administering to said patient a therapeutically effective desensitizing
amount of a composition comprising said allergen at intervals between 10 to
20 minutes over a duration of less than about 120 minutes according to a
rapid immunotherapy protocol.
____________________________________________
If you want to learn more
about this patent, please go directly to the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office Web site to access the full
patent.
|