|
|

Link:
Pharm/Biotech Resources
Title: Proteins producing an altered immunogenic
response and methods of making and using the same
United States Patent: 6,897,049
Issued: May 24, 2005
Inventors: Estell; David A. (San Mateo, CA); Harding; Fiona
A. (Santa Clara, CA)
Assignee: Genencor International, Inc. (Palo Alto, CA)
Appl. No.: 768080
Filed: January 23, 2001
Abstract
The present invention relates to a novel methods and compositions for
producing hyper and hypo allergenic compositions. Specifically, the present
invention comprises neutralizing or reducing the ability of T-cells to
recognize epitopes and thus prevent sensitization of an individual to the
protein. Alternatively, T-cell epitopes are mutated to produce increased
immunogenic reactions.
Description of the Invention
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Proteins used in industrial, pharmaceutical and commercial applications
are of increasing prevalence. As a result, the increased exposure due to
this prevalence has been responsible for some safely hazards caused by the
sensitization of certain persons to those peptides, whereupon subsequent
exposure causes extreme allergic reactions which can be injurious and even
fatal. For example, proteases are known to cause dangerous hypersensitivity
in some individuals. As a result, despite the usefulness of proteases in
industry, e.g., in laundry detergents, cosmetics, textile treatment etc.,
and the extensive research performed in the field to provide improved
proteases which have, for example, more effective stain removal under
detergency conditions; the use of proteases in industry has been problematic
due to their ability to produce a hypersensitive allergenic response in some
humans.
Much work has been done to alleviate these problems. Among the strategies
explored to reduce immunogenic potential of protease use have been improved
production processes which reduce potential contact by controlling and
minimizing workplace concentrations of dust particles or aerosol carrying
airborne protease, improved granulation processes which reduce the amount of
dust or aerosol actually produced from the protease product, and improved
recovery processes to reduce the level of potentially allergenic
contaminants in the final product. However, efforts to reduce the
allergenicity of protease, per se, have been relatively unsuccessful.
Alternatively, efforts have been made to mask epitopes in protease which are
recognized by immunoglobulin E (IgE) in hypersensitive individuals (PCT
Publication No. WO 92/10755) or to enlarge or change the nature of the
antigenic determinants by attaching polymers or peptides/proteins to the
problematic protease.
When an adaptive immune response occurs in an exaggerated or inappropriate
form, the individual experiencing the reaction is said to be hypersensitive.
Hypersensitivity reactions are the result of normally beneficial immune
responses acting inappropriately and sometimes cause inflammatory reactions
and tissue damage. They can be provoked by many antigens; and the cause of a
hypersensitivity reaction will vary from one individual to the next.
Hypersensitivity does not normally manifest itself upon first contact with
the antigen, but usually appears upon subsequent contact. One form of
hypersensitivity occurs when an IgE response is directed against innocuous
environmental antigens, such as pollen, dust-mites or animal dander. The
resulting release of pharmacological mediators by IgE-sensitized mast cells
produces an acute inflammatory reaction with symptoms such as asthma or
rhinitis.
Nonetheless, a strategy comprising modifying the IgE sites will not
generally be successful in preventing the cause of the initial sensitization
reaction. Accordingly, such strategies, while perhaps neutralizing or
reducing the severity of the subsequent hypersensitivity reaction, will not
reduce the number or persons actually sensitized. For example, when a person
is known to be hypersensitive to a certain antigen, the general, and only
safe, manner of dealing with such a situation is to isolate the
hypersensitive person from the antigen as completely as possible. Indeed,
any other course of action would be dangerous to the health of the
hypersensitive individual. Thus, while reducing the danger of a specific
protein for a hypersensitive individual is important, for industrial
purposes it would be far more valuable to render a protein incapable of
initiating the hypersensitivity reaction in the first place.
T-lymphocytes (T-cells) are key players in the induction and regulation of
immune responses and in the execution of immunological effector functions.
Specific immunity against infectious agents and tumors is known to be
dependent on these cells and they are believed to contribute to the healing
of injuries. On the other hand, failure to control these responses can lead
to auto aggression. In general, antigen is presented to T-cells in the form
of antigen presenting cells which, through a variety of cell surface
mechanisms, capture and display antigen or partial antigen in a manner
suitable for antigen recognition by the T-cell. Upon recognition of a
specific epitope by the receptors on the surface of the T-cells (T-cell
receptors), the T-cells begin a series of complex interactions, including
proliferation, which result in the production of antibody by B-cells. While
T-cells and B-cells are both activated by antigenic epitopes which exist on
a given protein or peptide, the actual epitopes recognized by these
mononuclear cells are generally not identical. In fact, the epitope which
activates a T-cell to initiate the creation of immunologic diversity is
quite often not the same epitope which is later recognized by B-cells in the
course of the immunologic response. Thus, with respect to hypersensitivity,
while the specific antigenic interaction between the T-cell and the antigen
is a critical element in the initiation of the immune response to antigenic
exposure, the specifics of that interaction, i.e., the epitope recognized,
is often not relevant to subsequent development of a full blown allergic
reaction.
PCT Publication No. WO 96/40791 discloses a process for producing
polyalkylene oxide-polypeptide conjugates with reduced allergenicity using
polyalkylene oxide as a starting material.
PCT Publication No. WO 97/30148 discloses a polypeptide conjugate with
reduced allergenicity which comprises one polymeric carrier molecule having
two or more polypeptide molecules coupled covalently thereto.
PCT Publication No. WO 96/17929 discloses a process for producing
polypeptides with reduced allergenicity comprising the step of conjugating
from 1 to 30 polymolecules to a parent polypeptide.
PCT Publication No. WO 92/10755 discloses a method of producing protein
variants evoking a reduced immunogenic response in animals. In this
application, the proteins of interest, a series of proteases and variants
thereof, were used to immunize rats. The sera from the rats was then used to
measure the reactivity of the polyclonal antibodies already produced and
present in the immunized sera to the protein of interest and variants
thereof. From these results, it was possible to determine whether the
antibodies in the preparation were comparatively more or less reactive with
the protein and its variants, thus permitting an analysis of which changes
in the protein are likely to neutralize or reduce the ability of the Ig
bind. From these tests on rats, the conclusion was arrived at that changing
any of subtilisin 309 residues corresponding to 127, 128, 129, 130, 131,
151, 136, 151, 152, 153, 154, 161, 162, 163, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172,
173, 174, 175, 176, 186, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 247, 251, 261 will result
in a change in the immunological potential.
PCT Publication No. WO 94/10191 discloses low allergenic proteins comprising
oligomeric forms of the parent monomeric protein, wherein the oligomer has
substantially retained its activity.
While some studies have provided methods of reducing the allergenicity of
certain proteins and identification of epitopes which cause allergic
reactions in some individuals, the assays used to identify these epitopes
generally involve measurement of IgE and IgG antibody in blood sera
previously exposed to the antigen. However, once an Ig reaction has been
initiated, sensitization has already occurred. Accordingly, there is a need
for a method of determining epitopes which cause sensitization in the first
place, as neutralization of these epitopes will result in significantly less
possibility for sensitization to occur, thus reducing the possibility of
initial sensitization. There is also a need to produce proteins which
produce an enhanced immunogenic response, and a need to identify naturally
occurring proteins which produce a low immunogenic response. This invention
meets these and other needs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides proteins which produce immunogenic
responses as desired, methods of identifying and making such proteins, and
methods of using such proteins. For example, as will be become apparent from
the detailed description below, the methods and compositions provided herein
are useful in forming hyper- and hypo-allergenic compositions. As used
herein, hyper and hypo means the composition produces a greater or lesser
immunogenic response, respectively, than the same composition without the
proteins of the present invention. Such compositions may include cleaning
compositions, textile treatments, contact lens cleaning solutions or
products, peptide hydrolysis products, waste treatment products, cosmetic
formulations including for skin, hair and oral care, pharmaceuticals such as
blood clot removal products, research products such as enzymes and
therapeutics including vaccines.
In one aspect of the invention, a polypeptide of interest is selected and
provided herein. The polypeptide of interest is preferably one having a
T-cell epitope and is then varied as described below. However, polypeptides
of interest may also be selected based on naturally occurring properties and
not altered. Moreover, polypeptides of interest may be selected which do not
have a T-cell epitope, and altered so as to have a T-cell epitope.
In one aspect of the invention provided herein is a variant of a polypeptide
of interest comprising a T-cell epitope. The variant differs from the
polypeptide of interest by having an altered T-cell epitope such that said
variant and said polypeptide produce different immunogenic responses in an
individual. The variant can be prepared and selected to produce either a
greater or lesser immunogenic response than said polypeptide of interest.
The polypeptide of interest can be any polypeptide of interest. In one
aspect, the polypeptide is selected from the group consisting of enzymes,
hormones, factors, vaccines and cytokines. In one embodiment, the
polypeptide of interest is not recognized by said individual as endogenous
to said individual, or not recognized as "self". As indicated herein, the
polypeptide of interest may be an enzyme. In one embodiment, the enzyme is
selected from the group consisting of lipase, cellulase, endo-glucosidase H,
protease, carbohydrase, reductase, oxidase, isomerase, transferase, kinase
and phosphatase. In preferred embodiments, the polypeptide of interest and
the variant of said polypeptide of interest each comprise at least some of
the same activity. For example, if a variant of a protease is provided, said
variant will produce an altered immunogenic response, but will retain
detectable, and preferably comparable, protease activity.
Wherein a variant of a polypeptide of interest is provided, the T-cell
epitope may be altered in a number of ways including by amino acid
substitutions, deletions, additions and combinations thereof. Preferably,
the T-cell epitope is altered by having amino acid substitutions. In one
embodiment herein, the amino acid substitutions are made to corresponding
amino acids of a homolog of the polypeptide of interest, wherein the homolog
does not comprise the same T-cell epitope in the corresponding position as
the polypeptide of interest. In one aspect, the terminal portion of the
polypeptide of interest comprising at least one T-cell epitope is replaced
with a corresponding terminal portion of the homolog of the polypeptide of
interest, wherein the replacement produces said different immunogenic
response.
In another embodiment provided herein, the nucleic acids encoding the
polypeptides producing the desired immunogenic response are provided herein.
Moreover, the invention includes expression vectors and host cells
comprising the nucleic acids provided herein. Moreover, once the
polypeptides and variants thereof of the present invention are identified,
substantially homologous sequences of or those sequences which hybridize to
the polypeptides and variants can be identified and are provided herein.
Homologous is further defined below, and can refer to similarity or
identity, with identity being preferred. Preferably, the homologous
sequences are amino acid sequences or nucleic acids encoding peptides having
the activity of the polypeptides and variants provided herein.
In yet another aspect of the invention is a method for determining the
immunogenic response produced by a protein. In one embodiment, the method
comprises (a) obtaining from a single blood source a solution of dendritic
cells and a solution of naïve CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cells; (b) promoting
differentiation in said solution of dendritic cells; (c) combining said
solution of differentiated dendritic cells and said naïve CD4+ and/or CD8+
T-cells with said protein; and (d) measuring the proliferation of T-cells in
said step (c).
The methods of determining immunogenic responses produced by proteins can
also be used to identify comparative immunogenic responses of proteins.
Therefore, in one aspect, the method of determining immunogenic responses of
proteins further comprises comparing immunogenic responses of one or more
proteins. The proteins can be homologs of each other, variants of the same
protein, different types of the same protein, for example, different
proteases, or different peptides of the same protein.
The invention further provides a method of altering the immunogenicity of a
polypeptide of interest comprising determining the immunogenicity of said
polypeptide; identifying a T-cell epitope in a said polypeptide; and
altering said T-cell epitope so as to alter the immunogencity of said
polypeptide. As described herein, said altering can be done by altering a
single amino acid or switching a portion of the polypeptide of interest with
a corresponding portion of a homolog, wherein the switch produces an altered
immunogenic response.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, a method for identifying T-cell
epitopes is provided. Moreover, proteins including naturally occurring
proteins which have relatively impotent or potent T-cell epitopes or no
T-cell epitopes may be identified in accordance with the methods of the
present invention. Thus, the present invention allows the identification and
production of proteins which produce immunogenic responses as desired,
including naturally occurring proteins as well as proteins which have been
mutated to produce the appropriate response. It is understood that the terms
protein, polypeptide and peptide are sometimes used herein interchangeably.
Wherein a peptide is a portion of protein, the skilled artisan can
understand this by the context in which the term is used.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides an assay which identifies
epitopes and non-epitopes as follows: differentiated dendritic cells are
combined with naïve human CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cells and with a peptide of
interest. More specifically, a method is provided wherein a T-cell epitope
is recognized comprising the steps of: (a) obtaining from a single blood
source a solution of dendritic cells and a solution of naïve CD4+ and/or
CD8+ T-cells; (b) promoting differentiation in said solution of dendritic
cells; (c) combining said solution of differentiated dendritic cells and
said naïve CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cells with a peptide of interest; (d)
measuring the proliferation of T-cells in said step (c).
In one embodiment, the peptide of interest to be analyzed is derived from a
polypeptide of interest. In the practice of the invention, it is possible to
identify with precision the location of an epitope which can cause
sensitization in an individual or sampling of individuals. In a preferred
embodiment of the invention, a series of peptide oligomers which correspond
to all or part of the polypeptide of interest are prepared. For example, a
peptide library is produced covering the relevant portion or all of the
protein. In one embodiment, the manner of producing the peptides is to
introduce overlap into the peptide library, for example, producing a first
peptide corresponds to amino acid sequence 1-10 of the subject protein, a
second peptide corresponds to amino acid sequence 4-14 of the subject
protein, a third peptide corresponds to amino acid sequence 7-17 of the
subject protein, a fourth peptide corresponds to amino acid sequence 10-20
of the subject protein etc. until representative peptides corresponding to
the entire molecule are created. By analyzing each of the peptides
individually in the assay provided herein, it is possible to precisely
identify the location of epitopes recognized by T-cells. In the example
above, the greater reaction of one specific peptide than its neighbors' will
facilitate identification of the epitope anchor region to within three amino
acids. After determining the location of these epitopes, it is possible to
alter the amino acids within each epitope until the peptide produces a
different T-cell response from that of the original protein. Alternatively,
the epitope may be used in its original form to stimulate an immune response
against a target, e.g. infectious agent or tumor cell. Moreover, proteins
may be identified herein which have desired high or low T-cell epitope
potency which may be used in their naturally occurring forms.
Antigen presenting cell as used herein means a cell of the immune system
which present antigen on their surface which is recognizable by receptors on
the surface of T-cells. Examples of antigen presenting cells are dendritic
cells, interdigitating cells, activated B-cells and macrophages.
"T-cell proliferation" as used herein means the number of T-cells produced
during the incubation of T-cells with the antigen presenting cells, with or
without antigen.
"Baseline T-cell proliferation" as used herein means T-cell proliferation
which is normally seen in an individual in response to exposure to antigen
presenting cells in the absence of peptide or protein antigen. For the
purposes herein, the baseline T-cell proliferation level was determined on a
per sample basis for each individual as the proliferation of T-cells in
response to antigen presenting cells in the absence of antigen.
"T-cell epitope" means a feature of a peptide or protein which is recognized
by a T-cell receptor in the initiation of an immunologic response to the
peptide comprising that antigen. Recognition of a T-cell epitope by a T-cell
is generally believed to be via a mechanism wherein T-cells recognize
peptide fragments of antigens which are bound to class I or class II major
histocompatability (MHC) molecules expressed on antigen-presenting cells
(see e.g., Moeller. G. ed., "Antigenic Requirements for Activation of MHC-Restricted
Responses," Immunological Review, Vol. 98, p. 187 (Copenhagen;
Munksgaard) (1987).
"Sample" as used herein comprises mononuclear cells which are naïve, i.e.,
not sensitized, to the antigen in question.
"Homolog" as used herein means a protein or enzyme which has similar
catalytic action, structure and/or use as the protein of interest. For
purposes of this invention, a homolog and a protein of interest are not
necessarily related evolutionarily, e.g., same functional protein from
different species. It is desirable to find a homolog that has a tertiary
and/or primary structure similar to the protein of interest as replacement
of the epitope in the protein of interest with an analogous segment from the
homolog will reduce the disruptiveness of the change. Thus, closely
homologous enzymes will provide the most desirable source of epitope
substitutions. Alternatively, if possible, it is advantageous to look to
human analogs for a given protein. For example, substituting a specific
epitope in a bacterial subtilisin with a sequence from a human analog to
subtilisin (i.e., human subtilisin) should result in less allergenicity in
the bacterial protein.
An "analogous" sequence may be determined by ensuring that the replacement
amino acids show a similar function, the tertiary structure and/or conserved
residues to the amino acids in the protein of interest at or near the
epitope. Thus, where the epitope region contains, for example, an
alpha-helix or a beta-sheet structure, the replacement amino acids should
maintain that specific structure.
The epitopes determined according to the assay provided herein are then
modified to reduce or augment the immunologic potential of the protein of
interest. In a preferred embodiment, the epitope to be modified produces a
level of T-cell proliferation of greater than three times the baseline
T-cell proliferation in a sample. When modified, the epitope produces less
than three times the baseline proliferation, preferably less than two times
the baseline proliferation and most preferably less than or substantially
equal to the baseline proliferation in a sample.
Preferably, the epitope is modified in one of the following ways: (a) the
amino acid sequence of the epitope is substituted with an analogous sequence
from a human homolog to the protein of interest; (b) the amino acid sequence
of the epitope is substituted with an analogous sequence from a non-human
homolog to the protein of interest, which analogous sequence produces a
lesser immunogenic, e.g., allergenic, response due to T-cell epitope
recognition than that of the protein of interest; (c) the amino acid
sequence of the epitope is substituted with a sequence which substantially
mimics the major tertiary structure attributes of the epitope, but which
produces a lesser immunogenic, e.g., allergenic, response due to T-cell
epitope recognition than that of the protein of interest; or (d) with any
sequence which produces lesser immunogenic, e.g., allergenic, response due
to T-cell epitope recognition than that of the protein of interest.
However, one of skill will readily recognize that epitopes can be modified
in other ways depending on the desired outcome. For example, if a T-cell
vaccine is desired, it is contemplated the amino acid sequence of an epitope
will be substituted with amino acids which increase the immulogic response
to the peptide via enhanced MHC binding and/or T-cell recognition. In
another example, if altering an autoimmune response against self-antigens is
desired, it is contemplated the amino acid sequence of an epitope will be
substituted with amino acids that decrease or cause a shift in an
inflammatory or other immune response.
The present invention extends to all proteins against which it is desired to
modulate the immunogenic response, for example, peptides to be used as
T-cell vaccines, or peptides or proteins to be used as therapeutic agents
against, e.g., cancer, infectious diseases and autoimmune diseases. One of
skill in the art will readily recognize the proteins and peptides of this
invention are not necessarily native proteins and peptides. Indeed, in one
embodiment of this invention, the assay described herein is used to
determine the immunologic response of proteins from shuffled genes. For
descriptions of gene shuffling and expression of such genes see, Stemmer,
Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 91:10747 (1994); Patten, et al., Current
Opinion in Biotechnol. 8:724 (1997); Kuchner & Arnold, Trends
Biotechnol. 15:523 (1997); Moore, et al., J. Mol, Biol. 272:336
(1997); Zhao, et al., Nature Biotechnol. 16:258 (1998); Giver, et
al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 95:12809 (1998); Harayama, Trends
Biotechnol. 16:76 (1998); Lin, et at., Biotechnol. Prog. 15:467
(1999); and Sun, J. Comput. Biol. 6:77 (1999). The assay is used to
predict the immunologic response of proteins encoded by shuffled genes. Once
determined, the protein can be altered to modulate the immunolgic response
to that protein.
In addition to the above proteins and peptides, the present invention can be
used to reduce the allergenicity of proteins. These proteins include, but
are not limited to, glucanases, lipases, cellulases, endo-glucosidase Hs (endo-H),
proteases, carbohydrases, reductases, oxidases, isomerases, transferases,
kinases, phosphatases, amylases, etc. In addition to reducing the
allergenicity to an animal, such as a human, of naturally occurring amino
acid sequences, this invention encompasses reducing the allergenicity of a
mutated human protein, e.g., a protein that has been altered to change the
functional activity of the protein. In many instances, the mutation of human
proteins to e.g., increase activity, results in the incorporation of new
T-cell epitope in the mutated protein. The assay of this invention can be
used to determine the presence of the new T-cell epitope and determine
substitute amino acids that will reduce the allergenicity of the mutated
protein. Although this invention encompasses the above proteins and many
others, for the sake of simplicity, the following will describe a
particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the modification of
protease. Proteases are carbonyl hydrolases which generally act to cleave
peptide bonds of proteins or peptides. As used herein, "protease" means a
naturally-occurring protease or a recombinant protease. Naturally-occurring
proteases include a-aminoacylpeptide hydrolase, peptidylamino acid hydrolase,
acylamino hydrolase, serine carboxypeptidase, metallocarboxypeptidase, thiol
proteinase, carboxylproteinase and metalloproteinase. Serine, metallo, thiol
and acid proteases are included, as well as endo and exo-proteases.
In one embodiment herein, hybrid polypeptides are provided. "Hybrid
polypeptides" are proteins engineered from at least two different proteins,
which are preferably homologs of one another. For example, a preferred
hybrid polypeptide might have the N-terminus of a protein and the C-terminus
of a homolog of the protein. In a preferred embodiment, the two terminal
ends can be combined to correspond to the full-length active protein. In a
preferred embodiment, the homologs share substantial similarity but do not
have identical T-cell epitopes. Therefore, in one embodiment, for example, a
polypeptide of interest having one or more T-cell epitopes in the C-terminus
may have the C-terminus replaced with the C-terminus of a homolog having a
less potent T-cell epitope in the C-terminus, less T-cell epitopes, or no
T-cell epitope in the C-terminus. Thus, the skilled artisan understands that
by being able to identify T-cell epitopes among homologs, a variety of
variants producing different immunogenic responses can be formed. Moreover,
it is understood that internal portions, and more than one homolog can be
used to produce the variants of the present invention.
More generally, the variants provided herein can be derived from the
precursor amino acid sequence by the substitution, deletion, insertion, or
combination thereof of one or more amino acids of the precursor amino acid
sequence. Such modification is preferably of the "precursor DNA sequence"
which encodes the amino acid sequence of the precursor enzyme, but can be by
the manipulation of the precursor protein. Suitable methods for such
manipulation of the precursor DNA sequence include methods disclosed herein,
as well as methods known to those skilled in the art (see, for example, EP 0
328299, WO89/06279 and the U.S. patents and applications already referenced
herein).
Subtilisins are bacterial or fungal proteases which generally act to cleave
peptide bonds of proteins or peptides. As used herein, "subtilisin" means a
naturally-occurring subtilisin or a recombinant subtilisin. A series of
naturally-occurring subtilisins is known to be produced and often secreted
by various microbial species. Amino acid sequences of the members of this
series are not entirely homologous. However, the subtilisins in this series
exhibit the same or similar type of proteolytic activity. This class of
serine proteases shares a common amino acid sequence defining a catalytic
triad which distinguishes them from the chymotrypsin related class of serine
proteases. The subtilisins and chymotrypsin related serine proteases both
have a catalytic triad comprising aspartate, histidine and serine. In the
subtilisin related proteases the relative order of these amino acids,
reading from the amino to carboxy terminus, is aspartate-histidine-serine.
In the chymotrypsin related proteases, the relative order, however, is
histidine-aspartate-serine. Thus, subtilisin herein refers to a serine
protease having the catalytic triad of subtilisin related proteases.
"Recombinant", "recombinant subtilisin" or "recombinant protease" refer to a
subtilisin or protease in which the DNA sequence encoding the subtilisin or
protease is modified to produce a variant (or mutant) DNA sequence which
encodes the substitution, deletion or insertion of one or more amino acids
in the naturally-occurring amino acid sequence. Suitable methods to produce
such modification, and which may be combined with those disclosed herein,
include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,760,025 (RE 34,606), U.S. Pat.
No. 5,204,015 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,185,258.
"Non-human subtilisins" and the DNA encoding them may be obtained from many
procaryotic and eucaryotic organisms. Suitable examples of procaryotic
organisms include gram negative organisms such as E. coli or
Pseudomonas and gram positive bacteria such as Micrococcus or
Bacillus. Examples of eucaryotic organisms from which subtilisin and
their genes may be obtained include yeast such as Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, fungi such as Aspergillus sp.
"Human subtilisin" means proteins of human origin which have subtilisin type
catalytic activity, e.g., the kexin family of human derived proteases. An
example of such a protein is represented by the sequence in FIG. 7 (SEQ ID
NO: 208). Additionally, derivatives or homologs of proteins provided herein,
including those from non-human sources such as mouse or rabbit, which retain
the essential activity of the peptide, such as the ability to hydrolyze
peptide bonds, etc., have at least 50%, preferably at least 65% and most
preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, and sometimes as much
as 95 or 98% homology to the polypeptide of interest.
The amino acid position numbers used herein refer to those assigned to the
mature Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin sequence. The invention,
however, is not limited to the mutation of this particular subtilisin but
extends to precursor proteases containing amino acid residues at positions
which are "equivalent" to the particular identified residues in Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subtilisin. In a preferred embodiment of the present
invention, the precursor protease is Bacillus lentus subtilisin and
the substitutions, deletions or insertions are made at the equivalent amino
acid residue in B. lentus corresponding to those listed above.
A residue (amino acid) of a precursor protease is equivalent to a residue of
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin if it is either homologous
(i.e., corresponding in position in either primary or tertiary structure) or
analogous to a specific residue or portion of that residue in Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subtilisin (i.e., having the same or similar
functional capacity to combine, react, or interact chemically).
"Corresponding" as used herein generally refers to an analogous position
along the peptide.
In order to establish homology to primary structure, the amino acid sequence
of a precursor protease is directly compared to the Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subtilisin primary sequence and particularly to a set
of residues known to be invariant in subtilisins for which the sequence is
known. For example, "this patent" shows the conserved residues as between
B. amyloliquefaciens subtilisin and B. lentus subtilisin. After
aligning the conserved residues, allowing for necessary insertions and
deletions in order to maintain alignment (i.e., avoiding the elimination of
conserved residues through arbitrary deletion and insertion), the residues
equivalent to particular amino acids in the primary sequence of Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subtilisin are defined. Alignment of conserved
residues preferably should conserve 100% of such residues. However,
alignment of greater than 75% or as little as 50% of conserved residues is
also adequate to define equivalent residues. Conservation of the catalytic
triad, Asp32/His64/Ser221 should be maintained.
For example, the amino acid sequence of subtilisin from Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis (carlsbergensis)
and Bacillus lentus can be aligned to provide the maximum amount of
homology between amino acid sequences. A comparison of these sequences shows
that there are a number of conserved residues contained in each sequence.
The conserved residues as between BPN′ and B. lentus are identified
in "this patent".
These conserved residues, thus, may be used to define the corresponding
equivalent amino acid residues of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
subtilisin in other subtilisins such as subtilisin from Bacillus lentus
(PCT Publication No. WO89/06279 published Jul. 13, 1989), the preferred
protease precursor enzyme herein, or the subtilisin referred to as PB92 (EP
0 328 299), which is highly homologous to the preferred Bacillus lentus
subtilisin. The amino acid sequences of certain of these subtilisins are
aligned in FIGS. 3A and 3B (SEQ ID NOS: 3-6) with the sequence of
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (SEQ ID NO: 3) subtilisin to produce the
maximum homology of conserved residues. As can be seen, there are a number
of deletions in the sequence of Bacillus lentus (SEQ ID NO: 6) as
compared to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (SEQ ID NO: 3) subtilisin.
Thus, for example, the equivalent amino acid for Val165 in Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens (SEQ ID NO: 3) subtilisin in the other subtilisins is
isoleucine for B. lentus (SEQ ID NO: 6) and B. licheniformis (SEQ
ID NO: 5).
Thus, for example, the amino acid at position +170 is lysine (K) in both
B. amyloliquefaciens (SEQ ID NO: 3) and B. licheniformis (SEQ ID
NO: 5) subtilisins and arginine (R) in Savinase (SEQ ID NO: 6). In one
embodiment of the protease variants of the invention, however, the amino
acid equivalent to +170 in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin is
substituted with aspartic acid (D). The abbreviations and one letter codes
for all amino acids in the present invention conform to the PatentIn User
Manual (GenBank, Mountain View, Calif.) 1990, p. 101.
Homologous sequences can also be determined by using a "sequence comparison
algorithm." Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted,
e.g., by the local homology algorithm of Smith & Waterman, Adv. Appl.
Math. 2:482 (1981), by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman &
Wunsch, J. Mol. Biol. 48:443 (1970), by the search for similarity
method of Pearson & Lipman, Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444
(1988), by computerized implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT,
FASTA, and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics
Computer Group, 575 Science Dr., Madison, Wis.), or by visual inspection.
An example of an algorithm that is suitable for determining sequence
similarity is the BLAST algorithm, which is described in Altschul, et al.,
J. Mol. Biol. 215:403410 (1990) Software for performing BLAST
analyses is publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology
Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). This algorithm involves first
identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of
length W in the query sequence that either match or satisfy some
positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same
length in a database sequence. These initial neighborhood word hits act as
starling points to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are
expanded in both directions along each of the two sequences being compared
for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Extension of
the word hits is stopped when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by
the quantity X from a maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to
zero or below; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm
parameters W. T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment.
The BLAST program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, the BLOSUM62
scoring matrix (see Henikoff & Henikoff, Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA
89:10915 (1989)) alignments (B) of 50, expectation (E) of 10, M′5, N′-4, and
a comparison of both strands.
The BLAST algorithm then performs a statistical analysis of the similarity
between two sequences (see, e.g., Karlin & Altschul, Proc. Nat'l. Acad.
Sci. USA 90:5873-5787 (1993)). One measure of similarity provided by the
BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an
indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or
amino acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, an amino acid
sequence is considered similar to a protein such as a protease if the
smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test amino acid sequence to
a protein such as a protease amino acid sequence is less than about 0.1,
more preferably less than about 0.01, and most preferably less than about
0.001.
"Equivalent residues" may also be defined by determining homology at the
level of tertiary structure for a precursor protein whose tertiary structure
has been determined by x-ray crystallography. Equivalent residues are
defined as those for which the atomic coordinates of two or more of the main
chain atoms of a particular amino acid residue of the precursor protein such
as the protease and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin (N on N, CA
on CA, C on C and O on O) are within 0.13 nm and preferably 0.1 nm after
alignment. Alignment is achieved after the best model has been oriented and
positioned to give the maximum overlap of atomic coordinates of non-hydrogen
protein atoms of the protein such as the protease in question to the
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin. The best model is the
crystallographic model giving the lowest R factor for experimental
diffraction data at the highest resolution available. ##EQU1##
Equivalent residues which are functionally analogous to a specific residue
of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin are defined as those amino
acids of the precursor protein such as a protease which may adopt a
conformation such that they either alter, modify or contribute to protein
structure, substrate binding or catalysis in a manner defined and attributed
to a specific residue of the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin.
Further, they are those residues of the precursor protein, for example,
protease (for which a tertiary structure has been obtained by x-ray
crystallography) which occupy an analogous position to the extent that,
although the main chain atoms of the given residue may not satisfy the
criteria of equivalence on the basis of occupying a homologous position, the
atomic coordinates of at least two of the side chain atoms of the residue
lie with 0.13 nm of the corresponding side chain atoms of Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subtilisin. The coordinates of the three dimensional
structure of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin are set forth in
EPO Publication No. 0 251 446 (equivalent to U.S. Pat. No. 5,182,204, the
disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference) and can be used as
outlined above to determine equivalent residues on the level of tertiary
structure.
Some of the residues identified for substitution, insertion or deletion are
conserved residues whereas others are not. In the case of residues which are
not conserved, the replacement of one or more amino acids is limited to
substitutions which produce a variant which has an amino acid sequence that
does not correspond to one found in nature. In the case of conserved
residues, such replacements should not result in a naturally-occurring
sequence. The variants of the present invention include the mature forms of
protein variants, as well as the pro- and prepro-forms of such protein
variants. The prepro-forms are the preferred construction since this
facilitates the expression, secretion and maturation of the protein
variants.
"Prosequence" refers to a sequence of amino acids bound to the N-terminal
portion of the mature form of a protein which when removed results in the
appearance of the "mature" form of the protein. Many proteolytic enzymes are
found in nature as translational proenzyme products and, in the absence of
post-translational processing, are expressed in this fashion. A preferred
prosequence for producing protein variants such as protease variants is the
putative prosequence of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin,
although other prosequences may be used.
A "signal sequence" or "presequence" refers to any sequence of amino acids
bound to the N-terminal portion of a protein or to the N-terminal portion of
a proprotein which may participate in the secretion of the mature or pro
forms of the protein. This definition of signal sequence is a functional
one, meant to include all those amino acid sequences encoded by the
N-terminal portion of the protein gene which participate in the effectuation
of the secretion of protein under native conditions. The present invention
utilizes such sequences to effect the secretion of the protein variants as
defined herein. One possible signal sequence comprises the first seven amino
acid residues of the signal sequence from Bacillus subtilis
subtilisin fused to the remainder of the signal sequence of the subtilisin
from Bacillus lentus (ATCC 21536).
A "prepro" form of a protein variant consists of the mature form of the
protein having a prosequence operably linked to the amino terminus of the
protein and a "pre" or "signal" sequence operably linked to the amino
terminus of the prosequence.
"Expression vector" refers to a DNA construct containing a DNA sequence
which is operably linked to a suitable control sequence capable of effecting
the expression of said DNA in a suitable host. Such control sequences
include a promoter to effect transcription, an optional operator sequence to
control such transcription, a sequence encoding suitable mRNA ribosome
binding sites and sequences which control termination of transcription and
translation. The vector may be a plasmid, a phage particle, or simply a
potential genomic insert. Once transformed into a suitable host, the vector
may replicate and function independently of the host genome, or may, in some
instances, integrate into the genome itself. In the present specification,
"plasmid" and "vector" are sometimes used interchangeably as the plasmid is
the most commonly used form of vector at present. However, the invention is
intended to include such other forms of expression vectors which serve
equivalent functions and which are, or become, known in the art.
The "host cells" used in the present invention generally are procaryotic or
eucaryotic hosts which preferably have been manipulated by the methods
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,760,025 (RE 34,606) to render them incapable of
secreting enzymatically active endoprotease. A preferred host cell for
expressing protein is the Bacillus strain BG2036 which is deficient
in enzymatically active neutral protein and alkaline protease (subtilisin).
The construction of strain BG2036 is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No.
5,264,366. Other host cells for expressing protein include Bacillus
subtilis 1168 (also described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,760,025 (RE 34,606) and
U.S. Pat. No. 5,264,366, the disclosure of which are incorporated herein by
reference), as well as any suitable Bacillus strain such as B.
licheniformis, B. lentus, etc.
Host cells are transformed or transfected with vectors constructed using
recombinant DNA techniques. These techniques can be found in any molecular
biology practice guide, for example, Sambrook et al. Molecular Cloning-A
Laboratory Manual (2nd ed.) Vol. 1-3, Cold Springs Harbor Publishing (1989)
("Sambrook"); and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Ausubel et al.(eds.),
Current Protocols, a joint venture between Greene Publishing Associates,
Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1997 Supplement) ("Ausubel"). Such
transformed host cells are capable of either replicating vectors encoding
the protein variants or expressing the desired protein variant. In the case
of vectors which encode the pre- or prepro-form of the protein variant, such
variants, when expressed, are typically secreted from the host cell into the
host cell medium.
"Operably linked", when describing the relationship between two DNA regions,
simply means that they are functionally related to each other. For example,
a presequence is operably linked to a peptide if it functions as a signal
sequence, participating in the secretion of the mature form of the protein
most probably involving cleavage of the signal sequence. A promoter is
operably linked to a coding sequence if it controls the transcription of the
sequence; a ribosome binding site is operably linked to a coding sequence if
it is positioned so as to permit translation.
The genes encoding the naturally-occurring precursor protein may be obtained
in accord with the general methods known to those skilled in the art. The
methods generally comprise synthesizing labeled probes having putative
sequences encoding regions of the protein of interest, preparing genomic
libraries from organisms expressing the protein, and screening the libraries
for the gene of interest by hybridization to the probes. Positively
hybridizing clones are then mapped and sequenced.
"Hybridization"is used to analyze whether a given DNA fragment or gene
corresponds to a DNA sequence described herein and thus falls within the
scope of the present invention. Samples to be hybridized are electrophoresed
through an agarose gel (for example, 0.8% agarose) so that separation of DNA
fragments can be visualized by size. DNA fragments are typically visualized
by ethidium bromide staining. The gel may be briefly rinsed in distilled H2O
and subsequently depurinated in an appropriate solution (such as, for
example, 0.25M HCl) with gentle shaking followed by denaturation for 30
minutes (in, for example, 0.4 M NaOH) with gentle shaking. A renaturation
step may be included, in which the gel is placed in 1.5 M NaCl, 1 MTris, pH
7.0 with gentle shaking for 30 minutes.
The DNA should then be transferred onto an appropriate positively charged
membrane, for example, Maximum Strength Nytran Plus membrane (Schleicher &
Schuell, Keene, N.H.), using a transfer solution (such as, for example,
6×SSC (900 mM NaCl, 90 mM trisodium citrate). Once the transfer is complete,
generally after about 2 hours, the membrane is rinsed in e.g., 2×SSC
(2×SSC=300 mM NaCl, 30 mM trisodium citrate) and air dried at room
temperature. The membrane should then be prehybridized (for approximately 2
hours or more) in a suitable prehybridization solution (such as, for
example, an aqueous solution containing per 100 mL: 20-50 mL formamide, 25
mL of 20×SSPE (1×SSPE=0.18 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.7), 2.5 mL
of 20% SDS, and 1 mL of 10 mg/mL sheared herring or salmon sperm DNA). As
would be known to one of skill in the art, the amount of formamide in the
prehybridization solution may be varied depending on the nature of the
reaction obtained according to routine methods. Thus, a lower amount of
formamide may result in more complete hybridization in terms of identifying
hybridizing molecules than the same procedure using a larger amount of
formamide. On the other hand, a strong hybridization band may be more easily
visually identified by using more formamide.
A DNA probe that is complementary or is nearly complementary to the DNA
sequence of interest and is generally between 100 and 1000 bases in length
is labeled (using, for example, the Megaprime labeling system according to
the instructions of the manufacturer) to incorporate 32P in the DNA. The
labeled probe is denatured by heating to 95° C. for 5 minutes and
immediately added to the membrane and prehybridization solution. The
hybridization reaction should proceed for an appropriate time and under
appropriate conditions, for example, for 18 hours at 37° C. with gentle
shaking or rotating. The membrane is rinsed (for example, in 2×SSC/0.3% SDS)
and then washed in an appropriate wash solution with gentle agitation. The
stringency desired will be a reflection of the conditions under which the
membrane (filter) is washed.
Specifically, the stringency of a given reaction (i.e., the degree of
homology necessary for successful hybridization) will depend on the washing
conditions to which the filter is subjected after hybridization.
"Low-stringency" conditions as defined herein will comprise washing a filter
with a solution of 0.2×SSC/0.1% SDS at 20° C. for 15 minutes.
"High-stringency" conditions comprise a further washing step comprising
washing the filter a second time with a solution of 0.2×SSC/0.1% SDS at 37°
C. for 30 minutes.
After washing, the membrane is dried and the bound probe detected. If 32P or
another radioisotope is used as the labeling agent, the bound probe can be
detected by autoradiography. Other techniques for the visualization of other
probes are well-known to those of skill. The detection of a bound probe
indicates a nucleic acid sequence has the desired homology and is
encompassed within this invention.
The cloned protein is then used to transform a host cell in order to express
the protein. The protein gene is then ligated into a high copy number
plasmid. This plasmid replicates in hosts in the sense that it contains the
well-known elements necessary for plasmid replication: a promoter operably
linked to the gene in question (which may be supplied as the gene's own
homologous promoter if it is recognized, i.e., transcribed, by the host), a
transcription termination and polyadenylation region (necessary for
stability of the mRNA transcribed by the host from the protein gene in
certain eucaryotic host cells) which is exogenous or is supplied by the
endogenous terminator region of the protein gene and, desirably, a selection
gene such as an antibiotic resistance gene that enables continuous cultural
maintenance of plasmid-infected host cells by growth in
antibiotic-containing media. High copy number plasmids also contain an
origin of replication for the host, thereby enabling large numbers of
plasmids to be generated in the cytoplasm without chromosomal limitations.
However, it is within the scope herein to integrate multiple copies of the
protein gene into host genome. This is facilitated by procaryotic and
eucaryotic organisms which are particularly susceptible to homologous
recombination.
In one embodiment, the gene can be a natural gene such as that from B.
lentus or B. amyloliquefaciens. Alternatively, a synthetic gene
encoding a naturally-occurring or mutant precursor protein may be produced.
In such an approach, the DNA and/or amino acid sequence of the precursor
protein is determined. Multiple, overlapping synthetic single-stranded DNA
fragments are thereafter synthesized, which upon hybridization and ligation
produce a synthetic DNA encoding the precursor protein. An example of
synthetic gene construction is set forth in Example 3 of U.S. Pat. No.
5,204,015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Once the naturally-occurring or synthetic precursor protein gene has been
cloned, a number of modifications are undertaken to enhance the use of the
gene beyond synthesis of the naturally-occurring precursor protein. Such
modifications include the production of recombinant proteins as disclosed in
U.S. Pat. No. 4,760,025 (RE 34,606) and EPO Publication No. 0 251 446 and
the production of protein variants described herein.
The following cassette mutagenesis method may be used to facilitate the
construction of the protein variants of the present invention, although
other methods may be used. First, the naturally occurring gene encoding the
protein is obtained and sequenced in whole or in part. Then the sequence is
scanned for a point at which it is desired to make a mutation (deletion,
insertion or substitution) of one or more amino acids in the encoded enzyme.
The sequences flanking this point are evaluated for the presence of
restriction sites for replacing a short segment of the gene with an
oligonucleotide pool which when expressed will encode various mutants. Such
restriction sites are preferably unique sites within the protein gene so as
to facilitate the replacement of the gene segment. However, any convenient
restriction site which is not overly redundant in the protein gene may be
used, provided the gene fragments generated by restriction digestion can be
reassembled in proper sequence. If restriction sites are not present at
locations within a convenient distance from the selected point (from 10 to
15 nucleotides), such sites are generated by substituting nucleotides in the
gene in such a fashion that neither the reading frame nor the amino acids
encoded are changed in the final construction. Mutation of the gene in order
to change its sequence to conform to the desired sequence is accomplished by
M13 primer extension in accord with generally known methods. The task of
locating suitable flanking regions and evaluating the needed changes to
arrive at two convenient restriction site sequences is made routine by the
redundancy of the genetic code, a restriction enzyme map of the gene and the
large number of different restriction enzymes. Note that if a convenient
flanking restriction site is available, the above method need be used only
in connection with the flanking region which does not contain a site.
Once the naturally-occurring DNA or synthetic DNA is cloned, the restriction
sites flanking the positions to be mutated are digested with the cognate
restriction enzymes and a plurality of end termini-complementary
oligonucleotide cassettes are ligated into the gene. The mutagenesis is
simplified by this method because all of the oligonucleotides can be
synthesized so as to have the same restriction sites, and no synthetic
linkers are necessary to create the restriction sites.
In one aspect of the invention, the objective is to secure a variant protein
having altered allergenic potential as compared to the precursor protein,
since decreasing such potential enables safer use of the enzyme. While the
instant invention is useful to lower allergenic potential, the mutations
specified herein may be utilized in combination with mutations known in the
art to result altered thermal stability and/or altered substrate
specificity, modified activity or altered alkaline stability as compared to
the precursor.
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to altering the capability of
the T-cell epitope which includes residue positions 170-173 in Bacillus
lentus to induce T-cell proliferation. One particularly preferred
embodiment of the invention comprises making modification to either one or
all of R170D, Y171Q and/or N173D. Similarly, as discussed in detail above,
it is believed that the modification of the corresponding residues in any
protein will result in a the neutralization of a key T-cell epitope in that
protein. Thus, in combination with the presently disclosed mutations in the
region corresponding to amino acid residues 170-173, substitutions at
positions corresponding to N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D optionally in combination
with one or more substitutions selected from the group consisting of
positions corresponding to V68A, T213R, A232V, Q236H, Q245R, and T260A of
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin may be used, in addition to
decreasing the allergenic potential of the variant protein of the invention,
to modulate overall stability and/or proteolytic activity of the enzyme.
Similarly, the substitutions provided herein may be combined with mutation
at the Asparagine (N) in Bacillus lentus subtilisin at equivalent
position +76 to Aspartate (D) in combination with the mutations
S103A/V104I/G159D and optionally in combination with one or more
substitutions selected from the group consisting of positions corresponding
to V68A, T213R, A232V, Q236H, Q245R, and T260A of Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens subtilisin, to produce enhanced stability and/or
enhanced activity of the resulting mutant enzyme.
The most preferred embodiments of the invention include the following
specific combinations of substituted residues corresponding to positions:
N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S173D; V68A/N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/
K170D/Y171Q/S173D/Q236H; V68A/N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S173D/
Q236H/Q245R;
V68A/N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S173D/A232V/Q236H/Q245R; and
V68A/N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S173D/T213R/A232V/Q236H/Q245R/T260A
of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin. These substitutions
are preferably made in Bacillus lentus (recombinant or native-type)
subtilisin, although the substitutions may be made in any Bacillus
protein.
Based on the screening results obtained with the variant proteins, the noted
mutations noted above in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin are
important to the proteolytic activity, performance and/or stability of these
enzymes and the cleaning or wash performance of such variant enzymes.
Many of the protein variants of the invention are useful in formulating
various detergent compositions. A number of known compounds are suitable
surfactants useful in compositions comprising the protein mutants of the
invention. These include nonionic, anionic, cationic, anionic or
zwitterionic detergents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,404,128 to Barry J.
Anderson and U.S. Pat. No. 4,261,868 to Jiri Flora, et al. A suitable
detergent formulation is that described in Example 7 of U.S. Pat. No.
5,204,015 (previously incorporated by reference). The art is familiar with
the different formulations which can be used as cleaning compositions. In
addition to typical cleaning compositions, it is readily understood that the
protein variants of the present invention may be used for any purpose that
native or wild-type proteins are used. Thus, these variants can be used, for
example, in bar or liquid soap applications, dishcare formulations, contact
lens cleaning solutions or products, peptide hydrolysis, waste treatment,
textile applications, as fusion-cleavage enzymes in protein production, etc.
The variants of the present invention may comprise, in addition to decreased
allergenicity, enhanced performance in a detergent composition (as compared
to the precursor). As used herein, enhanced performance in a detergent is
defined as increasing cleaning of certain enzyme sensitive stains such as
grass or blood, as determined by usual evaluation after a standard wash
cycle.
Proteins, particularly proteases of the invention can be formulated into
known powdered and liquid detergents having pH between 6.5 and 12.0 at
levels of about 0.01 to about 5% (preferably 0.1% to 0.5%) by weight. These
detergent cleaning compositions can also include other enzymes such as known
proteases, amylases, cellulases, lipases or endoglycosidases, as well as
builders and stabilizers.
The addition of proteins, particularly proteases of the invention to
conventional cleaning compositions does not create any special use
limitation. In other words, any temperature and pH suitable for the
detergent is also suitable for the present compositions as long as the pH is
within the above range, and the temperature is below the described protein's
denaturing temperature. In addition, proteins of the invention can be used
in a cleaning composition without detergents, again either alone or in
combination with builders and stabilizers.
The variant proteins of the present invention can be included in animal feed
such as part of animal feed additives as described in, for example, U.S.
Pat. No. 5,612,055; U.S. Pat. No. 5,314,692; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,642.
One aspect of the invention is a composition for the treatment of a textile
that includes variant proteins of the present invention. The composition can
be used to treat for example silk or wool as described in publications such
as RD 216,034; EP 134,267; U.S. Pat. No. 4,533,359; and EP 344,259.
The variants can be screened for proteolytic activity according to methods
well known in the art. Preferred protease variants include multiple
substitutions at positions corresponding to:
N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S173D;
V68A/N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S173D/Q236H;
V68A/N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S 173D/Q236H/Q245R;
V68A/N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S173D/A232V/Q236H/Q245R; and
V68A/N76D/S103A/V104I/G159D/K170D/Y171Q/S173D/T213R/A232V/Q236H/Q245R/T260
A of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin.
The proteins of this invention exhibit modified immunogenicity when compared
to their precursor proteins. In preferred embodiments, the proteins exhibit
reduced allergenicity. In other embodiments, the proteins exhibit increased
immunogenicity. The increase in immunogenicity is manifested by an increase
in B-cell or humoral immunological response, by an increase in T-cell or
cellular immunological response, or by an increase in both B and T cell
immunological responses. One of skill will readily recognize that the uses
of the proteins of this invention will be determined, in large part, on the
immunological properties of the proteins. For example, enzymes that exhibit
reduced allergenicity can be used in cleaning compositions. "Cleaning
compositions" are compositions that can be used to remove undesired
compounds from substrates, such as fabric, dishes, contact lenses, other
solid substrates, hair (shampoos), skin (soaps and creams), etc.
Proteins, in particular, cellulases, proteases, and amylases, with reduced
allergenicity can also be used in the treatment of textiles. "Textile
treatment" comprises a process wherein textiles, individual yarns or fibers
that can be woven, felted or knitted into textiles or garments are treated
to effect a desired characteristic. Examples of such desired characteristics
are "stone-washing", depilling, dehairing, desizing, softening, and other
textile treatments well known to those of skill in the art.
Therapeutic proteins against which individuals mount an immune response are
also included in the invention. In particular, individuals who lack
endogenous production of the protein are susceptible to forming neutralizing
antibodies and become refractile to treatment. Likewise, modifications of a
protein may introduce new epitopes that are potentially immunogeneic.
Methods of the invention can be used to identify and modify epitopes in,
e.g., human Factor VIII, to prevent neutralizing responses.
The pharmaceutical compositions can be prepared in various forms, such as
granules, tablets, pills, suppositories, capsules, suspensions, salves,
lotions and the like. Pharmaceutical grade organic or inorganic carriers
and/or diluents suitable for oral and topical use can be used to make up
compositions containing the therapeutically_active compounds. Diluents known
to the art include aqueous media, vegetable and animal oils and fats.
Stabilizing agents, wetting and emulsifying agents, salts for varying the
osmotic pressure or buffers for securing an adequate pH value, and skin
penetration enhancers can be used as auxiliary agents. The pharmaceutical
compositions may also include one or more of the following: carrier proteins
such as serum albumin; buffers; fillers such as microcrystalline cellulose,
lactose, corn and other starches; binding agents; sweeteners and other
flavoring agents; coloring agents; and polyethylene glycol. Additives are
well known in the art, and are used in a variety of formulations.
Claim 1 of 5 Claims
1. A variant of a polypeptide of interest comprising a T-cell epitope,
wherein said variant differs from said polypeptide of interest by having
an altered T-cell epitope such that said variant of said polypeptide
produces a reduced immunogenic response in an individual than said
polypeptide of interest, wherein said T-cell epitope is altered by having
a terminal portion of said polypeptide of interest comprising said T-cell
epitope replaced with a corresponding terminal portion of a homolog of
said polypeptide of interest wherein said homolog does not comprise a
T-cell epitope identical to said replaced epitope, and wherein said
polypeptide of interest is an enzyme.
____________________________________________
If you want to learn more
about this patent, please go directly to the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office Web site to access the full
patent.
|