Pharm/Biotech Resources

Outsourcing Guide

Cont. Education

Software/Reports

Training Courses

Web Seminars

Jobs

Buyer's Guide

Home Page

Pharm Patents /
Licensing

Pharm News

Federal Register

Pharm Stocks

FDA Links

FDA Warning Letters

FDA Doc/cGMP

Pharm/Biotech Events

Consultants

Advertiser Info

Newsletter Subscription

Web Links

Suggestions

Site Map
 

 
 

 

Released by FDA: 6/7/00.  Posted by FDA:  6/29/00

Stephen W. Sherman 
Director, Labeling and Advertising Regulatory Affairs 
ALZA Corporation 
1010 Joaquin Road 
Mountain View, CA 94039

RE:   NDA 50-718 
        Doxil® (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) 
        MACMIS ID# 9041

Dear Mr. Sherman:

As part of its routine monitoring and surveillance program, the Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications (DDMAC) has identified certain promotional activities by ALZA Corporation (ALZA) that are in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act).  Specifically, ALZA promoted its drug, Doxil, as safe or effective for an unapproved indication and made unsubstantiated comparative claims at its promotional exhibit booth at the 36th Annual American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting in New Orleans.

Doxil is indicated for the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the ovary in patients with disease that is refractory to both paclitaxel- and platinum-based chemotherapy regimens.  Doxil is under accelerated approval and has not yet demonstrated clinical benefit for this indication.  Hycamtin (topotecan HCl) is indicated for metastatic carcinoma of the ovary after failure of initial or subsequent chemotherapy (i.e., in platinum-sensitive patients).

At your exhibit booth on May 21, 2000, one of your representatives explained to visitors that Doxil has decreased toxicity, specifically, less myelosuppression, than Hycamtin.  Your representative further explained that Doxil “targets the tumor, not normal blood cells” and stated that Doxil has comparative efficacy to Hycamtin in ovarian cancer.  Such safety and efficacy claims are unsubstantiated and in violation of the Act. 

In order to address these objections, DDMAC recommends that ALZA take the following actions:

  1. This ALZA representative, and any other ALZA representative or agent, should immediately cease making such violative oral statements and should cease the distribution and use of any Doxil promotional materials that contain the same or similar violative statements.

  2. Provide to DDMAC, in writing, your intent to comply with #1 above.  Your response should be received by June 21, 2000.

  3. This response should describe your method of discontinuing such oral or written statements and should include a list of all similarly violative promotional materials that were discontinued.

If you have any questions, please contact me by facsimile at (301) 594-6771, or by written communication at the Food and Drug Administration; Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-42; Room 17B-20; 5600 Fishers Lane; Rockville, MD 20857.  We remind you that only written communications are considered official.

In all future correspondence regarding this matter, please refer to MACMIS (D# 9041 and NDA 50-718.

 

Sincerely,

Jean-Ah Choi, Pharm.D. 
Regulatory Review Officer 
Division of Drug Marketing, 
    Advertising, and Communications

 

 

[ Outsourcing Guide ] [ Cont. Education ] [ Software/Reports ] [ Training Courses ]
[ Web Seminars ] [ Jobs ] [ Consultants ] [ Buyer's Guide ] [ Advertiser Info ]

[ Home ] [ Pharm Patents / Licensing ] [ Pharm News ] [ Federal Register ]
[ Pharm Stocks ] [ FDA Links ] [ FDA Warning Letters ] [ FDA Doc/cGMP ]
[ Pharm/Biotech Events ] [ Newsletter Subscription ] [ Web Links ] [ Suggestions ]
[ Site Map ]