|
|
Title: Avian hepatitis E virus,
vaccines and methods of protecting against avian hepatitis-splenomegaly
syndrome and mammalian hepatitis
United States Patent: 7,005,130
Issued: February 28, 2006
Inventors: Meng; Xiang-Jin (Blacksburg,
VA); Haqshenas; Gholamreza (Tehran, IR); Huang; Fang-Fang (Blacksburg, VA)
Assignee: Virginia Tech Intellectual
Properties, Inc. (Blacksburg, VA)
Appl. No.: 029840
Filed: December 31, 2001
|
|
|
Web Seminars -- Pharm/Biotech/etc.
|
Abstract
The present invention relates to a novel
isolated avian hepatitis E virus having a nucleotide sequence set forth in
SEQ ID NO:1 or its complementary strand. The invention further concerns
immunogenic compositions comprising this new virus or recombinant products
such as the nucleic acid and vaccines that protect an avian or mammalian
species from viral infection or hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome caused by
the hepatitis E virus. Also included in the scope of the invention is a
method for propagating, inactivating or attenuating a hepatitis E virus
comprising inoculating an embryonated chicken egg with a live, pathogenic
hepatitis E virus and recovering the virus or serially passing the
pathogenic virus through additional embryonated chicken eggs until the
virus is rendered inactivated or attenuated. Further, this invention
concerns diagnostic reagents for detecting an avian hepatitis E viral
infection or diagnosing hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome in an avian or
mammalian species comprising an antibody raised or produced against the
immunogenic compositions and antigens such as ORF2 proteins expressed in a
baculovirus vector, E. coli, etc. The invention additionally
encompasses methods for detecting avian HEV nucleic acid sequences using
nucleic acid hybridization probes or oligonucleotide primers for
polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention,
there is provided a novel avian hepatitis E virus (hereinafter referred to
as "avian HEV"). The new animal strain of HEV, avian HEV, has been
identified and genetically characterized from chickens with HS syndrome in
the United States. Like swine HEV, the avian HEV identified in this
invention is genetically related to human HEV strains. Unlike swine HEV
that causes only subclinical infection and mild microscopic liver lesions
in pigs, avian HEV is associated with a disease (HS syndrome) in chickens.
Advantageously, therefore, avian HEV infection in chickens provides a
superior, viable animal model to study human HEV replication and
pathogenesis.
Electron microscopy examination of bile samples of chickens with HS
syndrome revealed virus-like particles. The virus was biologically
amplified in embryonated chicken eggs, and a novel virus genetically
related to human HEV was identified from bile samples. The 3′ half of the
viral genome of approximately 4 kb was amplified by reverse-transcription
polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and sequenced. Sequence analyses of
this genomic region revealed that it contains the complete 3′ noncoding
region, the complete ORFs 2 and 3 genes, the complete RNA-dependent RNA
polymerase (RdRp) gene and a partial helicase gene of the ORF1. The
helicase gene is most conserved between avian HEV and other HEV strains,
displaying 58 to 60% amino acid sequence identities.
By comparing the ORF2 sequence of avian HEV with that of known HEV
strains, a major deletion of 54 amino acid residues between the putative
signal peptide sequence and the conserved tetrapeptide APLT of ORF2 was
identified in the avian HEV. As described herein, phylogenetic analysis
indicated that avian HEV is related to known HEV strains such as the
well-characterized human and swine HEV. Conserved regions of amino acid
sequences exist among the ORF2 capsid proteins of avian HEV, swine HEV and
human HEV. The close genetic-relatedness of avian HEV with human and swine
strains of HEV suggests avian, swine and human HEV all belong to the same
virus family. The avian HEV of the present invention is the most divergent
strain of HEV identified thus far. This discovery has important
implications for HEV animal model, nomenclature and epidemiology, and for
vaccine development against chicken HS, swine hepatitis E and human
hepatitis E.
Schlauder et al. recently reported that at least 8 different genotypes of
HEV exist worldwide (G. G. Schlauder et al., "Identification of 2 novel
isolates of hepatitis E virus in Argentina," J. Infect. Dis. 182:294-297
(2000)). They found that the European strains (Greek 1, Greek 2, and
Italy) and two Argentine isolates represent distinct genotypes. However,
it is now found that the European strains (Greek 1, Greek 2 and Italy)
appear to be more related to HEV genotype 3 which consists of swine and
human HEV strains from the U.S. and a swine HEV strain from New Zealand.
The phylogenetic tree was based on only 148 bp sequence that is available
for these strains. Additional sequence information from these strains of
human HEV is required for a definitive phylogenetic analysis. HEV was
classified in the family Caliciviridae (R. H. Purcell, "Hepatitis E
virus," FIELDS VIROLOGY, Vol. 2, pp. 2831-2843, B. N. Fields et al. eds,
Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia (3d ed. 1996)). The lack of
common features between HEV and caliciviruses has led to the recent
removal of HEV from the Caliciviridae family, and HEV remains
unclassified.
Avian HEV represents a new genotype 5. Sequence analyses revealed that the
new avian HEV is genetically related to swine and human HEV, displaying
47% to 50% amino acid sequence identity in the RdRp gene, 58% to 60%
identity in the helicase gene, and 42% to 44% identity in the putative
capsid gene (ORF2) with the corresponding regions of known HEV strains.
The genomic organization of avian HEV is very similar to that of human HEV:
non-structural genes such as RdRp and helicase are located at the 5′ end
and structural genes (ORF2 and ORF3) are located at the 3′ end of the
genome. The putative capsid gene (ORF2) of avian HEV is relatively
conserved at its N-terminal region (excluding the signal peptide) but is
less conserved at its C-terminal region. The ORF3 gene of avian HEV is
very divergent compared to that of known HEV strains. However, the
C-terminus of the ORF3 of avian HEV is relatively conserved, and this
region is believed to be the immuno-dominant portion of the ORF3 protein
(M. Zafrullah et al., "Mutational analysis of glycosylation, membrane
translocation, and cell surface expression of the hepatitis E virus ORF2
protein," J. Virol. 73:4074-4082 (1999)). Unlike most known HEV strains,
the ORF3 of avian HEV does not overlap with the ORF1. The ORF3 start codon
of avian HEV is located 41 nucleotides downstream that of known HEV
strains. Similar to avian HEV, the ORF3 of a strain of human HEV (HEV-T1
strain) recently identified from a patient in China does not overlap with
ORF1, and its ORF3 start codon is located 28 nucleotides downstream the
ORF1 stop codon (Y. Wang et al., "The complete sequence of hepatitis E
virus genotype 4 reveals an alternative strategy for translation of open
reading frames 2 and 3," J. Gen. Virol. 81:1675-1686 (2000)).
A major deletion was identified in the ORFs 2 and 3 overlapping region of
the avian HEV genome, located between the ORF2 signal peptide and the
conserved tetrapeptide APLT. It has been shown that, for certain HEV
strains, this genomic region is difficult to amplify by conventional PCR
methods (S. Yin et al., "A new Chinese isolate of hepatitis E virus:
comparison with strains recovered from different geographical regions,"
Virus Genes 9:23-32 (1994)), and that an addition of 5% v/v of formamide
or DMSO in the PCR reaction results in the successful amplification of
this genomic region. The region flanking the deletion in avian HEV genome
is relatively easy to amplify by a conventional PCR modified by the method
of the present invention. To rule out potential RT-PCR artifacts, the
region flanking the deletion was amplified with a set of avian HEV-specific
primers flanking the deletion. RT-PCR was performed with various different
parameters and conditions including cDNA synthesis at 60° C., PCR
amplification with higher denaturation temperature and shorter annealing
time, and PCR with the addition of 5% v/v of formamide or DMSO. No
additional sequence was identified, and the deletion was further verified
by direct sequencing of the amplified PCR product flanking the deletion
region. It is thus concluded that the observed deletion in avian HEV
genome is not due to RT-PCR artifacts.
Ray et al. also reported a major deletion in the ORF2/ORF3 overlapping
region of an Indian strain of human HEV (R. Ray et al., "Indian hepatitis
E virus shows a major deletion in the small open reading frame," Virology
189:359-362 (1992)). Unlike the avian HEV deletion, the deletion in the
Indian strain of human HEV eliminated the ORF2 signal peptide sequence
that overlaps with the ORF3. The sequence of other genomic regions of this
Indian HEV strain is not available for further analysis. The biological
significance of this deletion is not known. It has been shown that, when
the ORF2 of a human HEV is expressed in the baculovirus system, a
truncated version of ORF2 protein lacking the N-terminal 111 amino acid
residues is produced. The truncated ORF2 protein was cleaved at amino acid
position 111-112 (Y. Zhang et al., "Expression, characterization, and
immunoreactivities of a soluble hepatitis E virus putative capsid protein
species expressed in insect cells," Clin. Diag. Lab. Immunol. 4:423-428
(1997)), but was still able to form virus-like particles (T. C. Li et al.,
"Expression and self-assembly of empty virus-like particles of hepatitis E
virus," J. Virol. 71:7207-7213 (1997)). Avian HEV lacks most of the
N-terminal 100 amino acid residues of the ORF2, however, the conserved
tetrapeptide APLT (pos. 108-111 in ORF2) and a distinct but typical signal
peptide sequence are present in the ORF2 of avian HEV. Taken together,
these data suggest that the genomic region between the cleavage site of
the ORF2 signal peptide and the conserved tetrapeptide APLT is
dispensable, and is not required for virus replication or maturation.
It has been shown that the ORF2 protein of human HEV pORF2 is the main
immunogenic protein that is able to induce immune response against HEV.
Recently, the C-terminal 267 amino acids of truncated ORF2 of a human HEV
was expressed in a bacterial expression system showing that the sequences
spanning amino acids 394 to 457 of the ORF2 capsid protein participated in
the formation of strongly immunodominant epitopes on the surface of HEV
particles (M. A. Riddell et al., "Identification of immunodominant and
conformational epitopes in the capsid protein of hepatitis E virus by
using monoclonal antibodies," J. Virology 74:8011-17 (2000)). It was
reported that this truncated protein was used in an ELISA to detect HEV
infection in humans (D. A. Anderson et al., "ELISA for IgG-class antibody
to hepatitis E virus based on a highly conserved, conformational epitope
expressed in Escherichia coli," J. Virol. Methods 81:131-42
(1999)). It has also been shown that C-terminus of the protein is masked
when expression of the entire pORF2 is carried out in a bacterial
expression system, and that the 112 amino acids located at N-terminus of
ORF2 and the 50 amino acids located at the C-terminus are not involved in
the formation of virus-like particles (T. C. Li et al., 1997, supra). The
expression and characterization of the C-terminal 268 amino acid residues
of avian HEV ORF2 in the context of the present invention corresponds to
the C-terminal 267 amino acid residues of human HEV.
The present invention demonstrates that avian HEV is antigenically related
to human and swine HEVs as well as chicken BLSV. The antigenic relatedness
of avian HEV ORF2 capsid protein with human HEV, swine HEV and chicken
BLSV establishes that immunization with an avian HEV vaccine (either an
attenuated or a recombinant vaccine) will protect not only against avian
HEV infection, HS syndrome and BLSV infection in chickens but also against
human and swine HEV infections in humans and swine. Thus, a vaccine based
on avian HEV, its nucleic acid and the proteins encoded by the nucleic
acid will possess beneficial, broad spectrum, immunogenic activity against
avian, swine and human HEVs, and BLSV.
Western blot analyses revealed that antiserum to each virus strongly
reacted with homologous antigen. It was also demonstrated that the
antiserum against BLSV reacted with the recombinant ORF2 protein of avian
HEV, indicating that BLSV is antigenically related to avian HEV. The
reaction between Sar-55 human HEV and swine HEV antigens with convalescent
antiserum against avian HEV generated strong signals while the
cross-reactivity of antisera with heterologous antigens was relatively
weak. In ELISA, the optical densities ("ODs") obtained from the reaction
of avian HEV antigen with Sar-55 HEV and swine HEV antisera were lower
than the ODs obtained from the reaction of avian HEV antiserum with the
HPLC-purified Sar-55 HEV and swine HEV antigens. This result may have
occurred because the Sar-55 HEV and swine HEV antigens of the examples
were the complete ORF2 proteins instead of the truncated avian ORF2
protein lacking the N-terminal amino acid residues.
Schofield et al. generated neutralizing MAbs against the capsid protein of
a human HEV (D. J. Schofield et al., "Identification by phage display and
characterization of two neutralizing chimpanzee monoclonal antibodies to
the hepatitis E virus capsid protein," J. Virol. 74:5548-55 (2000)). The
neutralizing MAbs recognized the linear epitope(s) located between amino
acids 578 and 607. The region in avian HEV corresponding to this
neutralizing epitope is located within the truncated ORF2 of avian HEV
that reacted with human HEV and swine HEV anti-sera.
So far, HS syndrome has only been reported in several Provinces of Canada
and a few States in the U.S. In Australia, chicken farms have been
experiencing outbreaks of big liver and spleen disease (BLS) for many
years. BLS was recognized in Australia in 1988 (J. H. Handlinger et al.,
"An egg drop associated with splenomegaly in broiler breeders," Avian Dis.
32:773-778 (1988)), however, there has been no report regarding a possible
link between HS in North America and BLS in Australia. A virus (designated
BLSV) was isolated from chickens with BLS in Australia. BLSV was shown to
be genetically related to HEV based on a short stretch of sequence
available (C. J. Payne et al., "Sequence data suggests big liver and
spleen disease virus (BLSV) is genetically related to hepatitis E virus,"
Vet. Microbiol. 68:119-25 (1999)). The avian HEV identified in this
invention is closely related to BLSV identified from chickens in
Australia, displaying about 80% nucleotide sequence identity in this short
genomic region (439 bp). It appears that a similar virus related to HEV
may have caused the HS syndrome in North American chickens and BLS in
Australian chickens, but the avian HEV nevertheless remains a unique
strain or isolate, a totally distinct entity from the BLS virus. Further
genetic characterization of avian HEV shows that it has about 60%
nucleotide sequence identities with human and swine HEVs.
In the past, the pathogenesis and replication of HEV have been poorly
understood due to the absence of an efficient in vitro cell culture system
for HEV. In this invention, it is now demonstrated that embryonated SPF
chicken eggs can unexpectedly be infected with avian HEV through
intravenous route (I.V.) of inoculation. Earlier studies showed that bile
samples positive by EM for virus particles failed to infect embryonated
chicken eggs (J. S. Jeffrey et al., 1998, supra; H. L. Shivaprasad et al.,
1995, supra). The I.V. route of inoculation has been almost exclusively
used in studies with human and swine HEV. Other inoculation routes such as
the oral route have failed to infect pigs with swine HEV, even when a
relatively high infectious dose (104.5 50% pig infectious dose)
of swine HEV was used. Based on the surprising success of the present egg
inoculation experiments, it illustrates that embryonated eggs are
susceptible to infection with human and avian strains of HEV making
embryonated eggs a useful in vitro method to study HEV replication and a
useful tool to manufacture vaccines that benefit public health.
The identification of avian HEV from chickens with HS in the context of
this invention further strengthens the hypothesis that hepatitis E is a
zoonosis. The genetic close-relatedness of avian HEV to human and swine
HEV strains raises a potential public health concern for zoonosis. Recent
studies showed that pig handlers are at increased risk of zoonotic HEV
infection (X. J. Meng et al., 1999, supra). Karetnyi et al. reported that
human populations with occupational exposure to wild animals have
increased risks of HEV infection (Y. V. Karetnyi et al., "Hepatitis E
virus infection prevalence among selected populations in Iowa," J. Clin.
Virol. 14:51-55 (1999)). Since individuals such as poultry farmers or
avian veterinarians may be at potential risk of zoonotic infection by
avian HEV, the present invention finds broad application to prevent viral
infections in humans as well as chickens and other carrier animals.
The present invention provides an isolated avian hepatitis E virus that is
associated with serious viral infections and hepatitis-splenomegaly
syndrome in chickens. This invention includes, but is not limited to, the
virus which has a nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1, its
functional equivalent or complementary strand. It will be understood that
the specific nucleotide sequence derived from any avian HEV will have
slight variations that exist naturally between individual viruses. These
variations in sequences may be seen in deletions, substitutions,
insertions and the like. Thus, to distinguish the virus embraced by this
invention from the Australian big liver and spleen disease virus, the
avian HEV virus is characterized by having no more than about 80%
nucleotide sequence homology to the BLSV.
The source of the isolated virus strain is bile, feces, serum, plasma or
liver cells from chickens or human carriers suspected to have the avian
hepatitis E viral infection. However, it is contemplated that recombinant
DNA technology can be used to duplicate and chemically synthesize the
nucleotide sequence. Therefore, the scope of the present invention
encompasses the isolated polynucleotide which comprises, but is not
limited to, a nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 or its
complementary strand; a polynucleotide which hybridizes to and which is at
least 95% complementary to the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID
NO:1; or an immunogenic fragment selected from the group consisting of a
nucleotide sequence in the partial helicase gene of ORF1 set forth in SEQ
ID NO:3, a nucleotide sequence in the RdRp gene set forth in SEQ ID NO:5,
a nucleotide sequence in the ORF2 gene set forth in SEQ ID NO:7, a
nucleotide sequence in the ORF3 gene set forth in SEQ ID NO:9 or their
complementary strands. The immunogenic or antigenic coding regions or
fragments can be determined by techniques known in the art and then used
to make monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies for immunoreactivity screening
or other diagnostic purposes. The invention further encompasses the
purified, immunogenic protein encoded by the isolated polynucleotides.
Desirably, the protein may be an isolated or recombinant ORF2 capsid
protein or an ORF3 protein.
Another important aspect of the present invention is the unique
immunogenic composition comprising the isolated avian HEV or an antigenic
protein encoded by an isolated polynucleotide described hereinabove and
its use for raising or producing antibodies. The composition contains a
nontoxic, physiologically acceptable carrier and, optionally, one or more
adjuvants. Suitable carriers, such as, for example, water, saline,
ethanol, ethylene glycol, glycerol, etc., are easily selected from
conventional excipients and co-formulants may be added. Routine tests can
be performed to ensure physical compatibility and stability of the final
composition.
Vaccines and methods of using them are also included within the scope of
the present invention. Inoculated avian or mammalian species are protected
from serious viral infection, hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome, hepatitis E
and other related illness. The vaccines comprise, for example, an
inactivated or attenuated avian hepatitis E virus, a nontoxic,
physiologically acceptable carrier and, optionally, one or more adjuvants.
The adjuvant, which may be administered in conjunction with the
immunogenic composition or vaccine of the present invention, is a
substance that increases the immunological response when combined with the
composition or vaccine. The adjuvant may be administered at the same time
and at the same site as the composition or vaccine, or at a different
time, for example, as a booster. Adjuvants also may advantageously be
administered to the mammal in a manner or at a site different from the
manner or site in which the composition or vaccine is administered.
Suitable adjuvants include, but are not limited to, aluminum hydroxide
(alum), immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMS), non-ionic block polymers or
copolymers, cytokines (like IL-1, IL-2, IL-7, IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, etc.),
saponins, monophosphoryl lipid A (MLA), muramyl dipeptides (MDP) and the
like. Other suitable adjuvants include, for example, aluminum potassium
sulfate, heat-labile or heat-stable enterotoxin isolated from
Escherichia coli, cholera toxin or the B subunit thereof, diphtheria
toxin, tetanus toxin, pertussis toxin, Freund's incomplete or complete
adjuvant, etc. Toxin-based adjuvants, such as diphtheria toxin, tetanus
toxin and pertussis toxin may be inactivated prior to use, for example, by
treatment with formaldehyde.
The new vaccines of this invention are not restricted to any particular
type or method of preparation. The vaccines include, but are not limited
to, modified live vaccines, inactivated vaccines, subunit vaccines,
attenuated vaccines, genetically engineered vaccines, etc. These vaccines
are prepared by general methods known in the art modified by the new use
of embryonated eggs. For instance, a modified live vaccine may be prepared
by optimizing avian HEV propagation in embryonated eggs as described
herein and further virus production by methods known in the art. Since
avian HEV cannot grow in the standard cell culture, the avian HEV of the
present invention can uniquely be attenuated by serial passage in
embryonated chicken eggs. The virus propagated in eggs may be lyophilized
(freeze-dried) by methods known in the art to enhance preservability for
storage. After subsequent rehydration, the material is then used as a live
vaccine.
The advantages of live vaccines is that all possible immune responses are
activated in the recipient of the vaccine, including systemic, local,
humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. The disadvantages of live
virus vaccines, which may outweigh the advantages, lie in the potential
for contamination with live adventitious viral agents or the risk that the
virus may revert to virulence in the field.
To prepare inactivated virus vaccines, for instance, the virus propagation
and virus production in embryonated eggs are again first optimized by
methods described herein. Serial virus inactivation is then optimized by
protocols generally known to those of ordinary skill in the art or,
preferably, by the methods described herein.
Inactivated virus vaccines may be prepared by treating the avian HEV with
inactivating agents such as formalin or hydrophobic solvents, acids, etc.,
by irradiation with ultraviolet light or X-rays, by heating, etc.
Inactivation is conducted in a manner understood in the art. For example,
in chemical inactivation, a suitable virus sample or serum sample
containing the virus is treated for a sufficient length of time with a
sufficient amount or concentration of inactivating agent at a sufficiently
high (or low, depending on the inactivating agent) temperature or pH to
inactivate the virus. Inactivation by heating is conducted at a
temperature and for a length of time sufficient to inactivate the virus.
Inactivation by irradiation is conducted using a wavelength of light or
other energy source for a length of time sufficient to inactivate the
virus. The virus is considered inactivated if it is unable to infect a
cell susceptible to infection.
The preparation of subunit vaccines typically differs from the preparation
of a modified live vaccine or an inactivated vaccine. Prior to preparation
of a subunit vaccine, the protective or antigenic components of the
vaccine must be identified. Such protective or antigenic components
include certain amino acid segments or fragments of the viral capsid
proteins which raise a particularly strong protective or immunological
response in chickens; single or multiple viral capsid proteins themselves,
oligomers thereof, and higher-order associations of the viral capsid
proteins which form virus substructures or identifiable parts or units of
such substructures; oligoglycosides, glycolipids or glycoproteins present
on or near the surface of the virus or in viral substructures such as the
lipoproteins or lipid groups associated with the virus, etc. Preferably,
the capsid protein (ORF2) is employed as the antigenic component of the
subunit vaccine. Other proteins may also be used such as those encoded by
the nucleotide sequence in the ORF3 gene. These immunogenic components are
readily identified by methods known in the art. Once identified, the
protective or antigenic portions of the virus (i.e., the "subunit") are
subsequently purified and/or cloned by procedures known in the art. The
subunit vaccine provides an advantage over other vaccines based on the
live virus since the subunit, such as highly purified subunits of the
virus, is less toxic than the whole virus.
If the subunit vaccine is produced through recombinant genetic techniques,
expression of the cloned subunit such as the ORF2 (capsid) and ORF3 genes,
for example, may be optimized by methods known to those in the art (see,
for example, Maniatis et al., "Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual,"
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, Mass. (1989)). On the
other hand, if the subunit being employed represents an intact structural
feature of the virus, such as an entire capsid protein, the procedure for
its isolation from the virus must then be optimized. In either case, after
optimization of the inactivation protocol, the subunit purification
protocol may be optimized prior to manufacture.
To prepare attenuated vaccines, the live, pathogenic virus is first
attenuated (rendered nonpathogenic or harmless) by methods known in the
art or, preferably, as described herein. For instance, attenuated viruses
may be prepared by the technique of the present invention which involves
the novel serial passage through embryonated chicken eggs. Attenuated
viruses can be found in nature and may have naturally-occurring gene
deletions or, alternatively, the pathogenic viruses can be attenuated by
making gene deletions or producing gene mutations. The attenuated and
inactivated virus vaccines comprise the preferred vaccines of the present
invention.
Genetically engineered vaccines, which are also desirable in the present
invention, are produced by techniques known in the art. Such techniques
involve, but are not limited to, the use of RNA, recombinant DNA,
recombinant proteins, live viruses and the like.
For instance, after purification, the wild-type virus may be isolated from
suitable clinical, biological samples such as feces or bile by methods
known in the art, preferably by the method taught herein using embryonated
chicken eggs as hosts. The RNA is extracted from the biologically pure
virus or infectious agent by methods known in the art, preferably by the
guanidine isothiocyanate method using a commercially available RNA
isolation kit (for example, the kit available from Statagene, La Jolla,
Calif.) and purified by methods known in the art, preferably by
ultracentrifugation in a CsCl gradient. RNA may be further purified or
enriched by oligo(dT)-cellulose column chromatography. The cDNA of viral
genome is cloned into a suitable host by methods known in the art (see
Maniatis et al., id.), and the virus genome is then analyzed to determine
essential regions of the genome for producing antigenic portions of the
virus. Thereafter, the procedure is generally the same as that for the
modified live vaccine, an inactivated vaccine or a subunit vaccine.
Genetically engineered vaccines based on recombinant DNA technology are
made, for instance, by identifying the portion of the viral gene which
encodes for proteins responsible for inducing a stronger immune or
protective response in chickens (e.g., proteins derived from ORF1, ORF2,
ORF3, etc.). Such identified genes or immunodominant fragments can be
cloned into standard protein expression vectors, such as the baculovirus
vector, and used to infect appropriate host cells (see, for example,
O'Reilly et al., "Baculovirus Expression Vectors: A Lab Manual," Freeman &
Co. (1992)). The host cells are cultured, thus expressing the desired
vaccine proteins, which can be purified to the desired extent and
formulated into a suitable vaccine product.
Genetically engineered proteins, useful in vaccines, for instance, may be
expressed in insect cells, yeast cells or mammalian cells. The genetically
engineered proteins, which may be purified or isolated by conventional
methods, can be directly inoculated into an avian or mammalian species to
confer protection against avian or human hepatitis E.
An insect cell line (like HI-FIVE) can be transformed with a transfer
vector containing polynucleic acids obtained from the virus or copied from
the viral genome which encodes one or more of the immuno-dominant proteins
of the virus. The transfer vector includes, for example, linearized
baculovirus DNA and a plasmid containing the desired polynucleotides. The
host cell line may be co-transfected with the linearized baculovirus DNA
and a plasmid in order to make a recombinant baculovirus.
Alternatively, RNA or DNA from the HS infected carrier or the isolated
avian HEV which encode one or more capsid proteins can be inserted into
live vectors, such as a poxvirus or an adenovirus and used as a vaccine.
An immunologically effective amount of the vaccine of the present
invention is administered to an avian or mammalian species in need of
protection against said infection or syndrome. The "immunologically
effective amount" can be easily determined or readily titrated by routine
testing. An effective amount is one in which a sufficient immunological
response to the vaccine is attained to protect the bird or mammal exposed
to the virus which causes chicken HS, human hepatitis E, swine hepatitis E
or related illness. Preferably, the avian or mammalian species is
protected to an extent in which one to all of the adverse physiological
symptoms or effects of the viral disease are found to be significantly
reduced, ameliorated or totally prevented.
The vaccine can be administered in a single dose or in repeated doses.
Dosages may contain, for example, from 1 to 1,000 micrograms of
virus-based antigen (dependent upon the concentration of the immuno-active
component of the vaccine), but should not contain an amount of virus-based
antigen sufficient to result in an adverse reaction or physiological
symptoms of viral infection. Methods are known in the art for determining
or titrating suitable dosages of active antigenic agent based on the
weight of the bird or mammal, concentration of the antigen and other
typical factors.
The vaccine can be administered to chickens, turkeys or other farm animals
in close contact with chickens, for example, pigs. Also, the vaccine can
be given to humans such as chicken or poultry farmers who are at high risk
of being infected by the viral agent. It is contemplated that a vaccine
based on the avian HEV can be designed to provide broad protection against
both avian and human hepatitis E. In other words, the vaccine based on the
avian HEV can be preferentially designed to protect against human
hepatitis E through the so-called "Jennerian approach" (i.e., cowpox virus
vaccine can be used against human smallpox by Edward Jenner). Desirably,
the vaccine is administered directly to an avian or mammalian species not
yet exposed to the virus which causes HS, hepatitis E or related illness.
The vaccine can conveniently be administered orally, intrabuccally,
intranasally, transdermally, parenterally, etc. The parenteral route of
administration includes, but is not limited to, intramuscular,
intravenous, intraperitoneal and subcutaneous routes.
When administered as a liquid, the present vaccine may be prepared in the
form of an aqueous solution, a syrup, an elixir, a tincture and the like.
Such formulations are known in the art and are typically prepared by
dissolution of the antigen and other typical additives in the appropriate
carrier or solvent systems. Suitable carriers or solvents include, but are
not limited to, water, saline, ethanol, ethylene glycol, glycerol, etc.
Typical additives are, for example, certified dyes, flavors, sweeteners
and antimicrobial preservatives such as thimerosal (sodium
ethylmercurithiosalicylate). Such solutions may be stabilized, for
example, by addition of partially hydrolyzed gelatin, sorbitol or cell
culture medium, and may be buffered by conventional methods using reagents
known in the art, such as sodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen
phosphate, potassium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, a
mixture thereof, and the like.
Liquid formulations also may include suspensions and emulsions which
contain suspending or emulsifying agents in combination with other
standard co-formulants. These types of liquid formulations may be prepared
by conventional methods. Suspensions, for example, may be prepared using a
colloid mill. Emulsions, for example, may be prepared using a homogenizer.
Parenteral formulations, designed for injection into body fluid systems,
require proper isotonicity and pH buffering to the corresponding levels of
mammalian body fluids. Isotonicity can be appropriately adjusted with
sodium chloride and other salts as needed. Suitable solvents, such as
ethanol or propylene glycol, can be used to increase the solubility of the
ingredients in the formulation and the stability of the liquid
preparation. Further additives which can be employed in the present
vaccine include, but are not limited to, dextrose, conventional
antioxidants and conventional chelating agents such as ethylenediamine
tetraacetic acid (EDTA). Parenteral dosage forms must also be sterilized
prior to use.
Also included within the scope of the present invention is a novel method
for propagating, inactivating or attenuating the pathogenic hepatitis E
virus (avian, swine, human, etc.) which comprises inoculating an
embryonated chicken egg with a live, pathogenic hepatitis E virus
contained in a biological sample from bile, feces, serum, plasma, liver
cell, etc., preferably by intravenous injection, and either recovering a
live, pathogenic virus for further research and vaccine development or
continuing to pass the pathogenic virus serially through additional
embryonated chicken eggs until the pathogenic virus is rendered
inactivated or attenuated. Propagating live viruses through embryonated
chicken eggs according to the present invention is a unique method which
others have failed to attain. Vaccines are typically made by serial
passage through cell cultures but avian HEV, for example, cannot be
propagated in conventional cell cultures. Using embryonated chicken eggs
provides a novel, viable means for inactivating or attenuating the
pathogenic virus in order to be able to make a vaccine product. The
inactivated or attenuated strain, which was previously unobtainable, can
now be incorporated into conventional vehicles for delivering vaccines.
Additionally, the present invention provides a useful diagnostic reagent
for detecting the avian or mammalian HEV infection or diagnosing
hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome in an avian or mammalian species which
comprise a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody purified from a natural host
such as, for example, by inoculating a chicken with the avian HEV or the
immunogenic composition of the invention in an effective immunogenic
quantity to produce a viral infection and recovering the antibody from the
serum of the infected chicken. Alternatively, the antibodies can be raised
in experimental animals against the natural or synthetic polypeptides
derived or expressed from the amino acid sequences or immunogenic
fragments encoded by the nucleotide sequence of the isolated avian HEV.
For example, monoclonal antibodies can be produced from hybridoma cells
which are obtained from mice such as, for example, Balb/c, immunized with
a polypeptide antigen derived from the nucleotide sequence of the isolated
avian HEV. Selection of the hybridoma cells is made by growth in
hyproxanthine, thymidine and aminopterin in a standard cell culture medium
like Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) or minimal essential
medium. The hybridoma cells which produce antibodies can be cloned
according to procedures known in the art. Then, the discrete colonies
which are formed can be transferred into separate wells of culture plates
for cultivation in a suitable culture medium. Identification of antibody
secreting cells is done by conventional screening methods with the
appropriate antigen or immunogen. Cultivating the hybridoma cells in vitro
or in vivo by obtaining ascites fluid in mice after injecting the
hybridoma produces the desired monoclonal antibody via well-known
techniques.
For another alternative method, avian HEV capsid protein can be expressed
in a baculovirus expression system or E coli according to
procedures known in the art. The expressed recombinant avian HEV capsid
protein can be used as the antigen for diagnosis of HS or human hepatitis
E in an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent Assay (ELISA). The ELISA assay based
on the avian recombinant capsid antigen, for example, can be used to
detect antibodies to avian HEV in avian and mammalian species. Although
the ELISA assay is preferred, other known diagnostic tests can be employed
such as immunofluorescence assay (IFA), immunoperoxidase assay (IPA), etc.
Desirably, a commercial ELISA diagnostic assay in accordance with the
present invention can be used to diagnose avian HEV infection and HS
syndrome in chickens. The examples illustrate using purified ORF2 protein
of avian HEV to develop an ELISA assay to detect anti-HEV in chickens.
Weekly sera collected from SPF chickens experimentally infected with avian
HEV, and negative sera from control chickens are used to validate the
assay. This ELISA assay has been successfully used in the chicken studies
to monitor the course of seroconversion to anti-HEV in chickens
experimentally infected with avian HEV. Further standardization of the
test by techniques known to those skilled in the art may optimize the
commercialization of a diagnostic assay for avian HEV. Other diagnostic
assays can also be developed as a result of the findings of the present
invention such as a nucleic acid-based diagnostic assay, for example, an
RT-PCR assay and the like. Based on the description of the sequences of
the partial genomes of the nine new strains of avian HEV, the RT-PCR assay
and other nucleic acid-based assays can be standardized to detect avian
HEV in clinical samples.
The antigenic cross-reactivity of the truncated ORF2 capsid protein
(pORF2) of avian HEV with swine HEV, human HEV and the chicken big liver
and spleen disease virus (BLSV) is shown in the below examples. The
sequence of C-terminal 268 amino acid residuals of avian HEV ORF2 was
cloned into expression vector pRSET-C and expressed in Escherichia coil
(E. coli) strain BL21(DE3)pLysS. The truncated ORF2 protein was
expressed as a fusion protein and purified by affinity chromatography.
Western blot analysis revealed that the purified avian HEV ORF2 protein
reacted with the antisera raised against the capsid protein of Sar-55
human HEV and with convalescent antisera against swine HEV and US2 human
HEV as well as antiserum against BLSV. The antiserum against avian HEV
also reacted with the HPLC-purified recombinant capsid proteins of swine
HEV and Sar-55 human HEV. The antiserum against US2 strain of human HEV
also reacted with recombinant ORF2 proteins of both swine HEV and Sar-55
human HEV. Using ELISA further confirmed the cross reactivity of avian HEV
putative capsid protein with the corresponding genes of swine HEV and
human HEVs. The results show that avian HEV shares some antigenic epitopes
in its capsid protein with swine and human HEVs as well as BLSV, and
establish the usefulness of the diagnostic reagents for HEV diagnosis as
described herein.
The diagnostic reagent is employed in a method of the invention for
detecting the avian or mammalian hepatitis E viral infection or diagnosing
hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome in an avian or mammalian species which
comprises contacting a biological sample of the bird or mammal with the
aforesaid diagnostic reagent and detecting the presence of an
antigen-antibody complex by conventional means known to those of ordinary
skill in the art. The biological sample includes, but is not limited to,
blood, plasma, bile, feces, serum, liver cell, etc. To detect the
antigen-antibody complex, a form of labeling is often used. Suitable
radioactive or non-radioactive labeling substances include, but are not
limited to, radioactive isotopes, fluorescent compounds, dyes, etc. The
detection or diagnosis method of this invention includes immunoassays,
immunometric assays and the like. The method employing the diagnostic
reagent may also be accomplished in an in vitro assay in which the
antigen-antibody complex is detected by observing a resulting
precipitation. The biological sample can be utilized from any avian
species such as chickens, turkeys, etc. or mammals such as pigs and other
farm animals or humans, in particular, chicken farmers who have close
contact with chickens, If the bird or the mammal is suspected of harboring
a hepatitis E viral infection and exhibiting symptoms typical of
hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome or other related illness, the diagnostic
assay will be helpful to determine the appropriate course of treatment
once the viral causative agent has been identified.
Another preferred embodiment of the present invention involves methods for
detecting avian HEV nucleic acid sequences in an avian or mammalian
species using nucleic acid hybridization probes or oligonucleotide primers
for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to further aid in the diagnosis of
viral infection or disease. The diagnostic tests, which are useful in
detecting the presence or absence of the avian hepatitis E viral nucleic
acid sequence in the avian or mammalian species, comprise, but are not
limited to, isolating nucleic acid from the bird or mammal and then
hybridizing the isolated nucleic acid with a suitable nucleic acid probe
or probes, which can be radio-labeled, or a pair of oligonucleotide
primers derived from the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 and
determining the presence or absence of a hybridized probe complex.
Conventional nucleic acid hybridization assays can be employed by those of
ordinary skill in this art. For example, the sample nucleic acid can be
immobilized on paper, beads or plastic surfaces, with or without employing
capture probes; an excess amount of radio-labeled probes that are
complementary to the sequence of the sample nucleic acid is added; the
mixture is hybridized under suitable standard or stringent conditions; the
unhybridized probe or probes are removed; and then an analysis is made to
detect the presence of the hybridized probe complex, that is, the probes
which are bound to the immobilized sample. When the oligonucleotide
primers are used, the isolated nucleic acid may be further amplified in a
polymerase chain reaction or other comparable manner before analysis for
the presence or absence of the hybridized probe complex. Preferably, the
polymerase chain reaction is performed with the addition of 5% v/v of
formamide or dimethyl sulfoxide.
Claim 1 of 7 Claims
1. An isolated avian hepatitis
E virus having the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 or its
complementary strand.
____________________________________________
If you want to learn more
about this patent, please go directly to the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office Web site to access the full
patent.
|