|
|
||
|
|
Released by FDA: 5/10/01. Posted by FDA: 5/22/01 Sam Boddapati, PhD. RE: IND# [Confidential, deleted by FDA] Dear Dr. Boddapati: Through routine monitoring and surveillance, the Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications (DDMAC) has become aware of promotional materials disseminated by Supergen, Inc. (Supergen) for the investigational drug rubitecan that misbrand rubitecan in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) and its implementing regulations. Specifically, Supergen is promoting the investigational drug, rubitecan, as safe or effective prior to approval on its website www.supergen.com (5/8101). A sponsor shall not represent, in a promotional context, that an investigational drug is safe or effective for the purpose under investigation. Supergen makes numerous claims regarding the safety and efficacy of rubitecan on its website. These claims are based solely upon preliminary and inconclusive data since the clinical investigations of rubitecan are in the initial stages of investigation. Therefore, the website is in violation of the Act and its implementing regulations because it promotes an investigational new drug as safe or effective for uses under investigation (e.g., prostate, breast, lung, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers). Following are selected statements from the website that promote rubitecan as safe or effective:
Furthermore, the presentation of rubitecan information on the “Products - Pipeline” webpage (www.supergen.com/product/2_2.htm) also promotes unapproved uses for rubitecan. The chart shows uses for rubitecan that are investigational but use the word indication” as a “header” to describe investigational uses. “Indication,” however, is a part of a specific heading (“Indication and Usage”) required in approved product labeling (PI). This specific heading in the PI presents the approved indications for the named drug (approved by the Food and Drug Administration after review and approval of the applicant’s New Drug Application). The use of “Indication” in the rubitecan pipeline chart is misleading because the listing of the terms “pancreatic,” “hematological,” “ovarian,” “colorectal “breast,” and “lung” under “Indication” suggests that these unapproved uses are, in fact, approved. Finally, the “Products-Focus on Oncology” (www.supergen.com/product/2_3.htm) webpage on Supergen’s website does not distinguish between approved and investigational drugs. This webpage presents investigational drugs and approved drugs on the same list. Presenting investigational drugs in this manner suggests that the investigational drugs are approved when such a determination has not been made. Supergen should immediately cease distribution and use of materials that promote rubitecan as safe or effective prior to approval. This includes removal of similar claims and presentations on Supergen’s website. Supergen should submit a written response to DDMAC on or before May 24, 2001, describing its intent and plans to comply with the above. In its letter to DDMAC, Supergen should include the date on which this and other similarly violative materials were discontinued. Supergen should direct its response to me by facsimile at (301) 594-6771 or by written communication at the Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-42, Rm. 17B-20, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. In all future correspondence regarding this matter, please refer to MACMIS ID # 9321 in addition to the 1ND number. DDMAC reminds Supergen that only written communications are considered official.
|
|
|