|
|

Link:
Pharm/Biotech Resources
Title: RRP sequences and knockout mice and uses thereof
United States Patent: 6,972,179
Issued: December 6, 2005
Inventors: Friedman; Lori (San Francisco, CA); Belvin;
Marcia (Albany, CA); Larson; Jeffrey S. (Burlingame, CA); Francis-Lang;
Helen (San Francisco, CA); Plowman; Gregory D. (San Carlos, CA)
Assignee: Exelixis, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA)
Appl. No.: 056790
Filed: January 23, 2002
Abstract
RRP genes are identified as modulators of the p53 or p21 pathway, and
thus are therapeutic targets for disorders associated with defective p53 or
p21 function. Methods for identifying modulators of p53 or p21, comprising
screening for agents that modulate the activity of RRP are provided.
Modulating agents identified using the methods of the invention can be used
to specifically inhibit growth of tumor cells that overexpress an RRP
protein. mRRP1 knockout mice are also provided.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
We have discovered genes that modify the p53 or p21 pathway in
Drosophila, and identified their mammalian orthologs, hereinafter
referred to as Rhomboid Related Proteins (RRP), and more specifically,
RRP1-RRP8, and mouse RRP1 (mRRP1). The invention provides isolated nucleic
acid molecules that comprise nucleic acid sequences encoding RRP protein as
well as fragments and derivatives thereof. Vectors and host cells comprising
the RRP nucleic acid molecules are also described.
The invention provides methods for utilizing these p53 or p21 modifier genes
and polypeptides to identify RRP modulating agents, which are candidate
therapeutic agents that can be used in the treatment of disorders associated
with defective p53 or p21 function.
In one embodiment, candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents are tested with an
assay system comprising a RRP polypeptide or nucleic acid. Candidate agents
that produce a change in the activity of the assay system relative to
controls are identified as candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents. The assay
system may be cell-based or cell-free. Candidate modulating agents include
small molecule modulators, antibodies, and nucleic acid modulators. In one
specific embodiment, a small molecule modulator is identified using a
protease assay. In specific embodiments, the screening assay system is
selected from an apoptosis assay, a cell proliferation assay, an
angiogenesis assay, and a hypoxic induction assay.
In another embodiment, candidate p53 or p21 pathway modulating agents are
further tested using a second assay system that detects changes in the p53
or p21 pathway, such as angiogenic, apoptotic, or cell proliferation changes
produced by the originally identified candidate agent or an agent derived
from the original agent. The second assay system may use cultured cells or
non-human animals. In specific embodiments, the secondary assay system uses
non-human animals, including animals predetermined to have a disease or
disorder implicating the p53 or p21 pathway, such as an angiogenic,
apoptotic, or cell proliferation disorder (e.g. cancer).
The invention further provides methods for modulating the p53 or p21 pathway
in a mammalian cell by contacting the mammalian cell with an agent that
specifically binds a RRP polypeptide or nucleic acid. The agent may be a
small molecule modulator, a nucleic acid modulator, or an antibody and may
be administered to a mammalian animal predetermined to have a pathology
associated the p53 or p21 pathway.
Modulating agents identified using the methods of the invention can be used
to specifically inhibit growth of tumor cells that overexpress an RRP
protein.
The invention also provides transgenic knockout mice harboring disrupted RRP
genes. The disruption may be heterozygous, leading to decreased expression
of RRP, or homozygous, leading to lack of expression of the RRP gene. Cells
from the mice as well as cells harboring disrupted RRP genes are also
provided. Methods of producing antibody to RRP using the mice of the
invention are also provided.
Targeting vectors to produce transgenic knockout mice are also provided.
Preferably, a targeting vector is provided that allows sequential deletion
of vector sequences from the same cell in the generation of the knockout
mice.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Genetic screens were designed to identify modifiers of the p53 or p21
pathways in Drosophila. Genetic modifier screens were carried out in
which p53 (Ollmann M, et al., Cell 2000 101: 91-101) or p21 (Bourne H R, et
al., Nature (1990) 348(6297):125-132; Marshall C J, Trends Genet (1991)
7(3):91-95) were overexpressed. Drosophila rhomboid genes were
identified as modifiers of the p53 or p21 pathways. Accordingly, vertebrate
orthologs of these modifiers, hereinafter referred to as RRP genes (i.e.,
nucleic acids and polypeptides), are attractive drug targets for the
treatment of pathologies associated with a defective p53 or p21 signaling
pathways, such as cancer. Further, gene targeting in mice is an ideal method
to investigate the function of a distinct protein in wild type and disease
states. In order to study the RRP1 function in mammals we generated the
genomic sequence of the RRP1 region in mice, deduced its cDNA and protein
sequence, and then produced targeted RRP1 knockout (KO) mice.
In vitro and in vivo methods of assessing RRP function as provided herein,
and modulation of the RRP or their respective binding partners is useful for
understanding the association of the p53 or p21 pathways and their members
in normal and disease conditions and for developing diagnostics and
therapeutic modalities for p53 or p21 related pathologies. RRP-modulating
agents that act by inhibiting or enhancing RRP expression, directly or
indirectly, for example, by affecting an RRP function such as enzymatic
(e.g., catalytic) or binding activity, can be identified using methods
provided herein. RRP-modulating agents include RRP related proteins (e.g.
dominant negative mutants, and biotherapeutics); RRP-specific antibodies;
RRP-specific antisense oligomers; and chemical agents that specifically bind
RRP or compete with RRP binding target. The invention provides methods of
identifying and making RRP modulating agents, and their use in diagnosis,
therapy and pharmaceutical development.
Preferred RRP-modulating agents specifically bind to RRP polypeptides and
enhance or inhibit RRP function. Other preferred RRP-modulating agents are
antisense oligomers and RNAi that repress RRP gene expression or product
activity by, for example, binding to and inhibiting the respective nucleic
acid (i.e. DNA or mRNA). RRP-specific modulating agents may be evaluated by
any convenient in vitro or in vivo assay for molecular interaction with an
RRP polypeptide or nucleic acid.
The method of this invention is useful in the therapy of malignant or benign
tumors of mammals that overexpress RRP gene products.
Nucleic Acids and Polypeptides of the Invention
Sequences related to RRP nucleic acids (RRP1: SEQ ID NO:1, RRP2: SEQ ID
NO:3, RRP3: SEQID NO:5, RRP4: SEQ ID NO:7, RRP5: SEQ ID NO:9, RRP6: SEQ ID
NO:11, RRP7: SEQ ID NO:13, and RRP8: SEQ ID NO:15) and polypeptides (RRP1:
SEQ ID NO:2, RRP2: SEQ ID NO: 4, RRP3: SEQID NO:6, RRP4: SEQ ID NO:8, RRP5:
SEQ ID NO:10, RRP6: SEQ ID NO:12, RRP7: SEQ ID NO:14, and RRP8: SEQ ID
NO:16) are available in the public databases (for RRP1: cDNA: GI#3287190,
SEQ ID NO:18; proteins GI#3287191, SEQ ID NO:36; for RRP2: cDNAs: GI#s:
12762689 (SEQ ID NO:19), 12096415 (SEQ ID NO:20), 6657080 (SEQ ID NO:21),
7947756 (SEQ ID NO:22), 3117010 (SEQ ID NO:23), 9339870 (SEQ ID NO:24),
7152496 (SEQ ID NO:25), 11317512 (SEQ ID NO:26), 11317513 (SEQ ID NO:27),
and 11317511 (SEQ ID NO:28); proteins: GI#s:8923409 (SEQ ID NO:37), 12719522
(SEQ ID NO:38), and 11421817 (SEQ ID NO:39); for RRP3: cDNA: GI#10199673 (SEQ
ID NO:29) and GI#2003992 (SEQ ID NO:30); for RRP4: cDNA GI#11066249 (SEQ ID
NO:31) and protein GI#11066250 (SEQ ID NO:40); for RRP5: cDNA GI#11967982 (SEQ
ID NO:32) and protein GI#11967983 (SEQ ID NO:41); for RRP6: cDNA GI#10438685
(SEQ ID NO:33) and protein GI#10438686 (SEQ ID NO:42); for RRP7: cDNA
GI#10190733 (SEQ ID NO:34) and protein GI#10190734 (SEQ ID NO:43); and for
RRP8: cDNA GI#1 1072100 (SEQ ID NO:35) and protein GI#11072101 (SEQ ID
NO:44)). Sequences of human and rat RRP1 were used to deduce the mouse RRP1
(mRRP1) cDNA (SEQ ID NO:45), polypeptide (SEQ ID NO:46), and genomic (SEQ ID
NO:47) sequences, as described in Example VII. The mRRP1 cDNA sequence
shares 69% identity with human RRP1 and 88% identity with rat partial RRP1
for nucleotides 884-1340 of the mouse RRP1. The mRRP1 protein shares 80%
identity with human RRP1 and 88% identity with rat partial RRP1 for amino
acids 297-448 of mRRP1.
RRPs are a family of integral membrane proteins that contain five or more
transmembrane domains and three strongly conserved histidine residues in the
putative transmembrane regions. In a preferred embodiment, the invention
provides RRP proteins which comprise or consist of an amino acid sequence of
SEQ ID NOs:4, 6, or 46, or fragments or derivatives thereof.
The term "RRP polypeptide" refers to a full-length RRP protein or a
functionally active fragment or derivative thereof. A "functionally active"
RRP fragment or derivative exhibits one or more functional activities
associated with a full-length, wild-type RRP protein, such as antigenic or
immunogenic activity, enzymatic activity, ability to bind natural cellular
substrates, etc. The functional activity of RRP proteins, derivatives and
fragments can be assayed by various methods known to one skilled in the art
(Current Protocols in Protein Science (1998) Coligan et al., eds., John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., Somerset, N.J.) and as further discussed below. For
purposes herein, functionally active fragments also include those fragments
that comprise one or more structural domains of an RRP, such as a protease
or rhomboid domain a binding domain. Catalytic and other domains can be
identified using the PFAM program (Bateman A., et al., Nucleic Acids Res,
1999, 27:260-2). Methods for obtaining RRP polypeptides are also further
described below. Preferred fragments are functionally active,
domain-containing fragments sharing at least 80% sequence identity or
similarity, preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, and most
preferably at least 95% sequence identity or similarity with a contiguous
stretch of at least 25 amino acids, preferably at least 50 amino acids, more
preferably at least 100 amino acids, and in some cases, the entire length of
any one of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 46. In further
preferred embodiments, the fragment comprises the entire rhomboid domain (PFAM
01694).
RRP protein derivatives typically share a certain degree of sequence
identity or sequence similarity with SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16,
or 46 or a fragment thereof. RRP derivatives can be produced by various
methods known in the art. The manipulations which result in their production
can occur at the gene or protein level. For example, a cloned RRP gene
sequence can be cleaved at appropriate sites with restriction endonuclease(s)
(Wells et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London SerA (1986) 317:415), followed
by further enzymatic modification if desired, isolated, and ligated in
vitro, and expressed to produce the desired derivative. Alternatively, an
RRP gene can be mutated in vitro or in vivo, to create and/or destroy
translation, initiation, and/or termination sequences, or to create
variations in coding regions and/or to form new restriction endonuclease
sites or destroy preexisting ones, to facilitate further in vitro
modification. A variety of mutagenesis techniques are known in the art such
as chemical mutagenesis, in vitro site-directed mutagenesis (Carter et al.,
Nucl. Acids Res. (1986) 13:4331), use of TAB® linkers (available from
Pharmacia and Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Mich.), etc.
At the protein level, manipulations include post translational modification,
e.g. glycosylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, amidation, derivatization
by known protecting/blocking groups, proteolytic cleavage, linkage to an
antibody molecule or other cellular ligand, etc. Any of numerous chemical
modifications may be carried out by known technique (e.g. specific chemical
cleavage by cyanogen bromide, trypsin, chymotrypsin, papain, V8 protease,
NaBH4, acetylation, formylation, oxidation, reduction, metabolic
synthesis in the presence of tunicamycin, etc.). Derivative proteins can
also be chemically synthesized by use of a peptide synthesizer, for example
to introduce nonclassical amino acids or chemical amino acid analogs as
substitutions or additions into the RRP protein sequence.
Chimeric or fusion proteins can be made comprising an RRP protein or
fragment thereof (preferably comprising one or more structural or functional
domains of the RRP protein) joined at its amino- or carboxy-terminus via a
peptide bond to an amino acid sequence of a different protein. Chimeric
proteins can be produced by any known method, including: recombinant
expression of a nucleic acid encoding the protein (comprising a RRP-coding
sequence joined in-frame to a coding sequence for a different protein);
ligating the appropriate nucleic acid sequences encoding the desired amino
acid sequences to each other in the proper coding frame, and expressing the
chimeric product; and protein synthetic techniques, e.g. by use of a peptide
synthesizer.
The subject RRP polypeptides also encompass minor deletion mutants,
including N-, and/or C-terminal truncations. Such deletion mutants are
readily screened for RRP competitive or dominant negative activity.
The term "RRP nucleic acid" refers to a DNA or RNA molecule that encodes a
RRP polypeptide. In preferred embodiments, the nucleic acid encodes a
polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, 10,
12, 14, 16, and 46. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid comprises a
sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11,
13, 15, and 45. In a specific embodiment, the invention provides an isolated
nucleic acid which encodes a human RRP3 as shown in SEQ ID NO:5, and also an
isolated nucleic acid that encodes a mouse RRP (mRRP1) as shown in SEQ ID
NO:45.
The invention includes a fragment of a nucleic acid, such as a fragment that
encodes a binding domain of one of the full-length sequences of the
invention. Fragments of an RRP nucleic acid sequence can be used for a
variety of purposes. As an example, interfering RNA (RNAi) fragments,
particularly double-stranded (ds) RNAi, can be used to generate
loss-of-function phenotypes; which can, in turn, be used, among other uses,
to determine gene function. Certain "antisense" fragments, i.e. that are
reverse complements of portions of the coding and/or untranslated regions
(e.g. 5′ UTR) have utility in inhibiting the function of RRP proteins. The
fragments are of length sufficient to specifically hybridize with the
corresponding RRP sequence. The fragments consist of or comprise at least
12, preferably at least 24, more preferably at least 36, and more preferably
at least 96 contiguous nucleotides of RRP. When the fragments are flanked by
other nucleic acid sequences, the total length of the combined nucleic acid
sequence is less than 15 kb, preferably less than 10 kb or less than 5 kb,
more preferably less than 2 kb, and in some cases, preferably less than 500
bases.
In other specific embodiments, preferred fragments of SEQ ID NO:5 encode
extracellular or intracellular domains which are located at approximately
nucleotides 248-598, 665-796, 862-870, 934-943, 1006-1138, 1201-1225, and
1289-1336. Additional preferred fragments of SEQ ID NO:45 encode
extracellular or intracellular domains which are located at approximately
nucleotides 1-714, 774-912, 972-984, 1044-1089, 1149-1212, 1272-1305,
1365-1408. Preferred fragments may also include a binding domain or an RRP
motif (e.g. PFAM 01694). These domains may be useful to locate the function
and/or binding partners of a protein. For example, a nucleic acid that
encodes an extracellular or intracellular domain of a protein may be used to
screen for binding partners related to the protein.
The subject nucleic acid sequences may consist solely of the RRP nucleic
acid or fragments thereof. Alternatively, the subject nucleic acid sequences
and fragments thereof may be joined to other components such as labels,
peptides, agents that facilitate transport across cell membranes,
hybridization-triggered cleavage agents or intercalating agents. The subject
nucleic acid sequences and fragments thereof may also be joined to other
nucleic acid sequences (i.e. they may comprise part of larger sequences) and
are of synthetic/non-natural sequences and/or are isolated and/or are
purified, i.e. unaccompanied by at least some of the material with which it
is associated in its natural state. Preferably, the isolated nucleic acids
constitute at least about 0.5%, and more preferably at least about 5% by
weight of the total nucleic acid present in a given fraction, and are
preferably recombinant, meaning that they comprise a non-natural sequence or
a natural sequence joined to nucleotide(s) other than that which it is
joined to on a natural chromosome.
The subject nucleic acids find a wide variety of applications including use
as translatable transcripts, hybridization probes, PCR primers, diagnostic
nucleic acids, etc.; use in detecting the presence of RRP genes and gene
transcripts and in detecting or amplifying nucleic acids encoding additional
RRP homologs and structural analogs. In diagnosis, RRP hybridization probes
find use in identifying wild-type and mutant RRP alleles in clinical and
laboratory samples. Mutant alleles are used to generate allele-specific
oligonucleotide (ASO) probes for high-throughput clinical diagnoses. In
therapy, therapeutic RRP nucleic acids are used to modulate cellular
expression or intracellular concentration or availability of active RRP. In
a preferred embodiment, the mouse RRP1 sequence is used to produce a
targeting vector for production of mice that are deficient in RRP1 in a
heterozygous or homozygous (i.e., knockout) manner.
In one preferred embodiment, the derivative nucleic acid encodes a
polypeptide comprising a RRP3 amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:6, an mRRP1
amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:46, or a fragment or derivative thereof. A
derivative RRP3 nucleic acid sequence, or fragment thereof, may comprise
100% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:5 or 45, but be a derivative thereof
in the sense that it has one or more modifications at the base or sugar
moiety, or phosphate backbone. Examples of modifications are well known in
the art (Bailey, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (1998), 6th
ed. Wiley and Sons). Such derivatives may be used to provide modified
stability or any other desired property.
Preferably, the RRP polypeptide nucleic acid, fragment, ortholog, or
derivative thereof has at least 70% sequence identity, preferably at least
80%, more preferably 85%, still more preferably 90%, and most preferably at
least 95% sequence identity with RRP. Normally, orthologs in different
species retain the same function, due to presence of one or more protein
motifs and/or 3-dimensional structures. As used herein, "percent (%)
sequence identity" with respect to a subject sequence, or a specified
portion of a subject sequence, is defined as the percentage of nucleotides
or amino acids in the candidate derivative sequence identical with the
nucleotides or amino acids in the subject sequence (or specified portion
thereof), after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary to
achieve the maximum percent sequence identity, as generated by the program
WU-BLAST-2.0a19 (Altschul et at., J. Mol. Biol. (1997)215:403-410 ) with all
the search parameters set to default values. The HSP S and HSP S2 parameters
are dynamic values and established by the program itself depending upon the
composition of the particular sequence and composition of the particular
database against which the sequence of interest is being searched. A %
identity value is determined by the number of matching identical nucleotides
or amino acids divided by the sequence length for which the percent identity
is being reported. "Percent (%) amino acid sequence similarity" is
determined by doing the same calculation as for determining % amino acid
sequence identity, but including conservative amino acid substitutions in
addition to identical amino acids in the computation.
A conservative amino acid substitution is one in which an amino acid is
substituted for another amino acid having similar properties such that the
folding or activity of the protein is not significantly affected. Aromatic
amino acids that can be substituted for each other are phenylalanine,
tryptophan, and tyrosine; interchangeable hydrophobic amino acids are
leucine, isoleucine, methionine, and valine; interchangeable polar amino
acids are glutamine and asparagine; interchangeable basic amino acids are
arginine, lysine and histidine; interchangeable acidic amino acids are
aspartic acid and glutamic acid; and interchangeable small amino acids are
alanine, serine, threonine, cysteine and glycine.
Alternatively, an alignment for nucleic acid sequences is provided the local
homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman (Smith and Waterman, 1981, Advances
in Applied Mathematics 2:482-489; database: European Bioinformatics
Institute; Smith and Waterman, 1981, of Molec. Biol., 147:195-197; Nicholas
et al., 1998, "A Tutorial on Searching Sequence Databases and Sequence
Scoring Methods" and references cited therein.; W. R. Pearson, 1991, Gen
mics 11:635-650). This algorithm can be applied to amino acid sequences by
using the scoring matrix developed by Dayhoff (Dayhoff: Atlas of Protein
Sequences and Structure, M. O. Dayhoff ed., 5 suppl. 3:353-358, National
Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA), and normalized by
Gribskov (Gribskov 1986 Nucl. Acids Res. 14(6):6745-6763). The
Smith-Waterman algorithm is used to search databases for sequences similar
to a query sequence. Smith-Waterman uses dynamic programming to determine
how an optimal alignment between the query sequence and a database sequence
can be produced. This alignment is obtained by determining what
transformations the query sequence would need to undergo to match the
database sequence. Transformations include substituting one character for
another and inserting or deleting a string of characters. A score is
assigned for each character-to-character comparison—positive scores for
exact matches and some substitutions, negative scores for other
substitutions and insertions/deletion. The first character in an insertion
or deletion gap is scored with a gap open penalty and subsequent characters
are scored with a gap extension penalty. Scores are obtained from
statistically-derived scoring matrices. The combination of transformations
that results in the highest score is used to generate an alignment between
the query sequence and database sequence. Smith-Waterman algorithm may be
employed where default parameters are used for scoring (for example, gap
open penalty of 12, gap extension penalty of two). From the data generated
the "Match" value reflects "sequence identity."
Derivative nucleic acid molecules of the subject nucleic acid molecules
include sequences that hybridize to the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID
NOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 1, 13, 15, or 45. The stringency of hybridization can be
controlled by temperature, ionic strength, pH, and the presence of
denaturing agents such as formamide during hybridization and washing.
Conditions routinely used are set out in readily available procedure texts
(e.g., Current Protocol in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1, Chap. 2.10, John Wiley
& Sons, Publishers (1994); Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring
Harbor (1989)). In some embodiments, a nucleic acid molecule of the
invention is capable of hybridizing to a nucleic acid molecule containing
the nucleotide sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15,
or 45 under stringent hybridization conditions that comprise:
prehybridization of filters containing nucleic acid for 8 hours to overnight
at 65° C. in a solution comprising 6× single strength citrate (SSC) (1×SSC
is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M Na citrate; pH 7.0), 5×Denhardt's solution, 0.05%
sodium pyrophosphate and 100 μg/ml herring sperm DNA; hybridization for
18-20 hours at 65° C. in a solution containing 6×SSC, 1×Denhardt's solution,
100 μg/ml yeast tRNA and 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate; and washing of filters
at 65° C. for 1 h in a solution containing 0.2×SSC and 0.1% SDS (sodium
dodecyl sulfate).
In other embodiments, moderately stringent hybridization conditions are used
that comprise: pretreatment of filters containing nucleic acid for 6 h at
40° C. in a solution containing 35% formamide, 5×SSC, 50 mM Tris-HCl
(pH7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% PVP, 0.1% Ficoll, 1% BSA, and 500 μg/ml denatured
salmon sperm DNA; hybridization for 18-20 h at 40° C. in a solution
containing 35% formamide, 5×SSC, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 0.02%
PVP, 0.02% Ficoll, 0.2% BSA, 100 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and 10% (wt/vol)
dextran sulfate; followed by washing twice for 1 hour at 55° C. in a
solution containing 2×SSC and 0.1% SDS.
Alternatively, low stringency conditions can be used that comprise:
incubation for 8 hours to overnight at 37° C. in a solution comprising 20%
formamide, 5×SSC, 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.6), 5×Denhardt's solution,
10% dextran sulfate, and 20 μg/ml denatured sheared salmon sperm DNA;
hybridization in the same buffer for 18 to 20 hours; and washing of filters
in 1×SSC at about 37° C. for 1 hour.
Isolations, Production, Expression, and Mis-expression of RRP Nucleic Acids
and Polypeptides
RRP nucleic acids and polypeptides, useful for identifying and testing
agents that modulate RRP function and for other applications related to the
involvement of RRP in the p53 or p21 pathways. RRP nucleic acids and
derivatives and orthologs thereof may be obtained using any available
method. For instance, techniques for isolating cDNA or genomic DNA sequences
of interest by screening DNA libraries or by using polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) are well known in the art. In general, the particular use for the
protein will dictate the particulars of expression, production, and
purification methods. For instance, production of proteins for use in
screening for modulating agents may require methods that preserve specific
biological activities of these proteins, whereas production of proteins for
antibody generation may require structural integrity of particular epitopes.
Expression of proteins to be purified for screening or antibody production
may require the addition of specific tags (e.g., generation of fusion
proteins). Overexpression of an RRP protein for assays used to assess RRP
function, such as involvement in cell cycle regulation or hypoxic response,
may require expression in eukaryotic cell lines capable of these cellular
activities. Techniques for the expression, production, and purification of
proteins are well known in the art; any suitable means therefore may be used
(e.g., Higgins S J and Hames B D (eds.) Protein Expression: A Practical
Approach, Oxford University Press Inc., New York 1999; Stanbury P F et al.,
Principles of Fermentation Technology, 2nd edition, Elsevier
Science, New York, 1995; Doonan S (ed.) Protein Purification Protocols,
Humana Press, New Jersey, 1996; Coligan J E et al, Current Protocols in
Protein Science (eds.), 1999, John Wiley & Sons, New York; U.S. Pat. No.
6,165,992). In particular embodiments, recombinant RRP is expressed in a
cell line known to have defective p53 or p21 function (e.g. for p53: SAOS-2
osteoblasts, H1299 lung cancer cells, C33A and HT3 cervical cancer cells,
HT-29 and DLD-1 colon cancer cells, among others, and for p21: HCT116 colon
cancer cells, among others, available from American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC), Manassas, Va.). The recombinant cells are used in cell-based
screening assay systems of the invention, as described further below.
The nucleotide sequence encoding an RRP polypeptide can be inserted into any
appropriate expression vector. The necessary transcriptional and
translational signals, including promoter/enhancer element, can derive from
the native RRP gene and/or its flanking regions or can be heterologous. A
variety of host-vector expression systems may be utilized, such as mammalian
cell systems infected with virus (e.g. vaccinia virus, adenovirus, etc.);
insect cell systems infected with virus (e.g. baculovirus); microorganisms
such as yeast containing yeast vectors, or bacteria transformed with
bacteriophage, plasmid, or cosmid DNA. A host cell strain that modulates the
expression of, modifies, and/or specifically processes the gene product may
be used.
To detect expression of the RRP gene product, the expression vector can
comprise a promoter operably linked to an RRP gene nucleic acid, one or more
origins of replication, and, one or more selectable markers (e.g. thymidine
kinase activity, resistance to antibiotics, etc.). Alternatively,
recombinant expression vectors can be identified by assaying for the
expression of the RRP gene product based on the physical or functional
properties of the RRP protein in in vitro assay systems (e.g. immunoassays).
The RRP protein, fragment, or derivative may be optionally expressed as a
fusion, or chimeric protein product (i.e. it is joined via a peptide bond to
a heterologous protein sequence of a different protein), for example to
facilitate purification or detection. A chimeric product can be made by
ligating the appropriate nucleic acid sequences encoding the desired amino
acid sequences to each other using standard methods and expressing the
chimeric product. A chimeric product may also be made by protein synthetic
techniques, e.g. by use of a peptide synthesizer (Hunkapiller et al., Nature
(1984) 310:105-111).
Once a recombinant cell that expresses the RRP gene sequence is identified,
the gene product can be isolated and purified using standard methods (e.g.
ion exchange, affinity, and gel exclusion chromatography; centrifugation;
differential solubility; electrophoresis, cite purification reference).
Alternatively, native RRP proteins can be purified from natural sources, by
standard methods (e.g. immunoaffinity purification). Once a protein is
obtained, it may be quantified and its activity measured by appropriate
methods, such as immunoassay, bioassay, or other measurements of physical
properties, such as crystallography.
The methods of this invention may also use cells that have been engineered
for altered expression (mis-expression) of RRP or other genes associated
with the p53 or p21 pathway. As used herein, mis-expression encompasses
ectopic expression, over-expression, under-expression, and non-expression
(e.g. by gene knock-out or blocking expression that would otherwise normally
occur).
Genetically Modified Animals
Animal models that have been genetically modified to alter RRP expression
may be used in in vivo assays to test for activity of a candidate p53 or p21
modulating agent, or to further assess the role of RRP in a p53 or p21
pathway process such as apoptosis or cell proliferation. Preferably, the
altered RRP expression results in a detectable phenotype, such as decreased
or increased levels of cell proliferation, angiogenesis, or apoptosis
compared to control animals having normal RRP expression. The genetically
modified animal may additionally have altered p53 or p21 expression (e.g.
p53 or p21 knockout). Preferred genetically modified animals are mammals
such as primates, rodents (preferably mice), cows, horses, goats, sheep,
pigs, dogs and cats. Preferred non-mammalian species include zebrafish,
C. elegans, and Drosophila. Preferred genetically modified
animals are transgenic animals having a heterologous nucleic acid sequence
present as an extrachromosomal element in a portion of its cells, i.e.
mosaic animals (see, for example, techniques described by Jakobovits, 1994,
Curr. Biol. 4:761-763.) or stably integrated into its germ line DNA (i.e.,
in the genomic sequence of most or all of its cells). Heterologous nucleic
acid is introduced into the germ line of such transgenic animals by genetic
manipulation of, for example, embryos or embryonic stem cells of the host
animal.
Methods of making transgenic animals are well-known in the art (for
transgenic mice see Brinster et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 4438-4442
(1985), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,736,866 and 4,870,009, both by Leder et al., U.S.
Pat. No. 4,873,191 by Wagner et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,127,598, by German et
al., and Hogan, B., Manipulating the Mouse Embryo, Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., (1986); for particle bombardment
see U.S. Pat. No., 4,945,050, by Sandford et al.; for transgenic
Drosophila see Rubin and Spradling, Science (1982) 218:348-53 and U.S.
Pat. No. 4,670,388; for transgenic insects see Berghammer A. J. et al., A
Universal Marker for Transgenic Insects (1999) Nature 402:370-371; for
transgenic Zebrafish see Lin S., Transgenic Zebrafish, Methods Mol Biol.
(2000);136:375-3830); for microinjection procedures for fish, amphibian eggs
and birds see Houdebine and Chourrout, Experientia (1991) 47:897-905; for
transgenic rats see Hammer et al., Cell (1990) 63:1099-1112; and for
culturing of embryonic stem (ES) cells and the subsequent production of
transgenic animals by the introduction of DNA into ES cells using methods
such as electroporation, calcium phosphate/DNA precipitation and direct
injection see, e.g., Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells, A Practical
Approach, E. J. Robertson, ed., IRL Press (1987)). Clones of the nonhuman
transgenic animals can be produced according to available methods (see
Wilmut, I. et al. (1997) Nature 385:810-813; and PCT International
Publication Nos. WO 97/07668 and WO 97/07669).
In one embodiment, the transgenic animal is a "knock-out" animal having a
heterozygous or homozygous alteration in the sequence of an endogenous RRP
gene that results in a decrease of RRP function, preferably such that RRP
expression is undetectable or insignificant. Knock-out animals are typically
generated by homologous recombination with a vector comprising a transgene
having at least a portion of the gene to be knocked out. Typically a
deletion, addition or substitution has been introduced into the transgene to
functionally disrupt it. The transgene can be a human gene (e.g., from a
human genomic clone) but more preferably is an ortholog of the human gene
derived from the transgenic host species. For example, a mouse RRP gene is
used to construct a homologous recombination vector suitable for altering an
endogenous RRP gene in the mouse genome as shown in Example VII. Detailed
methodologies for homologous recombination in mice are available (see
Capecchi, Science (1989) 244:1288-1292; Joyner et al., Nature (1989)
338:153-156). Procedures for the production of non-rodent transgenic mammals
and other animals are also available (Houdebine and Chourrout, supra; Pursel
et al., Science (1989) 244:1281-1288; Simms et al., Bio/Technology (1988)
6:179-183). In a preferred embodiment, knock-out animals, such as mice
harboring a knockout of a specific gene, may be used to produce antibodies
against the human counterpart of the gene that has been knocked out (Claesson
M H et al. (1994) Scand J Immunol 40:257-264; Declerck P J, et al., (1995) J
Biol Chem 270:8397-8400).
In another embodiment, the transgenic animal is a "knock-in" animal having
an alteration in its genome that results in altered expression (e.g.,
increased (including ectopic) or decreased expression) of the RRP gene,
e.g., by introduction of additional copies of RRP, or by operatively
inserting a regulatory sequence that provides for altered expression of an
endogenous copy of the RRP gene. Such regulatory sequences include
inducible, tissue-specific, and constitutive promoters and enhancer
elements. The knock-in can be homozygous or heterozygous.
Transgenic nonhuman animals can also be produced that contain selected
systems allowing for regulated expression of the transgene. One example of
such a system that may be produced is the cre/loxP recombinase system of
bacteriophage P1 (Lakso et al., PNAS (1992) 89:6232-6236; U.S. Pat. No.
4,959,317). If a cre/loxP recombinase system is used to regulate expression
of the transgene, animals containing transgenes encoding both the Cre
recombinase and a selected protein are required. Such animals can be
provided through the construction of "double" transgenic animals, e.g., by
mating two transgenic animals, one containing a transgene encoding a
selected protein and the other containing a transgene encoding a recombinase.
Another example of a recombinase system is the FLP recombinase system of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (O'Gorman et al. (1991) Science 251:1351-1355; U.S.
Pat. No. 5,654,182). In a preferred embodiment, both Cre-LoxP and Flp-Frt
are used in the same system to regulate expression of the transgene, and for
sequential deletion of vector sequences in the same cell, such as shown in
Example VII.
The genetically modified animals can be used in genetic studies to further
elucidate the p53 or p21 pathway, as animal models of disease and disorders
implicating defective p53 or p21 function, and for in vivo testing of
candidate therapeutic agents, such as those identified in the screens
described below. Gene targeting in mice is an ideal method to investigate
the function of a distinct protein in wild type and disease states. Further,
animal models deficient in rhomboid RRP sequence and function are desirable
tools for modulating the EGFR signaling pathway, for testing the effect of
candidate compounds against RRP, and for production of antibodies against
human RRP, among others. The candidate therapeutic agents are administered
to a genetically modified animal having altered RRP function and phenotypic
changes are compared with appropriate control animals such as genetically
modified animals that receive placebo treatment, and/or animals with
unaltered RRP expression that receive candidate therapeutic agent.
In additional to the above-described genetically modified animals having
altered RRP function, animal models having defective p53 or p21 function
(and otherwise normal RRP function), can be used in the methods of the
present invention. For example, a p53 or p21 knockout mouse can be used to
assess, in vivo, the activity of a candidate p53 or p21 modulatory agent
identified in one of the in vitro assays described below. p53 or p21
knockout mice are described in the literature (p53: Jacks et al., Nature
2001;410:1111-1116, 1043-1044; Donehower et al., supra; p21:Umanoff H, et
al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA Feb. 28, 1995; 92(5):1709-13).
Modulating Agents
The invention provides methods to identify agents that interact with and/or
modulate the function of RRP and/or the p53 or p21 pathway. Such agents are
useful in a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic applications associated
with the p53 or p21 pathways, as well as in further analysis of the RRP
protein and its contribution to the p53 or p21 pathways. Accordingly, the
invention also provides methods for modulating the p53 or p21 pathway
comprising the step of specifically modulating RRP activity by administering
an RRP-interacting or -modulating agent.
In a preferred embodiment, RRP-modulating agents inhibit or enhance RRP
activity or otherwise affect normal RRP function, including transcription,
protein expression, protein localization, and cellular or extra-cellular
activity. In a further preferred embodiment, the candidate p53 or p21
pathway-modulating agent specifically modulates the function of the RRP. The
phrases "specific modulating agent", "specifically modulates", etc., are
used herein to refer to modulating agents that directly bind to the RRP
polypeptide or nucleic acid, and preferably inhibit, enhance, or otherwise
alter, the function of the RRP. The term also encompasses modulating agents
that alter the interaction of the RRP with a binding partner or substrate
(e.g. by binding to a binding partner of an RRP, or to a protein/binding
partner complex, and inhibiting function).
Preferred RRP-modulating agents include small molecule compounds; RRP-interacting
proteins, including antibodies and other biotherapeutics; antisense and RNA
inhibitors. The modulating agents may be formulated in pharmaceutical
compositions, for example, as compositions that may comprise other active
ingredients, as in combination therapy, and/or suitable carriers or
excipients. Techniques for formulation and administration of the compounds
may be found in "Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences" Mack Publishing Co.,
Easton, Pa., 19th edition.
Small Molecule Modulators
Small molecules, are often preferred to modulate function of proteins with
enzymatic function, and/or containing protein interaction domains. Chemical
agents, referred to in the art as "small molecule" compounds are typically
organic, non-peptide molecules, having a molecular weight less than 10,000,
preferably less than 5,000, more preferably less than 1,000, and most
preferably less than 500. This class of modulators includes chemically
synthesized molecules, for instance, compounds from combinatorial chemical
libraries. Synthetic compounds may be rationally designed or identified
based on known or inferred properties of the RRP protein or may be
identified by screening compound libraries. Alternative appropriate
modulators of this class are natural products, particularly secondary
metabolites from organisms such as plants or fungi, which can also be
identified by screening compound libraries for RRP-modulating activity.
Methods for generating and obtaining compounds are well known in the art
(Schreiber S L, Science (2000) 151: 1964-1969; Radmann J and Gunther J,
Science (2000) 151:1947-1948).
Small molecule modulators identified from screening assays, as described
below, can be used as lead compounds from which candidate clinical compounds
may be designed, optimized, and synthesized. Such clinical compounds may
have utility in treating pathologies associated with the p53 or p21 pathway.
The activity of candidate small molecule modulating agents may be improved
several-fold through iterative secondary functional validation, as further
described below, structure determination, and candidate modulator
modification and testing. Additionally, candidate clinical compounds are
generated with specific regard to clinical and pharmacological properties.
For example, the reagents may be derivatized and re-screened using in vitro
and in vivo assays to optimize activity and minimize toxicity for
pharmaceutical development.
Protein Modulators
Specific RRP-interacting proteins are useful in a variety of diagnostic and
therapeutic applications related to the p53 or p21 pathway and related
disorders, as well as in validation assays for other RRP-modulating agents.
In a preferred embodiment, RRP-interacting proteins affect normal RRP
function, including transcription, protein expression, protein localization,
and cellular or extra-cellular activity. In another embodiment, RRP-interacting
proteins are useful in detecting and providing information about the
function of RRP proteins, as is relevant to p53 or p21 related disorders,
such as cancer (e.g., for diagnostic means).
An RRP-interacting protein may be endogenous, i.e. one that naturally
interacts genetically or biochemically with an RRP, such as TGFα, EGF,
amphiregulin, heregulin, a member of the RRP pathway that modulates RRP
expression, localization, and/or activity. RRP-modulators include dominant
negative forms of RRP-interacting proteins and of RRP proteins themselves.
Yeast two-hybrid and variant screens offer preferred methods for identifying
endogenous RRP-interacting proteins (Finley, R. L. et al. (1996) in DNA
Cloning-Expression Systems: A Practical Approach, eds. Glover D. & Hames B.
D (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England), pp. 169-203; Fashema S F et
al., Gene (2000) 250:1-14; Drees B L Curr Opin Chem Biol (1999) 3:64-70;
Vidal M and Legrain P Nucleic Acids Res (1999) 27:919-29; and U.S. Pat. No.
5,928,868). Mass spectrometry is an alternative preferred method for the
elucidation of protein complexes (reviewed in, e.g., Pandley A and Mann M,
Nature (2000) 405:837-846; Yates J R 3rd, Trends Genet (2000)
16:5-8).
An RRP-interacting protein may be an exogenous protein, such as an RRP-specific
antibody or a T-cell antigen receptor (see, e.g., Harlow and Lane (1988)
Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). RRP
antibodies are further discussed below.
In preferred embodiments, an RRP-interacting protein specifically binds an
RRP protein. In alternative preferred embodiments an RRP-modulating agent
binds an RRP substrate, binding partner, or cofactor.
Antibodies
In another embodiment, the protein modulator is an RRP specific antibody
agonist or antagonist. The antibodies have therapeutic and diagnostic
utilities, and can be used in screening assays to identify RRP modulators.
For example, uses for antibodies include the detection of an RRP protein in
a biological sample and the inhibition of RRP activity, for instance, to
block the development of an oncogenic disorder. The antibodies can also be
used in dissecting the portions of the RRP pathway responsible for various
cellular responses and in the general processing and maturation of the RRP.
Antibodies that specifically bind RRP polypeptides can be generated using
known methods. Preferably the antibody is specific to a mammalian ortholog
of RRP polypeptide, and more preferably, to human RRP. Antibodies may be
polyclonal, monoclonal (mAbs), humanized or chimeric antibodies, single
chain antibodies, Fab fragments, F(ab′).sub.2 fragments, fragments produced
by a FAb expression library, anti-idiotypic (anti-Id) antibodies, and
epitope-binding fragments of any of the above. Monoclonal antibodies with
affinities of 108 M-1 preferably 109 M-1
to 1010 M-1, or stronger can be made by standard
procedures as described (Harlow and Lane, Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual,
CSH Laboratory (1988); Goding (1986) Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and
Practice (2d ed) Academic Press, New York; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,381,292;
4,451,570; and 4,618,577). Antibodies may be generated against crude cell
extracts of RRP or substantially purified fragments thereof. If RRP
fragments are used, they preferably comprise at least 10, and more
preferably, at least 20 contiguous amino acids of an RRP protein. In a
particular embodiment, RRP-specific antigens and/or immunogens are coupled
to carrier proteins that stimulate the immune response. For example, the
subject polypeptides are covalently coupled to the keyhole limpet hemocyanin
(KLH) carrier, and the conjugate is emulsified in Freund's complete
adjuvant, which enhances the immune response. An appropriate immune system
such as a laboratory rabbit or mouse is immunized according to conventional
protocols. In a preferred embodiment, due to close similarity of RRP
sequences from mice and humans, transgenic mice that are RRP deficient or
RRP knockout, such as those generated in the present invention (Example
VIII), are used to produce antibodies against human RRP.
The presence of RRP-specific antibodies is assayed by an appropriate assay
such as a solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) using
immobilized corresponding RRP polypeptides. Other assays, such as
radioimmunoassays or fluorescent assays might also be used.
Chimeric antibodies specific to RRP polypeptides can be made that contain
different portions from different animal species. For instance, a human
immunoglobulin constant region may be linked to a variable region of a
murine mAb, such that the antibody derives its biological activity from the
human antibody, and its binding specificity from the murine fragment.
Chimeric antibodies are produced by splicing together genes that encode the
appropriate regions from each species (Morrison et al., Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. (1984) 81:6851-6855; Neuberger et al., Nature (1984) 312:604-608;
Takeda et al., Nature (1985) 31:452-454). Humanized antibodies, which are a
form of chimeric antibodies, can be generated by grafting
complementary-determining regions (CDRs) (Carlos, T. M., J. M. Harlan. 1994.
Blood 84:2068-2101) of mouse antibodies into a background of human framework
regions and constant regions by recombinant DNA technology (Riechmann L M,
et al., 1988 Nature 323: 323-327). Humanized antibodies contain ˜10% murine
sequences and ˜90% human sequences, and thus further reduce or eliminate
immunogenicity, while retaining the antibody specificities (Co MS, and Queen
C. 1991 Nature 351: 501-501; Morrison S L. 1992 Ann. Rev. Immun.
10:239-265). Humanized antibodies and methods of their production are
well-known in the art (U.S. Pat. No. 5,530,101; U.S. Pat. No. 5,585,089;
U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,762, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,180,370).
RRP-specific single chain antibodies which are recombinant, single chain
polypeptides formed by linking the heavy and light chain fragments of the Fv
regions via an amino acid bridge, can be produced by methods known in the
art (U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778; Bird, Science (1988) 242:423-426; Huston et
al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1988) 85:5879-5883; and Ward et al., Nature
(1989) 334:544-546).
Other suitable techniques for antibody production involve in vitro exposure
of lymphocytes to the antigenic polypeptides or alternatively to selection
of libraries of antibodies in phage or similar vectors (Huse et al., Science
(1989) 246:1275-1281). As used herein, T-cell antigen receptors are included
within the scope of antibody modulators (Harlow and Lane, 1988, supra).
The polypeptides and antibodies of the present invention may be used with or
without modification. Frequently, antibodies will be labeled by joining,
either covalently or non-covalently, a substance that provides for a
detectable signal, or that is toxic to cells that express the targeted
protein (Menard S, et al., Int J. Biol Markers (1989) 4:131-134). A wide
variety of labels and conjugation techniques are known and are reported
extensively in both the scientific and patent literature. Suitable labels
include radionuclides, enzymes, substrates, cofactors, inhibitors,
fluorescent moieties, fluorescent emitting lanthanide metals,
chemiluminescent moieties, bioluminescent moieties, magnetic particles, and
the like (U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,817,837; 3,850,752; 3,939,350; 3,996,345;
4,277,437; 4,275,149; and 4,366,241). Also, recombinant immunoglobulins may
be produced (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567). Antibodies to cytoplasmic
polypeptides may be delivered and reach their targets by conjugation with
membrane-penetrating toxin proteins (U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,900).
When used therapeutically in a patient, the antibodies of the subject
invention are typically administered parenterally, when possible at the
target site, or intravenously. The therapeutically effective dose and dosage
regimen is determined by clinical studies. Typically, the amount of antibody
administered is in the range of about 0.1 mg/kg—to about 10 mg/kg of patient
weight. For parenteral administration, the antibodies are formulated in a
unit dosage injectable form (e.g., solution, suspension, emulsion) in
association with a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle. Such vehicles are
inherently nontoxic and non-therapeutic. Examples are water, saline,
Ringer's solution, dextrose solution, and 5% human serum albumin. Nonaqueous
vehicles such as fixed oils, ethyl oleate, or liposome carriers may also be
used. The vehicle may contain minor amounts of additives, such as buffers
and preservatives, which enhance isotonicity and chemical stability or
otherwise enhance therapeutic potential. The antibodies' concentrations in
such vehicles are typically in the range of about 1 mg/ml-to about 10 mg/ml.
Immunotherapeutic methods are further described in the literature (U.S. Pat.
No.5,859,206; WO0073469).
The selection of an appropriate antibody subclass for therapy will depend
upon the nature of the tumor antigen. For example, an IgM may be preferred
when the antigen is highly specific for the tumor target and rarely occurs
on normal cells. However, the IgG subclass may be preferred when the
tumor-associated antigen is also expressed in normal tissues, even at much
lower levels. The binding of at least two IgG molecules in close proximity
is required to activate complement, a serum protein that combines with
antibodies to form a defense against cellular antigens. The normal tissues
that express smaller amounts of the antigen and bind fewer IgG molecules may
thus incur less complement-mediated damage. Furthermore, since IgGs are
smaller than IgMs, they may more readily localize to tumor tissue.
Immune responses may assist in the delivery or efficacy of an anti-tumor
treatment. There is evidence that complement activation leads to an
inflammatory response and macrophage activation (Uananue and Benecerraf,
Textbook of Immunology, 2nd Edition, Williams & Wilkins, p. 218 (1984)).
Activated macrophages more preferentially destroy tumor cells than normal
cells (Fidler and Poste, Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 5, 161 (1982)). Also,
the increased vasodilation accompanying inflammation may increase the
ability of anti-cancer agents, such as chemotherapeutic drugs or
radiolabeled antibodies to localize in tumors. While a significant detriment
of standard chemotherapy or radiation treatment is damage to healthy cells,
the antigen-antibody combinations specified by this invention may circumvent
many of the problems normally caused by the heterogeneity of tumor cell
populations. Additionally, purified antigens (Hakomori, Ann. Rev. Immunol.
(1984) 2:103) or the related anti-idiotypic antibodies (Nepom et al., Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci, (1985) 81:2864; Koprowski et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
(1984) 81:216) which recognize the hypervariance among the same epitopes in
different individuals could be used to induce an active immune response in
human cancer patients. Such a response includes the formation of antibodies
capable of activating human complement and mediating antibody-dependent
cell-mediated cytotoxicity and by such mechanisms cause tumor destruction.
Specific Biotherapeutics
In a preferred embodiment, an RRP-interacting protein may have
biotherapeutic applications. Biotherapeutic agents formulated in
pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and dosages may be used to activate or
inhibit signal transduction pathways. This modulation may be accomplished by
binding a ligand, thus inhibiting the activity of the pathway; or by binding
a receptor, either to inhibit activation of, or to activate, the receptor.
Alternatively, the biotherapeutic may itself be a ligand capable of
activating or inhibiting a receptor. Biotherapeutic agents and methods of
producing them are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,146,628.
Since RRP is a receptor, its ligand(s), antibodies to the ligand(s) or the
RRP itself may be used as biotherapeutics to modulate the activity of RRP in
the p53 or p21 pathway.
Nucleic Acid Modulators
Other preferred RRP-modulating agents comprise nucleic acid molecules, such
as antisense oligomers or double stranded RNA (dsRNA), which generally
inhibit RRP activity.
Preferred antisense oligomers that interfere with the function of the RRP
nucleic acid such as DNA replication, transcription, translocation of the
RRP RNA to the site of protein translation, translation of protein from the
RRP RNA, splicing of the RRP RNA to yield one or more mRNA species, and
catalytic activity which may be engaged in or facilitated by the RRP RNA.
Double-stranded RNA inhibition (dsRNAi) is another preferred RRP-modulating
agent. For convenience, the term "antisense modulator", as used herein,
includes antisense oligomers and dsRNAi.
In one embodiment, the antisense oligomer is an oligonucleotide that is
sufficiently complementary to an RRP mRNA to bind to and prevent
translation, preferably by binding to the 5′ untranslated region. RRP-specific
antisense oligonucleotides, preferably range from at least 6 to about 200
nucleotides. In some embodiments the oligonucleotide is preferably at least
10, 15, or 20 nucleotides in length. In other embodiments, the
oligonucleotide is preferably less than 50, 40, or 30 nucleotides in length.
The oligonucleotide can be DNA or RNA or a chimeric mixture or derivatives
or modified versions thereof, single-stranded or double-stranded. The
oligonucleotide can be modified at the base moiety, sugar moiety, or
phosphate backbone. The oligonucleotide may include other appending groups
such as peptides, agents that facilitate transport across the cell membrane,
hybridization-triggered cleavage agents, and intercalating agents.
In another embodiment, the antisense oligomer is a phosphothioate morpholino
oligomer (PMO). PMOs are assembled from four different morpholino subunits,
each of which contain one of four genetic bases (A, C, G, or T) linked to a
six-membered morpholine ring. Polymers of these subunits are joined by
non-ionic phosphodiamidate intersubunit linkages. Details of how to make and
use PMOs and other antisense oligomers are well known in the art (e.g. see
WO99/18193; Probst J C, Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotide and Ribozyme Design,
Methods. (2000) 22(3):271-281; Summerton J, and Weller D. 1997 Antisense
Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. ;7:187-95, U.S. Pat. No. 5,235,033; and U.S. Pat. No.
5,378,841).
Antisense oligomers are commonly used as research reagents, diagnostics, and
therapeutics. For example, antisense oligonucleotides, which are able to
inhibit gene expression with exquisite specificity, are often used to
elucidate the function of particular genes (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No.
6,165,790). Antisense oligomers are also used, for example, to distinguish
between functions of various members of a biological pathway. Antisense
oligomers have been employed as therapeutic moieties in the treatment of
disease states in animals and man and have been demonstrated in numerous
clinical trials to be safe and effective (Milligan J F, et al, Current
Concepts in Antisense Drug Design, J Med Chem. (1993) 36:1923-1937;
Tonkinson J L et al., Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides as Clinical
Therapeutic Agents, Cancer Invest. (1996) 14:54-65). Accordingly, in one
aspect of the invention, an RRP-specific antisense oligomer is used in an
assay to further elucidate the role of the RRP in the p53 or p21 pathway,
and/or its relationship to other members of the pathway. In another aspect
of the invention, an RRP-specific antisense oligomer is used as a
therapeutic agent for treatment of p53 or p21-related disease states.
Alternative preferred RRP-modulating agents are double-stranded RNA species
mediating RNA interference (RNAi). RNAi is the process of sequence-specific,
post-transcriptional gene silencing in animals and plants, initiated by
double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) that is homologous in sequence to the silenced
gene. Methods relating to the use of RNAi to silence genes in C. elegans,
Drosophila, plants, and humans are known in the art (Fire A, et al.,
1998 Nature 391:806-811; Fire, A. Trends Genet. 15, 358-363 (1999); Sharp,
P. A. RNA interference 2001. Genes Dev. 15, 485-490 (2001); Hammond, S. M.,
et al., Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 110-1119 (2001); Tuschl, T. Chem. Biochem. 2,
239-245 (2001); Hamilton, A. et al., Science 286, 950-952 (1999); Hammond,
S. M., et al., Nature 404, 293-296 (2000); Zamore, P. D., et al., Cell 101,
25-33 (2000); Bernstein, E., et al., Nature 409, 363-366 (2001); Elbashir,
S. M., et al., Genes Dev. 15, 188-200 (2001); WO0129058; WO9932619; Elbashir
S M, et al., 2001 Nature 411:494-498).
Assay Systems
The invention provides assay systems for identifying specific modulators of
RRP activity. As used herein, an "assay system" encompasses all the
components required for performing and analyzing results of an assay that
detects and/or measures a particular event. In general, primary assays are
used to identify or confirm a modulator's specific biochemical or molecular
effect with respect to the RRP nucleic acid or protein. In general,
secondary assays further assess the activity of a RRP modulating agent
identified by a primary assay and may confirm that the modulating agent
affects RRP in a manner relevant to the p53 or p21 pathway. In some cases,
RRP modulators will be directly tested in a secondary assay.
In a preferred embodiment, the screening method comprises contacting a
suitable assay system comprising an RRP polypeptide with a candidate agent
under conditions whereby, but for the presence of the agent, the system
provides a reference activity (e.g. protease activity), which is based on
the particular molecular event the screening method detects. A statistically
significant difference between the agent-biased activity and the reference
activity indicates that the candidate agent modulates RRP activity, and
hence the p53 or p21 pathway.
Primary Assays
The type of modulator tested generally determines the type of primary assay.
Primary Assays for Small Molecule Modulators
For small molecule modulators, screening assays are used to identify
candidate modulators. Screening assays may be cell-based or may use a
cell-free system that recreates or retains the relevant biochemical reaction
of the target protein (reviewed in Sittampalam G S et al., Curr Opin Chem
Biol (1997) 1:384-91 and accompanying references). As used herein the term
"cell-based" refers to assays using live cells, dead cells, or a particular
cellular fraction, such as a membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, or
mitochondrial fraction. The term "cell free" encompasses assays using
substantially purified protein (either endogenous or recombinantly
produced), partially purified cellular extracts, or crude cellular extracts.
Screening assays may detect a variety of molecular events, including
protein-DNA interactions, protein-protein interactions (e.g., receptor-ligand
binding), transcriptional activity (e.g., using a reporter gene), enzymatic
activity (e.g., via a property of the substrate), activity of second
messengers, immunogenicty and changes in cellular morphology or other
cellular characteristics. Appropriate screening assays may use a wide range
of detection methods including fluorescent, radioactive, colorimetric,
spectrophotometric, and amperometric methods, to provide a read-out for the
particular molecular event detected.
In a preferred embodiment, screening assays uses fluorescence technologies,
including fluorescence polarization, time-resolved fluorescence, and
fluorescence resonance energy transfer. These systems offer means to monitor
protein-protein or DNA-protein interactions in which the intensity of the
signal emitted from dye-labeled molecules depends upon their interactions
with partner molecules (e.g., Selvin P R, Nat Struct Biol (2000) 7:730-4;
Fernandes P B, Curr Opin Chem Biol (1998) 2:597-603; Hertzberg R P and Pope
A J, Curr Opin Chem Biol (2000) 4:445-451).
Cell-based screening assays usually require systems for recombinant
expression of RRP and any auxiliary proteins demanded by the particular
assay. Cell-free assays often use recombinantly produced purified or
substantially purified proteins. Appropriate methods for generating
recombinant proteins produce sufficient quantities of proteins that retain
their relevant biological activities and are of sufficient purity to
optimize activity and assure assay reproducibility. Yeast two-hybrid and
variant screens, and mass spectrometry provide preferred methods for
determining protein-protein interactions and elucidation of protein
complexes. In certain applications, when RRP-interacting proteins are used
in screens to identify small molecule modulators, the binding specificity of
the interacting protein to the RRP protein may be assayed by various known
methods such as substrate processing (e.g. ability of the candidate RRP-specific
binding agents to function as negative effectors in RRP-expressing cells),
binding equilibrium constants (usually at least about 107 M-1,
preferably at least about 108 M-1, more preferably at
least about 109 M-1), and immunogenicity (e.g. ability
to elicit RRP specific antibody in a heterologous host such as a mouse, rat,
goat or rabbit). For enzymes and receptors, binding may be assayed by,
respectively, substrate and ligand processing.
The screening assay may measure a candidate agent's ability to specifically
bind to or modulate activity of a RRP polypeptide, a fusion protein thereof,
or to cells or membranes bearing the polypeptide or fusion protein. The RRP
polypeptide can be full length or a fragment thereof that retains functional
RRP activity. The RRP polypeptide may be fused to another polypeptide, such
as a peptide tag for detection or anchoring, or to another tag. The RRP
polypeptide is preferably human or mouse RRP, or is an ortholog or
derivative thereof as described above. In a preferred embodiment, the
screening assay detects candidate agent-based modulation of RRP interaction
with a binding target, such as an endogenous or exogenous protein or other
substrate that has RRP-specific binding activity, and can be used to assess
normal RRP gene function.
Suitable assay formats that may be adapted to screen for RRP modulators are
known in the art. Preferred screening assays are high throughput or ultra
high throughput and thus provide automated, cost-effective means of
screening compound libraries for lead compounds (Fernandes P B, 1998, supra;
Sundberg S A, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2000, 11:47-53).
A variety of suitable assay systems may be used to identify candidate RRP
and p53 or p21 pathway modulators (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,020,135 (p53
modulation), U.S. Pat. No. 6,114,132 (phosphatase and protease assays)).
Specific preferred assays are described in more detail below.
Protease Assays. Proteases are enzymes that cleave protein substrates at
specific sites. Exemplary assays detect the alterations in the spectral
properties of an artificial substrate that occur upon protease-mediated
cleavage. In one example, synthetic caspase substrates containing four amino
acid proteolysis recognition sequences, separating two different fluorescent
tags are employed; fluorescence resonance energy transfer detects the
proximity of these fluorophores, which indicates whether the substrate is
cleaved (Mahajan N P et al., Chem Biol (1999) 6:401-409).
Endogenous protease inhibitors may inhibit protease activity. In an example
of an assay developed for either proteases or protease inhibitors, a
biotinylated substrate is coated on a titer plate and hydrolyzed with the
protease; the unhydrolyzed substrate is quantified by reaction with alkaline
phosphatase-streptavidin complex and detection of the reaction product. The
activity of protease inhibitors correlates with the activity of the alkaline
phosophatase indicator enzyme (Gan Z et al., Anal Biochem 1999)
268:151-156).
Apoptosis assays. Assays for apoptosis may be performed by terminal
deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated digoxigenin-11-dUTP nick end labeling
(TUNEL) assay. The TUNEL assay is used to measure nuclear DNA fragmentation
characteristic of apoptosis (Lazebnik et al., 1994, Nature 371, 346), by
following the incorporation of fluorescein-dUTP (Yonehara et al., 1989, J.
Exp. Med. 169, 1747). Apoptosis may further be assayed by acridine orange
staining of tissue culture cells (Lucas, R., et al., 1998, Blood
15:4730-41). An apoptosis assay system may comprise a cell that expresses an
RRP, and that optionally has defective p53 or p21 function (e.g. p53 or p21
is over-expressed or under-expressed relative to wild-type cells). A test
agent can be added to the apoptosis assay system and changes in induction of
apoptosis relative to controls where no test agent is added, identify
candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents. In some embodiments of the
invention, an apoptosis assay may be used as a secondary assay to test a
candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents that is initially identified using a
cell-free assay system. An apoptosis assay may also be used to test whether
RRP function plays a direct role in apoptosis. For example, an apoptosis
assay may be performed on cells that over- or under-express RRP relative to
wild type cells. Differences in apoptotic response compared to wild type
cells suggests that the RRP plays a direct role in the apoptotic response.
Apoptosis assays are described further in U.S. Pat. No. 6,133,437.
Cell proliferation and cell cycle assays. Cell proliferation may be assayed
via bromodeoxyuridine (BRDU) incorporation. This assay identifies a cell
population undergoing DNA synthesis by incorporation of BRDU into
newly-synthesized DNA. Newly-synthesized DNA may then be detected using an
anti-BRDU antibody (Hoshino et al., 1986, Int. J. Cancer 38, 369; Campana et
al., 1988, J. Immunol. Meth. 107, 79), or by other means.
Cell Proliferation may also be examined using [3H]-thymidine
incorporation (Chen, J., 1996, Oncogene 13:1395-403; Jeoung, J., 1995, J.
Biol. Chem. 270:18367-73). This assay allows for quantitative
characterization of S-phase DNA syntheses. In this assay, cells synthesizing
DNA will incorporate [3H]-thymidine into newly synthesized DNA.
Incorporation can then be measured by standard techniques such as by
counting of radioisotope in a scintillation counter (e.g., Beckman L S 3800
Liquid Scintillation Counter).
Cell proliferation may also be assayed by colony formation in soft agar (Sambrook
et al., Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor (1989)). For example, cells
transformed with RRP are seeded in soft agar plates, and colonies are
measured and counted after two weeks incubation.
Involvement of a gene in the cell cycle may be assayed by flow cytometry.
Cells transfected with an RRP may be stained with propidium iodide and
evaluated in a flow cytometer (available from Becton Dickinson).
Accordingly, a cell proliferation or cell cycle assay system may comprise a
cell that expresses an RRP, and that optionally has defective p53 or p21
function (e.g. p53 or p21 is over-expressed or under-expressed relative to
wild-type cells). A test agent can be added to the assay system and changes
in cell proliferation or cell cycle relative to controls where no test agent
is added, identify candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents. In some
embodiments of the invention, the cell proliferation or cell cycle assay may
be used as a secondary assay to test a candidate p53 or p21 modulating
agents that is initially identified using another assay system such as a
cell-free kinase assay system. A cell proliferation assay may also be used
to test whether RRP function plays a direct role in cell proliferation or
cell cycle. For example, a cell proliferation or cell cycle assay may be
performed on cells that over- or under-express RRP relative to wild type
cells. Differences in proliferation or cell cycle compared to wild type
cells suggests that the RRP plays a direct role in cell proliferation or
cell cycle. A cell proliferation assay may also be used to identify
candidate agents that modulate cell proliferation. For example, cells that
have decreased expression of RRP or that are RRP knockouts, such as mouse
cells generated in the present invention (Example VIII) are treated with
candidate agents. Changes in cell proliferation relative to control cells
where no agent is added indicate that the candidate agent modulates cell
proliferation.
Angiogenesis. Angiogenesis may be assayed using various human endothelial
cell systems, such as umbilical vein, coronary artery, or dermal cells.
Suitable assays include Alamar Blue based assays (available from Biosource
International) to measure proliferation; migration assays using fluorescent
molecules, such as the use of Becton Dickinson Falcon HTS FluoroBlock cell
culture inserts to measure migration of cells through membranes in presence
or absence of angiogenesis enhancer or suppressors; and tubule formation
assays based on the formation of tubular structures by endothelial cells on
Matrigel® (Becton Dickinson). Accordingly, an angiogenesis assay system may
comprise a cell that expresses an RRP, and that optionally has defective p53
or p21 function (e.g. p53 or p21 is over-expressed or under-expressed
relative to wild-type cells). A test agent can be added to the angiogenesis
assay system and changes in angiogenesis relative to controls where no test
agent is added, identify candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents. In some
embodiments of the invention, the angiogenesis assay may be used as a
secondary assay to test a candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents that is
initially identified using another assay system. An angiogenesis assay may
also be used to test whether RRP function plays a direct role in cell
proliferation. For example, an angiogenesis assay may be performed on cells
that over- or under-express RRP relative to wild type cells. Differences in
angiogenesis compared to wild type cells suggests that the RRP plays a
direct role in angiogenesis.
Hypoxic induction. The alpha subunit of the transcription factor, hypoxia
inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), is upregulated in tumor cells following exposure
to hypoxia in vitro. Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1 stimulates the
expression of genes known to be important in tumor cell survival, such as
those encoding glyolytic enzymes and VEGF. Induction of such genes by
hypoxic conditions may be assayed by growing cells transfected with RRP in
hypoxic conditions (such as with 0.1% O2, 5% CO2, and balance N2, generated
in a Napco 7001 incubator (Precision Scientific)) and normoxic conditions,
followed by assessment of gene activity or expression by Taqman®. For
example, a hypoxic induction assay system may comprise a cell that expresses
an RRP, and that optionally has a mutated p53 or p21 (e.g. p53 or p21 is
over-expressed or under-expressed relative to wild-type cells). A test agent
can be added to the hypoxic induction assay system and changes in hypoxic
response relative to controls where no test agent is added, identify
candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents. In some embodiments of the
invention, the hypoxic induction assay may be used as a secondary assay to
test a candidate p53 or p21 modulating agents that is initially identified
using another assay system. A hypoxic induction assay may also be used to
test whether RRP function plays a direct role in the hypoxic response. For
example, a hypoxic induction assay may be performed on cells that over- or
under-express RRP relative to wild type cells. Differences in hypoxic
response compared to wild type cells suggest that the RRP plays a direct
role in hypoxic induction.
Cell adhesion. Cell adhesion assays measure adhesion of cells to purified
adhesion proteins, or adhesion of cells to each other, in presence or
absence of candidate modulating agents.
Cell-protein adhesion assays measure the ability of agents to modulate the
adhesion of cells to purified proteins. For example, recombinant proteins
are produced, diluted to 2.5 g/mL in PBS, and used to coat the wells of a
microtiter plate. The wells used for negative control are not coated. Coated
wells are then washed, blocked with 1% BSA, and washed again. Compounds are
diluted to 2× final test concentration and added to the blocked, coated
wells. Cells are then added to the wells, and the unbound cells are washed
off. Retained cells are labeled directly on the plate by adding a
membrane-permeable fluorescent dye, such as calcein-AM, and the signal is
quantified in a fluorescent microplate reader.
Cell-cell adhesion assays measure the ability of agents to modulate binding
of cell adhesion proteins with their native ligands. These assays use cells
that naturally or recombinantly express the adhesion protein of choice. In
an exemplary assay, cells expressing the cell adhesion protein are plated in
wells of a multiwell plate. Cells expressing the ligand are labeled with a
membrane-permeable fluorescent dye, such as BCECF, and allowed to adhere to
the monolayers in the presence of candidate agents. Unbound cells are washed
off, and bound cells are detected using a fluorescence plate reader.
High-throughput cell adhesion assays have also been described. In one such
assay, small molecule ligands and peptides are bound to the surface of
microscope slides using a microarray spotter, intact cells are then
contacted with the slides, and unbound cells are washed off. In this assay,
not only the binding specificity of the peptides and modulators against cell
lines are determined, but also the functional cell signaling of attached
cells using immunofluorescence techniques in situ on the microchip is
measured (Falsey J R et al., Bioconjug Chem. 2001 May-Jun;12(3):346-53).
Certain screening assays may also be used to test antibody and nucleic acid
modulators; for nucleic acid modulators, appropriate assay systems involve
RRP mRNA expression.
Primary Assays for Antibody Modulators
For antibody modulators, appropriate primary assays test is a binding assay
that tests the antibody's affinity to and specificity for the RRP protein.
Methods for testing antibody affinity and specificity are well known in the
art (Harlow and Lane, 1988, 1999, supra). The enzyme-linked immunosorbant
assay (ELISA) is a preferred method for detecting RRP-specific antibodies;
others include FACS assays, radioimmunoassays, and fluorescent assays.
Primary Assays for Nucleic Acid Modulators
For nucleic acid modulators, primary assays may test the ability of the
nucleic acid modulator to inhibit or enhance RRP gene expression, preferably
mRNA expression. In general, expression analysis comprises comparing RRP
expression in like populations of cells (e.g., two pools of cells that
endogenously or recombinantly express RRP) in the presence and absence of
the nucleic acid modulator. Methods for analyzing mRNA and protein
expression are well known in the art. For instance, Northern blotting, slot
blotting, ribonuclease protection, quantitative RT-PCR (e.g., using the
TaqMan®, PE Applied Biosystems), or microarray analysis may be used to
confirm that RRP mRNA expression is reduced in cells treated with the
nucleic acid modulator (e.g., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (1994)
Ausubel F M et al., eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., chapter 4; Freeman W M et
al., Biotechniques (1999) 26:112-125; Kallioniemi O P, Ann Med 2001,
33:142-147; Blohm D H and Guiseppi-Elie, A Curr Opin Biotechnol 2001,
12:41-47). Protein expression may also be monitored. Proteins are most
commonly detected with specific antibodies or antisera directed against
either the RRP protein or specific peptides. A variety of means including
Western blotting, ELISA, or in situ detection, are available (Harlow E and
Lane D, 1988 and 1999, supra).
Secondary Assays
Secondary assays may be used to further assess the activity of RRP-modulating
agent identified by any of the above methods to confirm that the modulating
agent affects RRP in a manner relevant to the p53 or p21 pathway. As used
herein, RRP-modulating agents encompass candidate clinical compounds or
other agents derived from previously identified modulating agent. Secondary
assays can also be used to test the activity of a modulator on a particular
genetic or biochemical pathway or to test the specificity of the modulator's
interaction with RRP.
Secondary assays generally compare like populations of cells or animals
(e.g., two pools of cells or animals that endogenously or recombinantly
express RRP) in the presence and absence of the candidate modulator. In
general, such assays test whether treatment of cells or animals with a
candidate RRP-modulating agent results in changes in the p53 or p21 pathway
in comparison to untreated (or mock- or placebo-treated) cells or animals.
Certain assays use "sensitized genetic backgrounds", which, as used herein,
describe cells or animals engineered for altered expression of genes in the
p53 or p21 or interacting pathways.
Cell-based Assays
Cell based assays may use a variety of mammalian cell lines known to have
defective p53 or p21 function (e.g. for p53: SAOS-2 osteoblasts, H1299 lung
cancer cells, C33A and HT3 cervical cancer cells, HT-29 and DLD-1 colon
cancer cells, among others, and for p21: HCT116 colon cancer cells, among
others, available from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas,
Va.). Cell based assays may detect endogenous p53 or p21 pathway activity or
may rely on recombinant expression of p53 or p21 pathway components. Any of
the aforementioned assays may be used in this cell-based format. Candidate
modulators are typically added to the cell media but may also be injected
into cells or delivered by any other efficacious means.
Animal Assays
A variety of non-human animal models of normal or defective p53 or p21
pathway may be used to test candidate RRP modulators. Models for defective
p53 or p21 pathway typically use genetically modified animals that have been
engineered to mis-express (e.g., over-express or lack expression in) genes
involved in the p53 or p21 pathway. Assays generally require systemic
delivery of the candidate modulators, such as by oral administration,
injection, etc.
In a preferred embodiment, p53 or p21 pathway activity is assessed by
monitoring neovascularization and angiogenesis. Animal models with defective
and normal p53 or p21 are used to test the candidate modulator's affect on
RRP in Matrigel® assays. Matrigel® is an extract of basement membrane
proteins, and is composed primarily of laminin, collagen IV, and heparin
sulfate proteoglycan. It is provided as a sterile liquid at 4° C., but
rapidly forms a solid gel at 37° C. Liquid Matrigel® is mixed with various
angiogenic agents, such as bFGF and VEGF, or with human tumor cells which
over-express the RRP. The mixture is then injected subcutaneously into the
female athymic nude mice (Taconic, Germantown, N.Y.) to support an intense
vascular response. Mice with Matrigel® pellets may be dosed via oral (PO),
intraperitoneal (IP), or intravenous (IV) routes with the candidate
modulator. Mice are euthanized 5-12 days post-injection, and the Matrigel®
pellet is harvested for hemoglobin analysis (Sigma plasma hemoglobin kit).
Hemoglobin content of the gel is found to correlate the degree of
neovascularization in the gel.
In another preferred embodiment, the effect of the candidate modulator on
RRP is assessed via tumorigenicity assays. In one example, xenograft human
tumors are implanted subcutaneously (SC) into female athumic nude mice, 6-7
week old, as single cell suspensions either from a pre-existing tumor or
from in vitro culture. The tumors which express the RRP endogenously are
injected in the flank, 1×105 to 1×107 cells per mouse
in a volume of 100 μL using a 27 gauge needle. Mice are then ear tagged and
tumors are measured twice weekly. Candidate modulator treatment is initiated
on the day the mean tumor weight reaches 100 mg. Candidate modulator is
delivered intravenously (IV), subcutaneously (SC), intraperitoneously (IP),
or orally (PO) by bolus administration. Depending upon the pharmacokinetics
(PK) of each unique candidate modulator, dosing can be performed multiple
times per day. The tumor weight is assessed by measuring perpendicular
diameters with a caliper and calculated by multiplying the measurements of
diameters in two dimensions. At the end of the experiment, the excised
tumors maybe utilized for biomarker identification or further analyses. For
immunohischemistry staining, xenograft tumors are fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde, 0.1M phosphate, PH 7.2, for 6 hours at 4° C., immersed in
30% sucrose in PBS, and rapidly frozen in isopetane cooled with liquid
nitrogen.
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Uses
Specific RRP-modulating agents are useful in a variety of diagnostic and
therapeutic applications where disease or disease prognosis is related to
defects in the p53 or p21 pathway, such as angiogenic, apoptotic, or cell
proliferation disorders. Accordingly, the invention also provides methods
for modulating the p53 or p21 pathway in a cell, preferably a cell
pre-determined to have defective p53 or p21 function, comprising the step of
administering an agent to the cell that specifically modulates RRP activity.
The discovery that RRP is implicated in p53 or p21 pathway provides for a
variety of methods that can be employed for the diagnostic and prognostic
evaluation of diseases and disorders involving defects in the p53 or p21
pathway and for the identification of subjects having a predisposition to
such diseases and disorders.
Various expression analysis methods can be used to diagnose whether RRP
expression occurs in a particular sample, including Northern blotting, slot
blotting, ribonuclease protection, quantitative RT-PCR, and microarray
analysis. (e.g., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (1994) Ausubel F M
et al., eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., chapter 4; Freeman W M et al.,
Biotechniques (1999) 26:112-125; Kallioniemi O P, Ann Med 2001, 33:142-147;
Blohm and Guiseppi-Elie, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2001, 12:41-47). Tissues
having a disease or disorder implicating defective p53 or p21 signaling that
express an RRP, are identified as amenable to treatment with an RRP
modulating agent. In a preferred application, the p53 or p21 defective
tissue overexpresses an RRP relative to normal tissue. For example, a
Northern blot analysis of mRNA from tumor and normal cell lines, or from
tumor and matching normal tissue samples from the same patient, using full
or partial RRP cDNA sequences as probes, can determine whether particular
tumors express or overexpress RRP. Alternatively, the TaqMan® is used for
quantitative RT-PCR analysis of RRP expression in cell lines, normal tissues
and tumor samples (PE Applied Biosystems).
Various other diagnostic methods may be performed, for example, utilizing
reagents such as the RRP oligonucleotides, and antibodies directed against
an RRP, as described above for: (1) the detection of the presence of RRP
gene mutations, or the detection of either over- or under-expression of RRP
mRNA relative to the non-disorder state; (2) the detection of either an
over- or an under-abundance of RRP gene product relative to the non-disorder
state; and (3) the detection of perturbations or abnormalities in the signal
transduction pathway mediated by RRP.
Thus, in a specific embodiment, the invention is drawn to a method for
diagnosing a disease in a patient, the method comprising: a) obtaining a
biological sample from the patient; b) contacting the sample with a probe
for RRP expression; c) comparing results from step (b) with a control; and
d) determining whether step (c) indicates a likelihood of disease. The
probe may be either DNA or protein, including an antibody.
Claim 1 of 5 Claims
1. A method of screening for agents that modulates the interaction of
Rhomboid Related Protein (RRP) polypeptide with an RRP binding target
comprising:
a) expressing a recombinant polypeptide,
b) incubating the recombinant RRP polypeptide with an RRP binding target
and a candidate RRP modulating agent, and
c) determining whether said candidate RRP modulating agent modulates the
binding of RRP polypeptide with the RRP binding target,
wherein RRP is SEQ ID No: 2 (RRP1).
____________________________________________
If you want to learn more
about this patent, please go directly to the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office Web site to access the full
patent.
|