|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Link:
Pharm/Biotech Resources Released by FDA: 9/25/08. Posted by FDA: 9/26/08 Kathryn A. Roberts RE: NDA # 21-121
The Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications (DDMAC) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed professional convention panels (CON06-107 A,B,D,E,F,G) for Concerta (methylphenidate HCl) Extended-release Tablets [CII] (Concerta) submitted by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C. (Johnson & Johnson) under cover of Form FDA 2253, as well as a consumer webpage1 for Concerta. These pieces are false or misleading because they overstate the efficacy of Concerta and omit material facts regarding use of Concerta. Thus, the promotional materials misbrand the drug in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act), 21 U.S.C. 352(a), 352(n), & 321(n), and FDA’s implementing regulations. Cf. 21 CFR 202.1(e)(3)(i) & (e)(6)(i). Background According to its FDA-approved product labeling (PI)2,
Concerta is indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHD). The Indications and Usage section of the PI also
includes information regarding special diagnostic considerations, the need
for comprehensive treatment, and information about long-term use. Overstatement of Efficacy The convention panels claim, “CONCERTA® helps children improve academic performance throughout the day.” This presentation is misleading because it implies that use of Concerta will lead to an improvement in academic performance throughout the day when this has not been shown by substantial evidence or substantial clinical experience. We acknowledge that the cited reference3 does support improvement in math scores for patients treated with Concerta compared with placebo, and that improvement in math scores is commonly used to assess level of attention. However, the claim implies a much broader academic improvement; specifically, by stating that Concerta will “Improve academic performance throughout the day.” A student studies many subjects throughout the school day, including math, and your claim suggests that the student will achieve better academic performance throughout the day in all of their subjects. Improvement in attention, as evidenced by increased numbers of math problems answered correctly, has not been correlated with an improvement in academic performance throughout the day, an endpoint which has not been studied. While the available data supports the presentation in the graph regarding percentage of math problems answered correctly, they do not support the broader claim made in the convention panels about academic performance throughout the day. Similarly, the webpage, entitled “After School,” presents claims about the impact of treatment with Concerta on after school activities. Specifically, the page states:
This presentation is misleading because it asserts improvement with Concerta in a broad array of adolescent after school activities, such as athletics, clubs, and performance in part-time jobs, when this has not been demonstrated by substantial evidence. While Concerta has been shown to improve total scores on the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), which measures ADHD symptoms such as fidgeting, not listening, and talking excessively, what has not been shown is that this improvement in ADHD-RS total scores is correlated with a positive effect on adolescents’ ability to pursue interests and hobbies outside of school and to do “well in all areas of [their] daily life.” Omission of Material Fact Promotional materials are misleading if they fail to reveal material facts with respect to consequences that may result from the use of the drug as recommended or suggested by the materials. The convention panels omit material facts regarding the risk of long term growth suppression in five of the six convention panels. According to the Warnings section of the PI (in pertinent part):
The presentation of this risk information on one panel is not sufficient to ensure that the claims in each convention panel are truthful and non-misleading. Conclusion and Requested Action For the reasons discussed above, the professional convention panels and webpage misbrand Concerta in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act), 21 U.S.C. 352(a), 352(n), & 321(n), and FDA’s implementing regulations. Cf. 21 CFR 202.1(e)(3)(i) & (e)(6)(i). DDMAC requests that Johnson & Johnson immediately cease the dissemination of violative promotional materials for Concerta such as those described above. Please submit a written response to this letter on or before October 7, 2008, stating whether you intend to comply with this request, listing all violative promotional materials for Concerta the same as or similar to those described above, and explaining your plan for discontinuing use of such materials. Please direct your response to me at the Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, 5901-B Ammendale Road, Beltsville, MD 20705-1266, or facsimile at 301-847-8444. In all future correspondence regarding this matter, please refer to MACMIS # 15567 in addition to the NDA number. We remind you that only written communications are considered official. The violations discussed in this letter do not necessarily constitute an exhaustive list. It is your responsibility to ensure that your promotional materials for Concerta comply with each applicable requirement of the Act and FDA implementing regulations.
__________________________________________________________ 1. Available at http://www.concerta.net/concerta/pages/teens-after.jsp.
Last accessed September 25, 2008. 3. Pelham WE, Gangy EM, Burrows-Maclean L, et al. Once-a-day Concerta methylphenidate versus threetimes-daily methylphenidate in laboratory and natural settings. Pediatrics. 2001:107(6)
|
|||||||||
|